|
|
Subject:
Cell phone voice record remote voice alteration
Category: Computers Asked by: travel2468-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
19 Oct 2006 11:16 PDT
Expires: 18 Nov 2006 10:16 PST Question ID: 775078 |
There is a (actually several) recording (in a room) on my cell phone that was created by using the " voice record " option on the cell phone. On original review the voices were very distorted. Weeks later, some voices were very clear on original recording, and later recordings were very clear and voices were understandable. The content was preposterous to have happened. Is it possible that a cell phone memory of recording could be altered remotely, afterall they are tower activated to function. Moreover, altered with "sound-alike" voice imaging to where the replaced voices replecate people?? Could this happen??? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Cell phone voice record remote voice alteration
From: barneca-ga on 19 Oct 2006 17:52 PDT |
hi travel2468, it depends on whether or not you got this cell phone from a mysterious british gentleman known only as "Q". doesn't it seem more likely that the speaker on your phone is on the fritz, and whatever was wrong got jostled back into position and fixed itself? or you charged your battery? or something similar? even if it were possible (which i'm 99.97% sure it isn't), who exactly do you suspect of taking the time to upload your voice memo, filter it, and download it back into your phone? what would their motivation be? -cab |
Subject:
Re: Cell phone voice record remote voice alteration
From: audiothink-ga on 23 Oct 2006 16:20 PDT |
Yes, it is technically possible to manipulate the files on a cell phone from a remote location. A phone capable of internet transmissions (e.g., one that contains a 56k modem, is capable of Verizon Wireless, etc.) or bluetooth is vulnerable to file manipulation, which would include voice recordings, software, even firmware. A cell phone is, after all, a computer and should be considered prone to malicious attack. Consider the possibility that someone gained physical access to your phone, then: updated its firmware to communicate with a malicious tower; installed hidden software that surreptitiously transmits/receives data; and hijacked your firewall. Thus an intruder might have pulled your original voice recordings, distorted them with an audio editor, then pushed the new versions back onto your device in place of the original versions. All of this is technically possible, even if your phone does not have internet capability (for another explanation of why this is possible, consider the scenario in which an attacker's tower pretends to be a cell telco tower; then pushes a firmware update; then hacks your files). While technically possible, a remote compromise is statistically improbable. Few people know how to p0wn cell phones and even fewer who could p0wn a phone without physical access. Unless you are an elite individual guarding valuable secrets, the likelihood of attack is miniscule. Telco encryption algorithms and other privacy measures are truly daunting, crackable only by an elite group of clever, determined individuals. Cell phone circuitry may perform erratically for any number of reasons. An out-of-tolerance component may have escaped the manufacturer's detection, resulting in a defective unit--which may not be evident during initial use but over time can degrade in performance. Extreme temperature, physical or electrical shock, airborne particulate, and ambient moisture can all induce circuit board cracks or shorts--which may not be noticeable until the feature in question fails or performs poorly. Finally, the battery might be providing unsuitable power/current for the circuit. A faulty battery is the most probable explanation for the random degradations you have described. It would appear that the initial distortion was the result of a weak battery. The RAM in which your recordings were stored was probably never compromised. During the weeks which followed your original observation, it is likely you recharged the battery. It is therefore reasonable to attribute the performance improvement to the enhancement made to the circuit (i.e., the battery charge). To test this hypothesis, observe the record-playback feature under various power conditions: connected to charger, standalone, at battery level high, at battery level low, and (ideally) replace the battery. |
Subject:
Re: Cell phone voice record remote voice alteration
From: godie-ga on 26 Oct 2006 04:21 PDT |
If you believed in conspiracy theories then audiothink-ga'a comment is the best explation. Basically phone uses flash memory to store audio in your phone. This type of memory is made from chips that can store data even without power consistently supplied to them, technically called "static random access memory" (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory). However these types of chips consume much power compared to ordinary SDRAMs like the ones used by your PC. The more data stored to your phone, the more power it will require. You should also check the processes running on your phone, applications such as schedulers, browsers, bluetooth activity, etc can consume a lot of processing power which in turn translate into lots of memory access. Depending on the ammount of power available left the phone during playback, it may opt in to use low quality sampling rate. This doesn't just happens with audio recordings, it also applies to Video and Images. You can try a simple experiment by taking pictures (especially moving objects) at different battery levels or number of processes (see: http://handheld.softpedia.com/progDownload/Process-Viewer-Download-19404.html). You will find that your phone takes better pictures when its fully charged or the phone processor is idling. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |