![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
statute of limitations for collection
Category: Business and Money > Finance Asked by: harry22-ga List Price: $30.00 |
Posted:
31 Oct 2002 09:32 PST
Expires: 30 Nov 2002 09:32 PST Question ID: 94306 |
in 1992 i filed for bankruptcy . last month after 10 years i'm being hounded by a creditor saying i owe $3,133.oo after you include interest from the original 1200.00 i owed . i went to retreve my original bankruptcy records & low & behold that creditor is not on the list. i do not have the original hand written list i gave my lawer so it's my word against her's, from what i can find out i'v been passed onto other creditors 8 times in ten years i'v only had 2 addreses in 10 yrs. & in the same town in ohio. these creditors say the statute of limitations is 15 years i find that hard to believe, i can't find anything about the companny other than thier from newyork ny.named camco & use a postoffice box |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: statute of limitations for collection
Answered By: websearcher-ga on 31 Oct 2002 10:10 PST Rated: ![]() |
Hi harry22: Thank you for the question. I wish I had better news for you, but it looks like the statute of limitations on debt collection *is* 15 years for the state of Ohio. Unfortunately, Ohio has one of the longest statute of limitations for all the states, as can be seen from the following table: Statute Of Limitations For Debts http://www.cardreport.com/laws/statute-of-limitations.html You can see from the table on this page that if the collection agency has proof of a written contract or a promissory note from you, then the statute of limitations is 15 years. If there was only a *verbal* agreement of the debt, then the statute of limitations is only 6 years - and you would be beyond that now. (These figures were backed up by other websites that I found.) In reality, these agencies can hound you forever on this debt, but they can only take you to court over non-payment during the 15-year period. After that, you could have any court case easily dismissed. It is truly a shame that this debt was not on your bankruptcy records and that you cannot prove that your lawyers made a slip-up in processing your bankruptcy. As for the company that is hounding you, CAMCO, their full name is Capital Acquisition and Management Company and they certainly seem to have quite a reputation. If you read through some of these threads you might gain some insight into how to best "work with" this company. http://www.cardreport.com/wwwboard/wwwboard.html http://www.cardreport.com/wwwboard/messages/16232.html http://www.cardreport.com/wwwboard/messages/16138.html http://www.cardreport.com/wwwboard/messages/15672.html It appears that CAMCO is based in Illinois, not New York. Their address is: Camco Services 303 N. Main Street Rockford, Il 60611 Since you didn't really ask for anything other than the statute of limitations information, I'm not sure what else to look into for you. If you have need of clarifications, please ask and I'll do my best to help out. Please allow me to provide any requested clarifications *before* you rate this answer. Thanks. websearcher-ga Search Strategy: "Statute of limitations" "debt collection" ://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Statute+of+limitations%22+%22debt+collection%22 camco debt collection ://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=camco+debt+collection |
harry22-ga
rated this answer:![]() answered fast and to the point |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: statute of limitations for collection
From: weisstho-ga on 31 Oct 2002 11:30 PST |
Here is a letter that I sent to CAMCO on behalf of my Michigan client (note: Michigan has a six (6) year statute: Mr. X Collections Manager CAMCO Capital Acquisition & Management Company Post Office Box 158 Rockford, IL 61125 Dear X, Re. [Client Name]Troy Gaw CAMCO No. xxxxxxx Thank you for your letter of [Month] 3rd which contained an offer of settlement. Respectfully, I am reluctant to recommend this offer to my client for the following reasons: 1. The last activity on the account with [store name] was in May, 1991 and there has been no reaffirmation or validation event since that time; 2. I believe that Michigans statute of limitation on accounts such as this is six years: No person may bring or maintain any action to recover damages or sums due for breach of contract, or to enforce the specific performance of any contract unless, after the claim first accrued to himself or to someone through whom he claims, he commences the action within the periods of time prescribed by this section . . . . (8) The period of limitations is 6 years for all other actions to recover damages or sums due for breach of contract. Michigan Compiled Laws, § 600.5807. 3. Further, it is our position that the filing of a lawsuit on a debt that appears to be time-barred, without CAMCO having first determined after a reasonable inquiry that the limitations period has been or should be tolled, is an unfair an unconscionable means of collecting a debt and would be violative of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1692f; Kimber v. Federal Finl Corp., 668 F. Supp. 1480, 1487 (M.D. Ala. 1987). I believe that Michigans Regulation of Collection Practices Act, M.C.L. § 445.251 et seq. mirrors most of the federal provisions. 4. My understanding of the Fair Credit Reporting Act is that any adverse item of information (other than records of convictions of crimes) which antedates the report by more than seven years are improper under 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(a)(5). The running of the reporting period of seven years begins upon the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the commencement of the delinquency, charge to profit and loss, or similar action. 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(c)(1). Given that the alleged delinquency is reported to me as commencing May 1991, this debt would not reportable after November 1998, which is almost four years ago. Therefore, it is my opinion and advice to my client that actions to collect the alleged debt are time barred by the Michigan statute of limitations for such actions, and that derogatory reporting to the three major credit reporting agencies is not permissible under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If my understanding is incorrect or if my argument is flawed, I would appreciate your communicating that to me. Otherwise, I will assume that this matter is closed. weisstho-ga |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |