nikenn,
Trademark and domain name rights has been an on-going battle for
several years. Typically, you will see large companies going after
so-called "cybersquatters" who purchase domain names with the sole
intention of trying to get money from the respective company who's
name they have used in the domain. There have been two recent acts,
The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and the Uniform
Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy, that have been enacted to
protect companies. Even as a non-US citizen, you can be affected by
these two acts. The key to both acts, however, is if a person acted
in bad faith when they purchased the domain name.
First, I want to say that the information I am providing is exactly
that: information. It is not to be construed for legal advice. I am
not a legal professional. For legal advice, please see a lawyer or
seek other legal professional advice.
According to the PTO (patent and trademark office) the term "virtual
sex" was filed for trademark status on April 12, 2000 by Digital
Playground Corporation out of Van Nuys, California. The application
states "Services IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. G & S: Prerecorded
video and audio cassettes, CD Roms and DVDs featuring adult
entertainment; interactive audio and video cassettes, CD Roms, and
DVDs incorporating several media; namely, audio, audio visual, audio
video graphics featuring adult entertainment; and software programs
incorporating several media; namely, audio, audio visual, audio video
graphics featuring adult entertainment, recorded on cassettes, CD Roms
and DVDs featuring adult entertainment." From looking at the history
of the application, it was initially denied, then approved over the
last two years. You can see the information on this application by
going to http://tarr.uspto.gov/ and in the box on the left, choose
serial number and put the number 76023937 in the field.
The letter you received is correct in stating that it was Published in
Opposition on October 8th of this year. This means you have 30 days
to oppose the trademark using form 4-17a
(http://www.marksonline.com/tm_data/fed_forms/4-17a.pdf). Your
reasoning may be that the term is considered generic. Should the
company be granted the trademark, conceivably, they could challenge
your rights to the domain name under either The Anticybersquatting
Consumer Protection Act or the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute. You can
see the differences between the two acts at
http://www.inta.org/news/compchart.shtml.
From a review of the acts, it appears there a couple of things in your
favor. The first being that the acts appear to be directed to
trademarks that are famous at the time the domain name was registered.
The other if a trademark is distinctive at the time of registration.
Being that the trademark was not registered at the time you registered
the domain name, they may not have any options.
As some solace to you, the terms virtualsex.net and virtualsex.com are
also owned by people other than Digital Playground Corp. I would
think they would be more interested in those names prior to yours.
I wish you luck in your endeavor. If you need any further
clarification, please let me know.
Regards,
-THV
Search Terms:
trademark "domain name"
"published for opposition"
References and further information:
Croatian Trademark Regulations
http://public.srce.hr/patent/eng/nn/n1394.html
Trademark Information
http://www.ggmark.com/
International Trademark Association
http://www.inta.org/Default.htm
United States Patent and Trademark Office
http://www.uspto.gov/ |