I am looking for information on the benefits or disadvantages of using
a turbine engine in a light armoured vehicle. I am specifically trying
to research the use of a turbine engine in a LAV III. The answer I am
looking for will evaluate the turbine in comparison to a diesel engine
with respect to power, size, fuel economy, weight and any other
distinct advantages or disadvantages. If this is done by referring to
a study already done that would be great. As a mechanical engineer I
am already well acquainted with the mechanics of both turbine and
diesel engines so do not shy away from technical answers.

---

Clarification of Question by cbone_56-ga on 23 Oct 2006 14:29 PDT

What do I need to change in my question to get it answered?

---

Clarification of Question by cbone_56-ga on 24 Oct 2006 15:04 PDT

The answer I want doesn't have to look specifically at the LAV III.
The comparison should be for a vehicle that weighs ~20 tonnes which is
about what the LAV III weighs. The points about maintenance and
environmental factors brought up by myoarin-ga would be a bonus if
they were included.

Your question is very clearly stated.  Increasing the price seems the
only choice you have, unless you can forego having the answer related
to the LAV III.
I expect the advantages of a turbine in comparison with a diesel
engine are similar for other vehicles.
There may be some specific (dis)advantages related to the military
use: maintenance, dust/sand, multi-fuel capability (?), that would be
apparent to someone familiar with with both types of engine.

Fuel efficiency is a problem for turbines.  They also have more
pronounced thermal and acoustic signatures i.e. they're not as
stealthy.

Ian G.