![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Over 1,000 Comments, please!
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Movies and Film Asked by: probonopublico-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
16 Feb 2003 00:55 PST
Expires: 18 Mar 2003 00:55 PST Question ID: 161982 |
Please help to make this the most commented upon Question EVER! When Hollywood decides to film my life story, I expect that the finale will be a masked ball to which all Google Researchers, Questioners and Commentators will be invited. The masks are obviously required in the interests of confidentiality. However, my question is: Who would YOU like to represent YOU on screen? (Since it's only hypothetical, you can choose people who are alive or dead) In case you wondered, Pierce Brosnan will be playing me. | |
| |
| |
|
|
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
Answered By: omnivorous-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:35 PST Rated: ![]() |
A gross. | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
probonopublico-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
So, we've reached the end of the line and the answer's a Gross. Well done, everyone. It's been great fun. There's a lot of talent out there and it's a pleasure to enjoy your company. Kindest regards Bryan |
|
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:13 PST |
1,000 comments! I doubt it'll happen ... but okay, I'll submit comment #1. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:14 PST |
Brian, As much as I adore Pierce Brosnan, I'm a bit miffed that you won't be playing yourself. How am I supposed to get you to autograph your book for me if you're not even there?? Wah! --Missy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:16 PST |
And now for comment #2 ... a comment with content ... hmm, how about Robert De Niro ... you talkin' to me? ... you asking a question to me? ... ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:16 PST |
O.K. Mr. Bond, I'd like Halle Berry to play me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:17 PST |
Dang, missy beat me to number #2 ... but now you're up to 4 comments! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:17 PST |
Or 6! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tutuzdad-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:49 PST |
My cousin, Arthur Hunnicutt, will play me. There will also most certainly be a number of love scenes with Halle Berry. Dad |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobthedispatcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:50 PST |
I don't have any comment at all ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:52 PST |
Dead: Tallulah Bankhead/Groucho Marx Alive: Grace Zabriskie/Jack Nicholson |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobthedispatcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:52 PST |
Or I could comment that I have a comment about not having any comment. But I forgot what it was |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:53 PST |
I'd like to be played by whoever is the current Morris the Cat at the time of filming. - Hammer |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:54 PST |
Hi probonopublico, How pretentious can you get. L&K Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jbf777-ga on 16 Feb 2003 12:24 PST |
Wonder if an error message will be displayed after a certain # of comments. :) jbf777-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 16 Feb 2003 12:40 PST |
Hi Probonopublico. Having seen a picture of you, I think James Garner should play you (I think you look like him/he looks like you, whatever!) As for someone playing me....Rutger Hauer or Max von Sydow...... All the best THX1138 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: filian-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:04 PST |
Janeane Garofalo would play me. She'd have to be a more conservative Janeanne in some ways but she's the person I can most identify with on many subjects plus she's short like me. :) If it were a big classic type film, maybe Joan Fontaine. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:07 PST |
who is Pierce Brosnan? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: gan-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:07 PST |
John Prescott |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: scriptor-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
Hmmm ... if I can choose only a living person to impersonate me on the silver screen, I would like Rowan Atkinson... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: duncan2-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:34 PST |
#18 ? One should always play oneself when possible. (Stunt doubles are optional.) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
I think there is a pagelength limit which will cut us off before 1000. Since the actors representing us will be wearing masks at the ball, I'm not sure it matters, but I'll take Brad Pitt... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jeremymiles-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
I like the idea of jack nicholson, but someone said him already. Can we have him twice? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jeremymiles-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
Does the 1000th commenter get the $2? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:45 PST |
What if 1000th is not a researcher?? tisme-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:04 PST |
Definitely Steve Martin, though he'd have to do something about the white hair. We're both "wild and crazy guys!" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:05 PST |
Okay, okay, jeremymiles can be Jack. I'll be now played by Harry Dean Stanton. Cary Grant/dead will be cast as probonopublico; Dennis Hopper/alive. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ryan222-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:37 PST |
Jeremey Irons for me, please. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: guillermo-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:25 PST |
Jack Lemmon at 42 would be the perfect one for me. Now, closer to my age -though younger-, I choose John Cusack. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tehuti-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:38 PST |
Who else but Marlene Dietrich.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:38 PST |
It's ridiculous to think that people will spend their time posting comments here. ...ooops! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:42 PST |
I agree with pafalafa. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nellie_bly-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:56 PST |
Dame Judy Dench |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 16 Feb 2003 16:12 PST |
I'd like to be played by probonopublico-ga. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nelson-ga on 16 Feb 2003 17:36 PST |
Gale Harold, who plays Brian Kinney on Queer as Folk |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mathtalk-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:00 PST |
See if Raymond Burr is available... -- mt |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: acorn-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:10 PST |
Sophia Loren at any age :-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: efn-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:29 PST |
#36. I think Buster Keaton would be best qualified to capture the subtle nuances. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:42 PST |
Janeane Garofalo, with her dry, sarcastic wit and down-to-earth pragmatism, would definitely be my choice to play me. No one else even comes close. :) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: darrenw-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:15 PST |
here's another |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: darrenw-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:16 PST |
and another |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:23 PST |
Wile E. Coyote, Super Genius. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: toecutter-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:50 PST |
Humongous from "The Road Warrior" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Feb 2003 22:10 PST |
Hrm. So I've been thinking. As long as we can choose from the Dearly Departed, I'd like Rita Hayworth to play me. 'Cause, like, WOW! --Missy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:05 PST |
Peter Sellers, he could impersonate about anyone. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:05 PST |
Does anyone actually keep track of how many comments are posted? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:06 PST |
Also, does it count if the exact same thing is posted more than once? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:07 PST |
Oh, to answer my own question: the number of comments is right on top of this page! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:13 PST |
Funny. I'm not able to post the same comment twice. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 17 Feb 2003 03:15 PST |
I'd want Robin Williams to play me. He's acted as the researcher type before (e.g., Awakenings, Flubber). I just can't see some of those other actors as a studious, hunched-over-the-computer character. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 17 Feb 2003 04:11 PST |
Jessica Rabbit; She's not bad, she's just drawn that way. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 17 Feb 2003 05:22 PST |
hmmmm... I would be probably like to be there myself, so my name would be on IMDB as "as herself". I was never in the movies, except for once in high school. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 17 Feb 2003 11:13 PST |
That reminds me; why do they always change animal's names in movies? "Chip played by Champ." What's the point of that? -K~ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 17 Feb 2003 11:47 PST |
I have been told numerous times that I resemble Bernadette Peters, so she would be a good choice to play me on the silver screen. Like me, she's over 50 and still feisty. She sings better than I do, too. If Bernadette is unavailable, Bette Midler would be a most excellent replacement. If neither of these ladies can be persuaded to portray Pinkfreud-ga, I would settle for Meryl Streep in a red wig. I bet Meryl could do a fine job with the Oklahoma accent. My husband will be played by Mel Gibson. No substitutions permitted. ;-) ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 17 Feb 2003 12:19 PST |
I would like to be played by Barry Humphries |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:15 PST |
Fun question! I would like to be played by Julie Christie or Candace Bergen...but if a face like one of theirs looked back from my mirror, I would have had a different biography <sigh>. Like Pinkfreud, I'd like to cast the husband's part too! Sean Connery for me, thanks. (My husband won't mind that--as long as he can cast Darryl Hannah to play me.) Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: steph53-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:25 PST |
I'd like Goldie Hawn to represent me!!! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: robertskelton-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:26 PST |
For me: Michael Hutchence or Heath Ledger. Although this is a tittilating discussion, imagine if we had famous actors posting messages about which researcher they would like to play... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cerebro-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:31 PST |
this seems insane, but ok, let me be Jack Nicholson. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:35 PST |
all work and no play make hailstorm a...something something. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: igabe-ga on 17 Feb 2003 15:30 PST |
This is a start.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 17 Feb 2003 15:42 PST |
Will I get to meet Pierce? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: luciaphile-ga on 17 Feb 2003 17:00 PST |
Not that there's any physical resemblance, but I'd like to see myself played by a youngish Rosalind Russell . . . |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angy-ga on 17 Feb 2003 22:57 PST |
Sarah Bernhardt |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 17 Feb 2003 23:06 PST |
Okay, if we're casting spouses, then mine would have to be played by Kevin Kline, because he's got the same sly wit. If Kevin's not available, expertlaw-ga would be my next choice, because he's got it, too. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 18 Feb 2003 08:10 PST |
Spouse = Mitch Hedberg/Catherine Deneuve (alive) Montgomery Clift/Montgomery Clift (dead) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: byrd-ga on 18 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
Ok ok, this is goofy, but just to help you meet your goal, make it Anna Friel, a British actress supposedly on tap to play the lead in an upcoming movie ( http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808408065 ) about the Nachthexen, the WWII Soviet women pilots of the 588th night bomber regiment. A good friend of mine gave me the nickname of "Nightwitch" as a compliment some years ago, and I've used it as a handle ever since. Their story is a fascinating one and mostly unknown in the U.S., so if anyone's interested, have a gander here: http://students.pratt.edu/~rsilva/sovwomen.htm (watch out - music on site). Good luck gettin' your 1,000 comments ... --Byrd |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 18 Feb 2003 17:50 PST |
Things are slowing down a bit, so I'll add two. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bio-ga on 18 Feb 2003 18:50 PST |
67 and counting... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 18 Feb 2003 21:36 PST |
Anyone know if this is now the most commented question in GA history? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Feb 2003 21:55 PST |
This question had 101 comments: https://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sycophant-ga on 19 Feb 2003 00:46 PST |
I'd like Jack Black to play me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Feb 2003 01:02 PST |
C'mon Folks ... 101 to beat (Well spotted Sublime One) Keep commenting! I don't want to have do them all by myself. I shall now be bringing Daisy (my Yorkshire Terrier) to the Masked Ball. She's gonna be played by Michelle Pfeiffer (Hope you're reading this, Mitch) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: chromedome-ga on 19 Feb 2003 06:25 PST |
I dibs Patrick Stewart to play me...similarly deep-voiced and follicle-free. I don't mind that he's older...heck, I'm eighty when I roll out of bed and it takes me a good two hours and several coffees to get back down to 39. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 12:53 PST |
I am posting this anonymously. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 12:58 PST |
Well, this is certainly useful for finding out how your friends are. Where's willie and bobby??? OK, it's gloves off time. No more 5 stars and tips for any of the non-commenters. And only ONE comment each from Missy and PinkFreud? C'mon mesdames, don't you want to make history? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:00 PST |
Correction: For 'how' read 'who' ... (It's the champagne.) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobbie7-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:13 PST |
Hi Brian, I would like to played by Linda Carter. --Bobbie |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:16 PST |
Somehow I thought it would be cheating to make more than one comment. I shall take this opportunity to give some exposure to a bit of my doggerel (or is it birderel?) AIR A PARENT The Googlebird lays her eggs in the air, But the Googlebird's mate is always there To cache the eggs in a cup. The Googlebird's body is upside-downed, So she can't distinguish 'tween sky and ground, And her down is downside up. The Googlebird's egg-drops are seldom planned. She lays them free-form, you understand: Loose as a goose, and free and breezy, The Googlebird likes 'em "ova easy." ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:26 PST |
Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: pafalafa-ga on 18 Feb 2003 17:50 PST Things are slowing down a bit, so I'll add two. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:38 PST |
I |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:38 PST |
DO |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:39 PST |
THINK |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:39 PST |
ITS |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:40 PST |
CHEATING |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:40 PST |
FOR |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:41 PST |
PRPBONOPUBLICO |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:42 PST |
TO |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:42 PST |
POST |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
HIS |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
OWN |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:44 PST |
COMMENTS |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:47 PST |
Sorry probonopublico, 1341 PST was cut and pasted. I don't know how it went wrong. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 20 Feb 2003 14:05 PST |
There was a young chap called Jahnke who took up spying as a prank at the end of the war he thought 'what a bore!' and ran off with a loan from the bank ----------------------------------------- There was a young chap called Kurt who with danger was always a flirt his spying was revered until he disappeared Please continue............ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: phi-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:34 PST |
IF i ask for a buck from everyone .errrr a charity to make me a millionaire. how many would would i get !? :-| ? say which Question is the currently the most commented one anyways? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:47 PST |
There was a young chap called Kurt who with danger was always a flirt his spying was revered until he disappeared... ...and ended up under the dirt. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:57 PST |
probono said: "Well, this is certainly useful for finding out how your friends are." They're fine, thank you very much... : ) "OK, it's gloves off time. No more 5 stars and tips for any of the non-commenters." You cad! "And only ONE comment each from Missy and PinkFreud?" Well Pinky made her curtain call, and Missy is in the process of being 'missed' by all of us, for the moment... Now don't you feel bad?!? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 00:57 PST |
Hi, Sublime One Please be aware that ANYONE who calls me a cad will be automatically docked TEN STARS and any tips already given will be retracted. There are ways! However, there is still time for a grovelling apology and if you can find 20 supporters who can also enter a plea for mitigation ... (Separately on this page, please) ... Will all those in favour of the Sublime One, say so NOW! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: easterangel-ga on 21 Feb 2003 01:12 PST |
I want to be played by a cartoon character like Bart Simpson. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 21 Feb 2003 03:33 PST |
We've already passed 1,000 Base4! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cobrien-ga on 21 Feb 2003 05:45 PST |
oooh ooh !! Angelina Jolie!!!! (not that I look anything like her, but hey, I can dream, can't I???) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cobrien-ga on 21 Feb 2003 05:45 PST |
Just wanted to be no 100 ( one tenth of the way there!!) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: gitana-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:05 PST |
When my life story becomes a Lifetime t.v. movie of the week I expect to be portrayed by Maria Conchita Alonzo who has sunk so low in her career that she can't get better work. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
woah 12% of the goal is now complete... I wonder how much bandwidth this will cost Google? tisme-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
err i meant 10.2% (now 10.3%) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 10:57 PST |
Missy Which of my books would you like me to autograph for you? Kindest Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 11:01 PST |
I do hope that Kemlo (the Pessimist) will let us know when we have overtaken ID 50956 ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 21 Feb 2003 12:26 PST |
Dear probonopublico I will of course let you know the moment this happens- And not a moment sooner. Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Feb 2003 07:55 PST |
Comparisons are odious ... But 207 comments for a $2 question seem 100 times more powerful than only 206 comments for a $200 question. Right? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Feb 2003 07:57 PST |
Oops! Not 207, silly, only 107. 207 is next week's score. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:13 PST |
It's time someone posted an answer. As this is a historically important event, are there any suggestions as to who should answer? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:52 PST |
My nomination for 'question answerer' is the person who posts the 1000th comment. If it is a researcher who reaches that goal they can answer own their own. If it is a non-researcher who hits the magic number, then the non-researcher can request the researcher of his/her choice to provide an answer in the non-researcher's name. Just leave the question open and let it run its course through to the bitter end. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:53 PST |
Because if you do leave your question open till the bitter end, |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:54 PST |
it will be seen by more people, |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:55 PST |
since every time somebody adds something to it |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:56 PST |
it pops back to our attention again. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:57 PST |
And someone might come along who hadn't seen it before |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:58 PST |
and might consider |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:58 PST |
adding something of their own. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:59 PST |
Just something to think about. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 03:01 PST |
Thanks a lot, Digs. Good thinking! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 04:40 PST |
Anytime |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:15 PST |
probonopublico said: "Please be aware that ANYONE who calls me a cad will be automatically docked TEN STARS and any tips already given will be retracted." "There are ways!" "However, there is still time for a grovelling apology and if you can find 20 supporters who can also enter a plea for mitigation ... (Separately on this page, please) ..." While some might construe this as an indication that, having now set the official record for number of comments, probonopublico has a somewhat expanded hat-size, I, personally, just can't afford the loss of ten stars and related tips. I will therefore, here and now, offer a 'probono publico apologio', accompanied by sufficient grovelling to make a convincing display for the masses. *grovel* *grovel* *grovel* P.S. I offer the following alternatives to the offending 'cad' word: rascal rapscallion rogue knave rascal scalawag scallywag varlet :) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:18 PST |
rascal-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:19 PST |
rapscallion-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:20 PST |
rogue-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:20 PST |
knave-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:21 PST |
scalawag-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:22 PST |
scallywag-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:22 PST |
varlet-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 23 Feb 2003 17:35 PST |
. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:20 PST |
Well ... I am somewhat mollified, O Sublime One ... But, although there were TWO rascals on your list, only ONE has risen to your defence. Or am I seeing double? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:48 PST |
131 Am looking forward to more electrical problems from you... Shiv Reddy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:58 PST |
Are people still participating in the challenge? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:01 PST |
I would like to use the space to construct a little experiment regarding what is linked, and what is not. http://www.example.com http://example.com http://example http://www.example http://www.example.com/example.cgi?a=1+2+3 www.example.com example.com www.example.org www.example http:// http://www/ http://example. http://www.com http://www.example/.com ftp://example.com ftp://www.example.com mailto:info@example.com news:alt.example https://www.example.com https://example.com examplehttp://www.example.com/example |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:21 PST |
j_phillip... Can you give me an example of what you mean? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:22 PST |
probonopublico... You are, of course, correct - there *were* two rascals, but one of them, rapscallion that he is, abandoned me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:35 PST |
test: info@example.com |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:37 PST |
Sublime1, I would like to give you an example of what I mean, but what are you referring to? Some more testing: wwwcom www.com www..com www...com www....com www.example.com,www.example.com www.example.com,example |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:39 PST |
Testing again: mailto:example mailto:example.com mailto:example@example mailto:example@example.com (mailto:example@example.com) (mailto:example@example.com ) ( mailto:example@example.com) ( mailto:example@example.com ) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:42 PST |
j_phillip... Good job on the mailto:info@example.com ! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:43 PST |
I was just funning about giving me an example... :) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: intotravel-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:46 PST |
For da man: Nicholas Cage, and for da woman ... I don't think I could
share him with anyone! hmmm ... I like Kathleen Turner as in 'Body
Heat' (but not as in Virgin Suicides, directed by his cousin, Sofia
Coppola) and as a person; they were together in Peggy Sue Got Married.
He is the Mae West!
*
There was a young chap called Kurt
who with danger was always a flirt
his spying was revered
until he disappeared
...
into an astral adventure with Burt. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:10 PST |
Hi, Shivreddy Many thanks for EVERYTHING, including the electrical stuff. If I were to post a question on Marie Corelli's theories re electricity (as in her Heliobas trilogy: Ardath, etc.)... Would you rise to the challenge? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:17 PST |
With all the talent lined up for the Masked Ball, I fear that there's going to be many a mad rush ... Accordingly, would guests please specify NOW who they would wish their dance partners to be? First come, first served. Please note that there may only be time for 250 dances. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: serenata-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:27 PST |
I'm no Ginger Rogers (in fact, I probably dance more like Mister Rogers) ... but I'll take Fred Astaire any old day. I figure he can make even a gal with two left feet look good! They don't call me grace ... Serenata |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 24 Feb 2003 01:02 PST |
145 Sure will, even if I dont/cant, there are excellent researchers aboard this vessel who would love to pin down fantasy logic... lets see what you got! Will you be sending out Gold bordered invites? I like this one >> www.com Shiv Reddy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:27 PST |
Three questions: |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
1. Who would be playing Jahnke? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
2. Do we need body doubles at the nude scenes? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
3. Do we need stunts? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:29 PST |
OK, four questions: |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:29 PST |
4. What would be on the soundtrack? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 24 Feb 2003 07:13 PST |
I would like my dance partner to be Pierce Brosnan of course! He did quite well in the Thomas Crown Affair. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 24 Feb 2003 07:51 PST |
Is anyone being played by Meg Ryan? I could look at her sweet mug up close in a slow dance all night long. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 08:05 PST |
Regarding dance partners... Since I don't dance, I'd like to see the fabulous Gregory Hines dancing with my stunt double. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 09:46 PST |
This is getting to be too much for one man to handle ... First, Byrd: Yes Anna Friel is OK because she's a Lancashire lass, born in Rochdale ... which (as every Google Researcher knows) is right next door to Oldham - my home town. Sorry, Googlenut but if Halle Berry (who's mother comes from Liverpool, another Lancashire lass) is there then to Hell with Pierce Brosnan, I shall play the part myself. (Google Researchers will be aware that Jolson himself played the part of Jolson singing Swanee in The Jolson Story.) Sorry, Sublime One but if Meg Ryan is there (and why not?) then, again, I shall have to twirl her round the dance floor. Sorry, Political Guru, YOU have landed the job of Musical Director. (Fully dressed please!) Regarding Kurt Jahnke, if Scriptor can manage more than a few words of German, French, English and Spanish ... then he can audition for the part. Dankeschoen. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobbie7-ga on 24 Feb 2003 09:59 PST |
I would like a slow dance with Antonio Banderas, Val Kilmer and Al Pacino. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 24 Feb 2003 10:40 PST |
As i've said before I will be played by Barry Humphries His dancing partner will be Dame Edna Everidge. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 24 Feb 2003 10:45 PST |
Hi probonopublico, How much more pretentious can you get. There is no chance of exceeding 200 comments. H&K Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 11:25 PST |
Oh dear, Kemlo Ever the pessimist! When you (or the actor who is playing you) are on the dance floor, then please don't leave your handbag where it might get stolen ... Or it will ... And that's a promise! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 11:44 PST |
Bryan, Perhaps Kemlo/Dame Edna would sashay away and stop needling you with his/her hatpin if you would answer his/her question regarding how much more pretentious you can get. I know that I, for one, could get a whole heck of a lot more pretentious than this. Trusting you are the same. ;-) (Many thanx for the fun thread!) ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: robertskelton-ga on 24 Feb 2003 14:58 PST |
I have feeling that, seeing as 1,000 comments is totally unachievable, the question title contains a typo, and Mr pbp-ga really was only after 100 comments. Therefore I see no need for me to add anything, as we are already up to 160. Doh! 161. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ericynot-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:41 PST |
Sam Elliott por favor. Lean, laconic, and with the proper dose of bemused humor. He always seems to be riding a horse or a Harley. And, he's married to Katherine Ross. Works for me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: seizer-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:46 PST |
I'd hate to be played onscreen by anyone other than myself - after all, a spot of high school acting should be experience enough for any rôle, right? Right? ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:46 PST |
This is a lot of filler. And I don't think the same person commenting several times should count. For the true winner for most comments go to the original: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: serenata-ga on 24 Feb 2003 17:23 PST |
Does it count of Probonopublico comments himself??? Sort of pads those numbers, doesn't it? Still don't call me grace ... Serenata |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 18:14 PST |
Kemlo, A fellow Researcher has taken me to task for having been rude to you. I spoke in jest, and certainly meant no offense. I apologize if any offense was taken. ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 21:28 PST |
Dear RobertSkelton Another pessimist! My only regret is that I was not MORE ambitious. I should have gone for a million. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 24 Feb 2003 22:28 PST |
pbp.. I shall dance with Meg Ryan while your twirling with Halle Berry. I also want a shot at cutting the rug with Katharine Ross while ericynot is dancing with her hubby. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 23:18 PST |
Dear Pink On behalf of Kemlo (who is somewhat shy) I have to say that no one could possibly take offence at any comment made by you. Keep a-commenting! B |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: filian-ga on 25 Feb 2003 10:59 PST |
In my movie there'd be lots of gratuitous male nudity -- the full monty up the wazoo. I of course, er the person playing me, would be the only female so she'd get all the male attention. The men starring in my film would range from Rupert Graves, Kevin Spacey, Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, Guy Pearce, Luke and Owen Wilson to Jude Law, Orlando Bloom, Colin Firth and even Harvey Keitel (because he is The Man). My boyfriend/husband/lover would be played by the one and only Jake Gyllenhaal. Yes indeedy. The soundtrack would be a mix of opera and classical music to new wave romantic and goth punk with these bands taking part: Flesh for Lulu, The Cure, The Smiths, The Housemartins, Thrashing Doves, Depeche Mode and of course, Voice of the Beehive. Toodle pipski! Filian |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 25 Feb 2003 11:19 PST |
Gee, I sure do like Filian's list of male co-stars. Actually, I would settle for a ménage à quatre involving Kevin Spacey, Jude Law, and Orlando Bloom. Or any of 'em solo. I'm easy. Filian, I have quite a bit of amateur theatrical background. May I play you in your movie? If so, you might want to play me in my movie. If you like Mel Gibson, that is. ;-) ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 25 Feb 2003 11:50 PST |
Yawn, 172! Shiv Reddy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 25 Feb 2003 12:17 PST |
comment |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:08 PST |
No comment. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:43 PST |
I'm gonna play myself of course. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:43 PST |
They're gonna put me in the movies. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:44 PST |
They're gonna make a big star outta me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:45 PST |
They tell me I'm gonna make the big time. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:46 PST |
And all I gotta do is act natchurlly. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:46 PST |
I think that was a song. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
If not |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
It should be. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
Big Star: http://directory.google.com/Top/Arts/Music/Bands_and_Artists/B/Big_Star/ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:48 PST |
Act Naturally: http://www.stevesbeatles.com/songs/act_naturally.asp |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:51 PST |
Big Time: http://www.rollingstone.com/videos/playvideo.asp?sid=4385&cf=59 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:51 PST |
Just trying to illustrate what Digsalot is saying. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 25 Feb 2003 22:08 PST |
Just to bring this question back to the front page... Shiv Reddy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:55 PST |
With all due respect to Scriptor, if he plays two parts (one as Scriptor and another as Jahnke), it would make it look like a cheap soap opera or B-Movie. I suggest John Thaw or Michael Caine (especially the young ones). If you're looking for a German actor, I recommend Armin Mueller-Stahl. However, after seeing the brilliant "Painist" (if you haven't seen it yet - go!), I must say that Adrian Brody demonstrated quiet good acting and ability to speak different languages (German, Polish and of course English, I saw it in the original version!). |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:58 PST |
Regarding the gals' discussion on the famous male nude scene, I feel a little bad that the young Sean Connery is not in. He is, after all, the first, one and only Bond. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:59 PST |
I'll dance with David Bowie (who is also an actor): http://www.absolutelyric.com/a/view/David%20Bowie/Lets%20Dance/ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 05:01 PST |
Must agree with Filian's fine choice of music. However, I also thought the Boo Radleys "Wake Up" is a great opening song for a beginning of a film. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: websearcher-ga on 26 Feb 2003 05:51 PST |
Definitely Tom Cruise for me. I was once told I look like him (but I don't think I do). websearcher-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:06 PST |
a fifth |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
of the goal |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
is almost |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
here |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
that is |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
20% |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:08 PST |
of the required |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:08 PST |
comments (200) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:48 PST |
I don't know why anybody would respond to this question! I know that I certainly would not add to the cause! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:27 PST |
I agree with liner-ga. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:31 PST |
Yea!!!!!! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:32 PST |
We're back. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:34 PST |
I almost did the same thing politicalguru did and post a comment as an answer. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:35 PST |
So I can understand how PG must have felt when the answer popped up. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:03 PST |
Add a bonus prize to politicalguru, Five comments in the same minute, how do you do it? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:08 PST |
to Pink All comments made and taken in Jest. But if I see a sombulant tiger I poke it with a sharp stick LL Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:22 PST |
Let's see ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:22 PST |
... how can you post five comments in the same minute ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... I think it can be done ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... by opening "Add a Comment" in five windows ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... and submitting comments in each of them ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... wait, this is six! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:25 PST |
Dang, I split the comments over the course of 2 minutes. At least I tried. :-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:21 PST |
Several hours since the last comment ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
Ok. Testing. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
I really have nothing more to say. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
Except |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
For |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
A |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Comments |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
In |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
This |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Question |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Anyhow, |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Rock |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:54 PST |
On! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:10 PST |
There once was a fellow named Bryan Who started a thread that's undyin'. A kilo of answers? A masked ball with dancers? Pinkfreud will applaud him for tryin'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:28 PST |
There is a Researcher named 'freud Who temperment'ly is never annoyed Her first name is pink A woman, I think, Whose comments are always enjoyed. Gee, that's the first limerick I've tried in years. Could be better, could be worse. Anyone else want to have a go? It's a long way to a thousand .... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:56 PST |
It's also a long way to Tipperary... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
Of |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
course |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
paying |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
a |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
'rary' |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
penny |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
at |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
time |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
is |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
*also* |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
long |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:11 PST |
Wow! You people have been busy. I think we may get to 1000 if we sustain this rate. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:48 PST |
Well maybe I just hit the wrong button . . . now it's appearing as an answer. We can always withdraw my "gross" non-comment. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 27 Feb 2003 04:06 PST |
I'm the last one! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Feb 2003 08:13 PST |
Now ... Who said 244 was the max? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:38 PST |
So what was the question that launched........... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:40 PST |
Finger trouble, its still accepting comments |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:45 PST |
two hundred and fortynine and you will be pleased to read i am running out of steam. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 27 Feb 2003 19:48 PST |
probonopublico, Why exactly did you rate this question's answer five stars with a tip? The answer had absolutely no relation to the original question asked, and the Researcher displayed poor math skills on top of that! I would have asked for a refund... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Feb 2003 21:02 PST |
Hi, Hailstorm I'm a simple soul who believes EVERYTHING uttered by every Google researcher (especially Missy, Pinky, Bobbie and Ace). It's the doctrine of infallibily that they share with governments and politicians. I also believe in Father Christmas. Please don't disabuse me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:13 PST |
I think someone else might have a bit of math problems as well. 200 is exactly 20% of 1000 - or did we recede to 500? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:15 PST |
Regarding Bryan's trust and faith in other human beings (especially if they are GARs), I suggest a quote from Neil Young: "Take my advice, don't listen to me...". |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:21 PST |
Hi, Political Guru You have obviously overlooked the crossing of the International Date & Data Lines which have multiplier effects on all Internet-based calculations. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:29 PST |
It |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:29 PST |
is |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
not |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
the |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
end |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:31 PST |
of |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:32 PST |
line |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
yet |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
even |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
omniverous |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
did |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
inadvertantly |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 28 Feb 2003 17:13 PST |
Hey, I just noticed that Bryan's actual question was "Who would YOU like to represent YOU on screen?" The answer given by Omnivorous was "A gross." Gee, Omnivorous, that could be any one of a number of actors. Tom Green springs to mind... :-D |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 28 Feb 2003 20:12 PST |
268 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: easterangel-ga on 28 Feb 2003 20:23 PST |
Well. I'm not giving up yet! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 28 Feb 2003 21:01 PST |
I dont understand why this cannot reach 1000 Shiv Reddy |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Mar 2003 01:52 PST |
I wonder what all those other Google researchers who have not yet commented are doing? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 01 Mar 2003 02:07 PST |
They don't want to play with the little children |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tan-ga on 07 Mar 2003 13:25 PST |
This is 273. I would be played by Liza Minelli and it would be a musical. A musical comedy. Co-staring Clint Eastwood. Can it get any funnier? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Mar 2003 13:33 PST |
Hey ... We're on the move again! Many thanks, Tan, we'll reach 1,000 yet. C'mon folks, more comments please ... Will EVERYBODY who has previously commented please reappear? And tell your friends, too. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cmaury-ga on 07 Mar 2003 14:08 PST |
just helping this thing on it's way. Any actor foolish enough to take the role of me would have their work cut out for them. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 07 Mar 2003 14:49 PST |
Hey...I thought this thing had reach some sort of unbreachable cosmic limit. Goes to show what I know... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Mar 2003 22:05 PST |
I am having difficulty finalising my list of dance partners. Would anyone who is prepared to forego the honour and pleasure, please let me know immediately. Thanks! The Masked One |
| Subject:
My sister says I look like Joe Cocker
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 08 Mar 2003 23:45 PST |
With a little help from my friends... The song sounds appropriate for this bonafide occasion. http://admin.pressplay.com/duet/sampler/sampler.html?opcode=search&type=artist&id=10000302&class=artist&artist_id=10000302&LID=3487313 I would try to do what you just might construe with a bit of luck you wont give a chuck So we bid SWEET ADIEU If any one starts with the 999 beers on the wall I personally am going to fart in their presence, no it wont be pretty! |
| Subject:
Sergeant Schultz is a Genius
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Mar 2003 00:18 PST |
I had never thought of changing the Subject Line. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 10 Mar 2003 14:12 PST |
What colour (color for some of our colonies) masks do attendees intend to wear? (This information is required for security reasons) Please note that your comments may be recorded for training purposes. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Mar 2003 13:34 PST |
Where's Websearcher? What a geek! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 11 Mar 2003 14:37 PST |
I said it earlier and I am saying it again: I will never deign to play around with such a silly game of simply adding comments for the sake of comments. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jumpingjoe-ga on 13 Mar 2003 09:34 PST |
Finally adding a comment... under duress! Good work with all this Bryan, you're following up the sentiment behind your handle. er... Jack Nicholson can play me in the movie of my life:- we can save money by just redubbing the occasional line of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 13 Mar 2003 09:45 PST |
[quote="probonobublico"]I'm a simple soul who believes EVERYTHING uttered by every Google researcher (especially Missy, Pinky, Bobbie and Ace).[/quote] Good. It's nice to know I'm fooling SOMEBODY. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:16 PST |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #285... and now it has happened. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:26 PST |
piffle |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: andywall-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:28 PST |
What a blast! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 14 Mar 2003 22:53 PST |
[Space left intentionally blank] |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 14 Mar 2003 23:37 PST |
this document contains no data |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:27 PST |
Eenie, meanie, chili beanie... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:32 PST |
Now that my crystal ball has unfogged....Lily Tomlin. (I also believe she'd make a fine President because she would certainly add corners to the Oval Office.) |
| Subject:
Comments
From: omnivorous-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:50 PST |
TGI Saturday. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 15 Mar 2003 09:00 PST |
>> What colour (color for some of our colonies) masks >> do attendees intend to wear? As might be expected, I shall be "in the pink." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 15 Mar 2003 16:35 PST |
An asynchronous request is pending. |
| Subject:
Probonopublico? Me a Genius? <'(((><
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 15 Mar 2003 17:18 PST |
Do any of you have a great website that you would love to share with your friends? Like http://hardtofindseminars.com or http://www.sowpub.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl or ? |
| Subject:
Me a genius? Wow, that explains the mood swings! ~~~~~~^~~~^~^~^~><)))'>~~~~~^~^
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 15 Mar 2003 17:28 PST |
Where oh where are you tonight? I searched the world over, thought I'd found true love... You (rippppp) another and _____ I was gone. Living or dead? Any actor or non-actor, hopefully someone you recognize, eh? Did everyone see Google's cute Albert Einstein making up the first o in the main google page? It was his birthday yesterday (3-14). I guess me being called a genius has me considering new characters to play me. Einstein has too much hair though, I guess he could get buzzed. Later |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 15 Mar 2003 21:50 PST |
Coming up for 300 ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:43 PST |
But who wants to be the three-hundreths |
| Subject:
Re: Over 10,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:45 PST |
When if I wait a little while it will be me |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:48 PST |
See Bryan I told you so, you won't make it past 100 comments never mind 300, Not a chance in the world. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Mar 2003 02:08 PST |
Hi, Kemlo Good to hear from you again. We haven't yet fixed a venue for the Masked Ball. Any suggestions? Regards PSAW |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 16 Mar 2003 04:00 PST |
Let me start a little free-style everyone-can-participate mystery story. What you do is write some sentences every time, cut them off before the end, then wait for another *-ga to take over the sentence. --------------------- It was a stormy winter night when private Researcher Samspade locked a question that would change his life forever. The question title was ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tehuti-ga on 16 Mar 2003 04:36 PST |
Come now, let us not be too hasty in giving away the secret. After all, we don't want a horde of researchers breathing down sam's neck, ready to snatch the lock away from him as he fails to renew it for the fourth time, due to his alarm clock failing to ring at 3.22 am. Suffice it to say, that it offered the astounding price of $2 for a 10,000 word thesis that required extensive experience in... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 16 Mar 2003 07:28 PST |
...onomatopoeia. Sam shook his head as he clicked the Answer button. It would be a lot of work, but he had the necessary expertise from his younger days, when he was as a... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Mar 2003 07:32 PST |
...quantum physics. Though he had studied physics briefly in college, he had forgotten most of what he had learned. Still, it wasn't like his answer was actually going to be ready - this was another case where he was certain that it would be copied and pasted into Word, auto-spellchecked and called a term paper. Even so, he was enjoying the physics brush-up, and had 15 Mozilla tabs open when... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:08 PST |
from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredigle sight he... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:08 PST |
from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredible sight he... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:39 PST |
Hi, Digsalot Was that TWO different black horses? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 16 Mar 2003 10:53 PST |
For comments to total one K We need more to enter the fray So whomever you are Whether near or afar Please send in more nonsense today For the lead in my movie biography? The obvious choice is that stalwart, handsome and agile action hero.(Hint: His first name is Sylvester.) No, no, no! Not Stallone! The other one! Sufferin' succotash! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 10:56 PST |
No probo - just a problem with posting. LOL, I didn't think the first one had gone through before I corrected the spelling typo in "incredible." There is only one horse and only one purple haired Valkerie. She will acknowledge no rival. - - - Now back to the story. |
| Subject:
!!!___,,,^.".^,,,___!!!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Mar 2003 12:06 PST |
Biplex port is initializing. Wait a few seconds and redial. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: steph53-ga on 16 Mar 2003 15:09 PST |
"from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredible sight he..." ...knocked his chair over and fell. Just before he hit the floor, the purple haired Valkerie reached down and effortlessly lifted him up onto the horse... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tlspiegel-ga on 16 Mar 2003 16:45 PST |
off course... uh... I mean of course. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:37 PST |
... when his alarm bell rang and awoke him from this chaotic nightmare. That's when Samspade realized he had the question locked for 1 hour and 55 minutes already. Panicking, drooling, he jumped up from the carpet where he had landed and into the chair, reaching for ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:38 PST |
Below comment is wrong. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:39 PST |
Above comment is right. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:17 PST |
Oh |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:17 PST |
my |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:18 PST |
word |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:18 PST |
today |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:20 PST |
deadline |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
and |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
so |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
many |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:22 PST |
to |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
do |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
327 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
328 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:52 PST |
A syntax error was encountered while processing a script. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:53 PST |
Loopback detected.. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:54 PST |
Cannot access TCPCFG.DLL. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:54 PST |
The phone number, including prefix and suffix, is too long. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:55 PST |
The PPP packet is invalid. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:55 PST |
PPP terminated by remote machine. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:56 PST |
PPP timeout. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:56 PST |
The Remote Access IP configuration is unusable. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:57 PST |
No active ISDN lines are available. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
RasMan initialization failure. Check the event log. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
Error changing password on domain. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:59 PST |
X.25 diagnostic indication. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 20:01 PST |
Cannot detect carrier. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 20:02 PST |
A person answered instead of a modem. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:31 PST |
(Comment 343 is reserved for future use.) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:36 PST |
Out of cheese error. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:36 PST |
Please reinstall universe and hit restart. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:37 PST |
We're sorry, but the page you are looking for does not yet exist. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:38 PST |
Redo From Start. Reality Domain Error. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:38 PST |
Unexpected Error: Object 'Comment 347' does not exist. Please consult help. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:39 PST |
Oh Missy you stole my comment! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:40 PST |
Missy, behind you -- a $200 dollar question! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:42 PST |
150.00 USD United States Dollars = 570.000 MYR Malaysia Ringgits xe.com - The Universal Currency Converter http://www.xe.com/ucc/ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:44 PST |
[Comment has been cancelled.] |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 22:31 PST |
From my Unnecessary Links Collection: The Poorly-Drawn Lamp Page http://www.flamingmayo.com/poorlydrawnlamps/ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: seizer-ga on 19 Mar 2003 04:49 PST |
Error: printer on fire (no, really: http://www.eeggs.com/items/1037.html ) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 19 Mar 2003 08:33 PST |
dsfsadfasd |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 19 Mar 2003 08:34 PST |
ummm thats funny |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 19 Mar 2003 09:38 PST |
Comment # 357 My choice is Heather Graham....the flamboyant version of myself;) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 358 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Mar 2003 16:30 PST |
We have the venue, we have the costumes. what we need next is the menu. how many courses and their contents. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Mar 2003 05:27 PST |
Just stopped for a few minutes ... Now, are we already for the next big surge forward? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 22 Mar 2003 07:20 PST |
There's nothing much happening with the *real* questions (i.e., the one's I can earn some money on) so I just thought I'd drop in another comment here. Keep on keeping on... paf |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Mar 2003 07:55 PST |
On behalf of my producers, I am pleased to report that Heather Graham will be made VERY welcome. Hope you're following this, Heath. Thanks, Carpediem (Now that's a funny alias!). |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 23 Mar 2003 08:47 PST |
Hi Probonopublico Just wondered what young master feral has to say about this question LoL Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Mar 2003 10:15 PST |
A flea and a fly in a flue were imprisoned so what could they do? Said the flea "let us fly" said the fly" let us flee" so they flew through a flaw in the flue. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Mar 2003 11:48 PST |
Hi, Simon (Kemlo) & The Sublime One No news from Feral on this. as yet. But, Sublime One, You just get better and better. Are you perfect? (Or should I post a supplementary?) LOL Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:31 PST |
"Success is sweet and sweeter if long delayed and gotten through many struggles and defeats." -- Amos Bronson Alcott |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"We fall forward to succeed." -- Mary Kay Ash |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"Success is a journey not a destination. The doing is usually more important than the outcome." -- Arthur Ashe |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"The most successful men in the end are those whose success is the result of steady accretion." -- Alexander Graham Bell |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"It is the man who carefully advances step by step, with his mind becoming wider and wider ... who is bound to succeed ..." -- Alexander Graham Bell |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"Success is often the result of taking a misstep in the right direction." -- Al Bernstein |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"When all is said and done, success without happiness is the worst kind of failure." -- Louis Binstock |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"Success means winning the war, not every battle." -- Edwin C. Bliss |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"The first and most important step toward success is the feeling that we can succeed." -- Nelson Boswell |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"To guarantee success, act as if it were impossible to fail." -- Dorothea Brande |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:35 PST |
"The only thing that separates successful people from the ones who aren't is the willingness to work very, very hard." -- Helen Gurley Brown |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:35 PST |
"A minute's success pays the failure of years." -- Robert Browning |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 25 Mar 2003 01:28 PST |
So much for pep talk. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 10:37 PST |
j_philipp How much is a pep torque ? Priced at sence per pound. Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:21 PST |
Hi Bryan Just a thought, perhaps it is a good thing feral did not post on this question, considering what Google did to the site he did post at. It would be a great pity to have it erased before you reach your goal. Regards Simon (I see some E-mailers end with the words "Hugs and Kisses" :-))) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:23 PST |
I recall that Alexander Graham Bell's telephone didn't work ... Until his pal at the Patent Office tipped him off about Elisha Gray's patent that did work ... thus giving Bell the chance to modify his own patent application which had an earlier priority. So, Bell's success was based on fraud! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:40 PST |
Hi Bryan Nice to hear about your grandmother. In the nineteen fifties I used to live near there at a place called Hatfield Borstal. But I was only there two and a half years. Was that the one where both patents were filed on the same day within hours of each other. Regards Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:48 PST |
Hi, Simon (Please note that I am the supreme authority on etiqette.) You're right about the patents being filed the same day. But Bell was the only one with the patent agent in his pocket. KR B |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:54 PST |
Kindly note that, on this day, I have decided and I therefore decree that the letter 'U' is no longer necessary after 'Q' in the English language. Please pass this important decision on to all your contacts. Many thanks. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 25 Mar 2003 20:42 PST |
This qite radically changes the nature of the qestion, but it would be silly to qit now. We must qench our thirst for the answer to this qery as qickly as we can. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 25 Mar 2003 22:05 PST |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #385... and now it has happened. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:42 PST |
SnapAnswer? Waiting for #385 does not impress me as being very snappy. Will you be changing your nom de guerre when (if ever) this is permitted? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:46 PST |
1. Two vultures board an airplane, each carrying two dead raccoons. The stewardess looks at them and says, "I'm sorry, gentlemen, only one carrion allowed per passenger." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:48 PST |
. Two boll weevils grew up in South Carolina. One went to Hollywood and became a famous actor. The other stayed behind in the cotton fields and never amounted to much - he became known as the lesser of two weevils. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:57 PST |
A group of chess enthusiasts checked into a hotel and were standing in the lobby discussing their recent tournament victories. After about an hour, the manager came out of theoffice and asked them to disperse. "But why?" they asked, as they moved off. "Because," he said,"I can't stand chess-nuts boasting in an open foyer." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Mar 2003 04:22 PST |
Hi, Simon, aka Kemlo the Magnificent Those are actually rather good ... I don't suppose that you have 600 more? KR B |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:02 PST |
OK |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:04 PST |
Here is 1 - - - - If the count stops before 10, it means I'm getting "document contains no data" messages again. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:04 PST |
Anda 2 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:05 PST |
Anda 3 - - - Have you ever heard of Lawrence Welk? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:06 PST |
Try for 4 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:06 PST |
5 - - up to a quarter of a score. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:08 PST |
6 - - Pick up Stix - - but that's another story. Stix hasn't been working her corner lately. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:09 PST |
7 - A very unlucky number if you happen to be playing the Big 6 or Big 8 at the dice table. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:10 PST |
8 - My birth weight |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:11 PST |
9 - - Toe the line. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:12 PST |
10 - - Now back to my pen. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:14 PST |
Personally, I vote for "Lorainne's Barefoot Grass" - - I need the $15. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:23 PST |
Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly, so hey lit a fire in the craft. Unsurprisingly it sank, proving once again that you can't have your kayak and heat it too. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:27 PST |
A woman has twins and gives them up for adoption. One of them goes to family in Egypt and is named "Ahmal." The other goes to a family in Spain; they name him "Juan." Years later, Juan sends a picture of himself to his birth mother. Upon receiving the picture, she tells her husband that she wishes she also had a picture of Ahmal. Her husband responds, "They're twins! If you've seen Juan, you've seen Ahmal." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:33 PST |
These friars were behind on their belfry payments, so they opened up a small florist shop to raise funds. Since everyone liked to buy flowers from the men of God, a rival florist across town thought the competition was unfair. He asked the good fathers to close down, but they would not. He went back and begged the friars to close. They ignored him. So, the rival florist hired Hugh MacTaggart, the roughest and most vicious thug in town to "persuade" them to close. Hugh beat up the friars and trashed their store, saying he'd be back if they didn't close up shop. Terrified, they did so, thereby proving that...(are you ready) . Hugh, and only Hugh, can prevent florist friars. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:36 PST |
Mahatma Gandhi, as you know, walked barefoot most of the time, which produced an impressive set of calluses on his feet. He also ate very little, which made him rather frail and with his odd diet, he suffered from bad breath. This made him ....(Oh, man, this is so bad, it's good) ......A super calloused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 23:26 PST |
Hi Bryan I've just read my comment "381" and have come to a thought you mite think I was an inmate in the Borstal. Far from that, my father was a deputy governor there. As to Lincolnshire, I'm not a "Yellow Belly" as I've only lived heir for twenty six years since my retirement. Rgd. Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 23:32 PST |
Hi Bryan It is now taking thirty four seconds to display this page and we are only at four hundred and eight. Extrapolate this to one thousand comments Rgd. Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: johnfrommelbourne-ga on 27 Mar 2003 07:10 PST |
Does the fact that I have no comment to make on the subject matter at hand constitute as a true comment as per the 1000 you are seeking or is this comment therefore not considered a comment at all. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Mar 2003 07:30 PST |
Hi, Simon (aka Kemlo the Magnificent Thanks for the further jokes. 'Since your retirement'? ... And I thought you were only a youngster! Hi, Johnfrommelbourne Any comment is welcome - especially from you ... (Creep, creep) Rgds Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Mar 2003 12:21 PST |
I spillced coffcee cincto my kcey boardc.c As a rcesulct, c's gcet inctermixcced with cwactever I ctypce. Plcease replace mcy kceyboard. ccthanks. |
| Subject:
Engineers are so smart...
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:24 PST |
A Lawyer, A Doctor and an Engineer were posed with that question, "Is the glass half full or half empty?" Well the Lawyer says, "It's obviously half empty... We're you hurt? Did someone steal it? Let's sue!" The Doctor says, "It appears to be half full but we can make it complete... Do you have insurance?" The Engineer says, "It's obvious that job is using twice as much glass as is needed." As usual... Sgt. Shultz knows.... Nuthing! |
| Subject:
Will the real probonopublico stand up?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:57 PST |
Okay now go check the lock at your front door. Then go to the bathroom and pull out the little box from the upper left corner of your medicine chest, bring it back to your pc. On the back of the box, locate the third line down. Place that third line into your google search field and post the top result here as soon as possible. Remember this is a vitally important mission, we will release more information to you ater your post. Hurry! . . ? ? ! What are you waiting for? |
| Subject:
ater could be after
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:59 PST |
Now get going! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 27 Mar 2003 20:26 PST |
Two Kiwis (New Zealanders) are walking toward each other, and one is carrying a sack. When they meet, one says, "Hey Marvin, watcha got in th' bag?" "Jis' some lambs." "If I guesses how many they is, kin I have one?" "Hey, if ya guesses right, I'll give you both of 'em." "OK. Ummmmmmmm .... five?" Had to be a part of the 'K' quest, please forgive this Aussie sharing some Kiwi ribbing as part of the process but individual motivation is a personal matter and the joke does contain semi-relevant numerical matter. Good luck . |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Mar 2003 22:38 PST |
WOW ....... Will this never end? Is this perpetual motion? |
| Subject:
"The Comment of Dreams"
From: flashv-ga on 28 Mar 2003 00:12 PST |
probonopublico-ga, Just write it. They will come. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 28 Mar 2003 00:14 PST |
Occurs to me too probonopublico-ga that in the pursuit of this lofty goal, your email must be getting a pounding, with all of these comment notifications. Indeed this must be considered a labour of love for you. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cmaury-ga on 28 Mar 2003 07:44 PST |
Here's my comment: I like cheese |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flajason-ga on 28 Mar 2003 10:09 PST |
"Aw, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14 percent of all people know that. " - Homer Simpson |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: turkeyvanfan-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:20 PST |
Some day everyone will visit turkeyvan dot com. But don't go there yet, its not ready. EAT TUUUUUUUUUUUURRRKKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYY! |
| Subject:
Re: Mis-spelling of our English
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:30 PST |
Hi Bryan Just wanted to use this page to point out that to make you feel more at home I am delibretley mis-spelling the occasional word. So please do not feel embarraced in pointing out these as examples to others less litterate than ourselves. Regards Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:34 PST |
Ohhecknowmyspacebarhasgonetosleepithinkitwaswhenipushedthekeyboardlockbymistakenowiwillhavetorestartseeyousoonregardskemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: intotravel-ga on 28 Mar 2003 16:38 PST |
As Nasruddin emerged form the mosque after prayers, a beggar sitting on the street solicited alms. The following conversation followed: - Are you extravagant? asked Nasruddin. - Yes Nasruddin, replied the beggar. - Do you like sitting around drinking coffee and smoking? asked Nasruddin. - Yes, replied the beggar. - I suppose you like to go to the baths everyday? asked Nasruddin. - Yes, replied the beggar. - ...And maybe amuse yourself, even, by drinking with friends? asked Nasruddin. - Yes I like all those things. replied the beggar. - Tut, Tut, said Nasruddin, and gave him a gold piece. A few yards farther on, another beggar who had overheard the conversation begged for alms also. - Are you extravagant? asked Nasruddin. - No, Nasruddin replied second beggar. - Do you like sitting around drinking coffee and smoking? asked Nasruddin. - No, replied second beggar. - I suppose you like to go to the baths everyday? asked Nasruddin. - No, replied second beggar. - ...And maybe amuse yourself, even, by drinking with friends? asked Nasruddin. - No, I want to only live meagerly and to pray, replied second beggar. Whereupon the Nasruddin gave him a small copper coin. - But why, wailed second beggar, do you give me, an economical and pious man, a penny, when you give that extravagant fellow a sovereign? Ah my friend, replied Nasruddin, his needs are greater than yours. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 17:46 PST |
Has anyone noticed the bad design of computer keyboards today. Whenever I place my mug of coffee on the keyboard to stir in the sugar it will invariably topple over and slop. My previous computer had a cup holder that slid out from the front, a well thought out design. My current one (an iMac) does not. Any one any suggestions on the problem? Is it worth posting this as a qestion? |
| Subject:
Where's the Ketchup?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:48 PST |
(') (')
o^o
<~~~>
W |
| Subject:
ocilbuponoborp
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:52 PST |
We can all hope... and pray that probonopublico has bigger fish to fry than this lil' thing. Same thing goes for us... Pierce Brosnan eh? |
| Subject:
Comments: 2 for a dollar
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
THE time draws near... The artists' create pictures of the images in their minds. The writers' create pictures of the images they want in our minds. We voyeurs of these slide shows wait for more. What are you waiting for? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 28 Mar 2003 21:58 PST |
Quote: chris.com - ASCII Art Collection - Betty Boop http://www.chris.com/ascii/ .$$$b ... 4$$$$be... 9$b zd$$$$$$$$$$$$$e .z$$$$$$$$$$$ J$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c d$- z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$L $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b 4$$$$$$$$$$P"" '$$F$**$$$$$$$$$$$$$$**$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$F . ^"" ^*$$$$$* %e$$P*$$$$$ 4$$$$$$$$$$$$ *%" $$$$$ $$$$$$$P d$$b d$$c $$$$ $$$$$$$ .$" ^ "L $$$$$F $.d$$$$$$F . P ^F "*$$% *$$$$$$$$$e$ $ ^c $$. "$$$$$$$$$$" ." 4 . z 4$$$ ^$$$$$$" ^r J $ z .f '$$P *$$$$$ 3.z$$$*$L.F 4$$$$$ z '$" $$$$$$. 3$. 3$$$$ 'P $$$$F 3$" $%. *$$$$$$$$b $$$ 4 .$$$F 'F4$$$e$ .. 4$$$$$$$$P $"" 4 d$$P F^$$$$F $$$$$$$$$$" 4. $ ^. d" 3$$% ^"$$$$$ * $e...z$" *c $$ L4F 4P$ $ 4 ""$"F^ "**P"- $ $ 4r4$%.F P $ $ $be$*$e .$Ld% ^ *$. 4$$F JP**" .$*$$bec. ...z$$$$$P$$$bee$$**% d" "" ^*c d "c $ "e. J" .. .... $ "b $ d$$$$$$$ e$$$$$$b$*$. 4" d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ "$c $ 4$% $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ^"b. JF $L $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$F ^$e..z 4$ J"*k ^$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P ^P .$ ^P *b 4$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$F .P .@ d" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ P z$" JF $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ J* -$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r d" dF .$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c. J% $" $" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P*$e$$$% z d" $ d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$**" ^$r^r e" 4F .$ d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r 3r4..$" J$ 4$" .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $" .$$$$b. J$ :$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P.de.zd$ $ ..eue$$$$$(* z$" .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$C$ $ z$P*"""" $$ $d$* $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"JF d$$ $$*" $$ $" :$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" ^$P ^#*$$- .$"3 $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$E $$$$eb zeee$$$$F4F $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$L 4$. ^ ""#$$"" *$$$" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b *" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 4F 4$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"4$""""" $$$$P" $$$$$$$$$$$$P"*$$$$*" 4" .. $ '$$$$$$$$$$F 4$$$e$ 3$P 3$$$$$$$$" 4$$$$$.d$F ^*$$*"*% J . b F $ *. F 4F $ J b 4 L 4b $ J- $ % .F $" d $ $" :F F $ .$ 4- d" d" 3 4P d" $ <$ d" $ d% J$ $ $ 4$$ 4F 4F 4" $ 4 $ :# $ P $ 4P * F 4F 4F 4r d $ 4* $ $ P d" $ 4F 4" d% 4 J $ J% 4 .F $ 4% J 4% d" .$ F $ dF P d" F J$ $$ F dP J $$b L 4P ^F $$$$F * .$ .$ $$$$$$edF 4$$c.d$" $$$$$r 4$$$$$" "**$P |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 Mar 2003 23:33 PST |
Wow, J Philipp That's AMAZING! Can you now do a drawing of Pinky, please? KR Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:42 PST |
Bryan, That certainly would need official authorization from Pink herself! Let me see if I can provide you with an alternative. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:48 PST |
Step away some meters from the monitor please:
*
oO.*'*oxoo *BB'
*O*' 'oW* *BO
*W* ' *BO oo *
*Bo oB''*'BOB **''*o** *o''OxB' *BO B''*.OW'
*Bo oWo' OBW **B* **O ,B* oBO *BO Oo BW*
oBB OWo *OW'**B '*Oo oB' .BB *BO oBxBo''''
'xBx '*oB''OWW OW***O' *O*'*BB' xO* *BO oBW
*xBB 'oW' OBB* *Wo *ooO *O* '*o*x*' *BO BBB
*BWBx,' *WO' oWWB OO*' xOo* .O** oxB, B##* 'WWBBOOW
*****''*' '''' '''' *B*'**OBB ''' '**''
B ,*W* *Bo
B B B B B BB BB BBBBB oxB* 'B*' O O
B B B B BB B B BB B BB 'oOBBBBo*' OO OOO O
Make ascii art from bitmap pics
http://www.haugdahl.com/bmp2txt/bmp2txt.html |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:52 PST |
.,,,,,,,,,,,,
,;%%%%uuuuuuuuuuuuu%%%\
/%%%%%uuuu====####uuuuuu%%%%
/%%%%%uuuu.....===###uuuuu%%%%%%
, '''''\%%%%%uuu....##.===##uuuu%%%%%%%%
,'''''''')####\%u....../==#/uuu%%%%%%%%%%%
,'''''/#########\%mmmmmmmmmmmmm%%%%%%%%%%%;
#\''/##########(mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnu%%'%%%%%%%
###############(mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%'%%%%%%;
u\###########/ (mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%'%%%%%%%%
uuuuuEEE \mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuuu%%'%%%%%%%%%
uuuuuEEE .:::,#u,mmmmnnmmmmmmmmmnuuu%%;; %%%%%%%%%
uuuuuu\##\:::::##uuummmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%;;;; :...%%%%%%
uuuuu\#######/uuuuuuuuuu,mmmmmmnu%%...;;; ::...%%%%
\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu,mmnu/ \...;;; ::...%%%
>####&&################<%%%% \;;;/ ::...%%%
(#####&&&################%%%%%%% ::..%%%
(######&&&&##############(%%%%%%%%%% ::%/
(####&&&&&&#############(%%%%%%%%%%%%%
(#######&&&&&############(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
(#########################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
(# (######################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
(#######################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%(#####################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%(####################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
;%%%%%%; (#################n'%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
(%%%%%%%( ;%nn############nn'%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
;%%%%%%% %%%nnnnnnnnnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@)
\%%%%%; %%%%nnnnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%'%%'n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@)
(%(%/ %%%%%nnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%%%'nnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@
%%%%%%nnnnnn'%%%%%%%%'nnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@
%%%%%%%nnnnnnn(%(%)nnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@)
.,;%%%%%%%%nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@@
,nnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%nnnnnn)nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@)
/nnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%nnnnnnnnnnn)nnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%/ (@@@@)
(uu(uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu/ (uu;;;;;;;;;;;uu)
(uu;;;;;;;;;;uu)
(uuuuuuuuuuuuu)
(uu)(uu)(uu) Susie Oviat |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:57 PST |
..uu.
?$""`?i z'
`M .@" x"
'Z :#" . . f 8M
'&H?` :$f U8 < MP x#'
d#` XM $5. $ M' xM"
.!"> @ 'f`$L:M R.@!`
+` > R X "NXF R"*L
k 'f M "$$ :E 5.
% `~ " ` 'K 'M
.uH 'E `h
.x*` X `
.uf` *
.@8 .
'E9F uf" , ,
9h+" $M eH. 8b. .8 .....
.8` $' M 'E `R;' d?"""`"#
` E @ b d 9R ?* @
> K.zM `%M' 9' Xf .f
; R' 9 M .=`
t M Mx~
@ lR z"
@ ` ;"
`
.u!"`
.x*"`
..+"NP
.z"" ?
M#` 9 , ,
9 M d! ,8P'
R X.:x' R' ,
F F' M R.d'
d P @ E` ,
P ' P N.d'
'' '
ss
X x .
9 .f ! . $b
4; $k / dH $f
'X ;$$ z . MR :$
R M$$, : d9b M' tM
M: #'$L ;' M `8 X MR
`$;t' $F # X ,oR t Q;
$$@ R$ H :RP' $b X @'
9$E @Bd' $' ?X ; W
`M' `$M d$ `E ;.o* :R ..
` ' "' ' @' '$o*"' -Philippe Chaintreuil |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:07 PST |
I sense 500 is coming close. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
500 coming closer. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
500 coming closer every minute. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
Some more to reach 500. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:09 PST |
Getting closer and closer. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 03:37 PST |
Sorry I thought you said PINK FLOYED |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 03:42 PST |
Hi, Smion aka Meklo Now, I've split coffee all over my boardyek And I don't even drink the stuff. Is it infekshus? sgr nayrb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 29 Mar 2003 07:36 PST |
I would love to have the honour of a dance with Pierce Brosnan, but it looks like the lad's plate is full:( |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 07:46 PST |
Hi, Carpediem Please don't be shy. I thought I made it clear that Heather Graham would be made very welcome. Very, very welcome. And Pierce will also be getting plenty of help from me. Please let me know which dances show you at your very best. KR Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 29 Mar 2003 09:32 PST |
Hi Bryan, Well, I would have to say the Waltz, Foxtrot, Tango, Salsa, and the Bolero. And you? Anna |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 09:54 PST |
Hi, Anna (Carpediem) I must be honest ... I have two left feet. And my partners always look (a) embarrassed and/or (b) in pain. That's why I shall get a stunt double ... Ideally, I'd like the guy who did the tap dancing for Richard Gere in 'Chicago' ... However, even though I am useless myself, I adore watching dancing, anything from ballet to tap. KR Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 00:55 PST |
Good morning everyone its 9.55am on this sunday morning |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Mar 2003 01:51 PST |
Good morning, Smion (Kemlo) When you made your last comment, it may have been 9.55 a.m. within the Bucolic Shire of Leicester but the world is round and different people live in different TIME ZONES ... So, it's highly probable that it was actually 10.25 a.m. in Sunny Sussex because we are so much more advanced than you. Sorry, but I thought you would have known that! Too much coffee can make you hallucinate. Rgds Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 06:46 PST |
Hi Bryan The real reason your clock reads 10.25 is that you advanced it half an hour too far last night. please remember to, in the futre, advance or retard the clock only one whole hour at a time. the time is now 3;46 and being Sunday time for my bath must go Rgs Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Mar 2003 07:15 PST |
Hi, Simon But I don't even have a clock! (I rely on Daisy) I'm also surprised that you are taking a bath already ... It's not the First of the month until Tuesday (or so Daisy tells me.) Rgds B & D |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 10:17 PST |
Hi Bryan Nearest sunday to the end of the month. winter schedule. In the summer because I go swimming every week I don't need a bath so often. Now Bryan, Don't take this the wrong way but, I think, the reason Daisy yawns so much is that she finds living with you boreing. Now own up, you do read the scripts out to her for a reaction, Yes? Mmm I thought so. Sincerly yours Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 01:33 PST |
It has been suggested that the Masked Ball should be held in Manheim, PA. Would anyone know if there is a suitable facility there? Preferably a 17th Century Royal Palace that has been lovingly maintained by a succession of careful owners. Will ALL previous Commentators (and any new ones) please say 'Yes' or 'No'to this suggestion. Many thanks! By George, we'll pass 1,000 yet. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: anlon-ga on 01 Apr 2003 08:02 PST |
Alack, alas, no castles suitable in Manheim, PA, but we do have two other lovely facilities to choose from: A Renaissance Faire grounds, compleat with anachronistic turkey legs and jousters, and/or the Auto Auction, which recently surpassed Chicago/O'Hare's lots as the largest carpark in the world (or so says local lore). I hear there's a haunted graveyard or two, as well. And cows. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 09:52 PST |
Hi, Anlon So Manheim, PA would not be the ideal venue then? I can't imagine why the Dance Committee would have recommended such a place. How about Wernerville, PA? Is that any better? Incidentally, I used to fly into Philadelphia frequently to visit a plant that my company owned in a place called Jamestown, NJ. Now, what did W C Fields say about Philadelphia? KR Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: anlon-ga on 01 Apr 2003 15:21 PST |
Wernersville, PA might suit better, as there is a lovely YMCA camp there. Is 40 minutes from Chez Anlon, though. Also, still no chateau, though certainly enough accomodation for the crowds drawn by the event of the season. The woods would be suitable for ghost story telling over the fire and s'mores. Not sure how this will work, though, as some mask materials might be highly flammable. Hmmm. Am working on costume for ball, sure to delight visitors from near and far. Sorry to hear about your frequent flights to Philly and travels to NJ. Hope your company paid for the therapy? Regards Anlon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 01 Apr 2003 17:45 PST |
kemlo said: "My previous computer had a cup holder that slid out from the front, a well thought out design. My current one (an iMac) does not. Any one any suggestions on the problem? Is it worth posting this as a qestion?" Just use the CD-ROM tray. That'll be $2, please... : ) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 01 Apr 2003 21:39 PST |
A picture from the ball: http://www.gregwilliamsphotography.com/portfolio/reportage/images/l4.jpg |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 22:06 PST |
Wow, Googlenut, Many thanks A piccy of you and me together ... That should cause a lot of comment(s), PLEASE! Don't you think we make a great couple? KR Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:24 PST |
What about Mannheim, Germany, then? |
| Subject:
...
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:25 PST |
Any comments? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:25 PST |
Should be a nice town. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:26 PST |
Can't load the Mannheim website at the moment. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Apr 2003 03:12 PST |
Hi, Anlon I am still undergoing therapy ... But should be OK on the night. KR Awestruck |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:09 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AAMOF - As A Matter Of Fact |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:10 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAIAC - As Far As I Am Concerned |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:10 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAICT - As Far As I Can Tell |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:11 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAIK - As Far As I Know |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:11 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AISB - As I Said Before |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:12 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AISI - As I See It |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:13 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AWGTHTGTATA - Are We Going To Have To Go Through All This Again |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:13 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AWHFY - Are We Having Fun Yet |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:14 PST |
Internet Abbreviations BBIAB - Be Back In A Bit |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:14 PST |
Internet Abbreviations BION - Believe It Or Not |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Apr 2003 10:23 PST |
Right ... Now, it's gloves off time ... In short, BRIBERY From now on, every future Commentator will receive: A CONTAINER-full of VINTAGE VIRTUAL CHARDONNAY. And it's ready to drink NOW. So, c'mon folks and amaze your friends! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 03 Apr 2003 14:11 PST |
Sorry Bryan But some of us are under eighteen and are not allowed to drink alcohol by their Mum. Regards Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Apr 2003 22:24 PST |
Simon We all knew that you had not yet turned 18. Which raises an interesting point ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Apr 2003 14:24 PST |
In answer to one of many un-thought of qestions http://www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au/usrpages/collect/1950s.htm |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 05 Apr 2003 09:11 PST |
pbp... Your remark about future commentators reminded me of a story... Walter Cronkite was, at some point, in love with a Sweet Potato. Truly a beauty, she was, and Walter adored her with all his heart. She was the daughter of a Russett Potato and an Irish Cobbler. When his ardor became unreconcilable, Walter approached her father, the Russett Potato, and asked for her hand in marriage, but her father responded starchily that this could never be. Stunned, Walter tried to reason with the thick-skinned father, noting that he was well-off, well-known and that he didn't think his age was a problem. But the father was adamant. Finally, Walter pleaded with him, asking what the obstacle might be. The father peremptorily stated "I just won't have my daughter marrying some common 'tater". |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 10:51 PST |
Many thanks for the link, Simon (Kemlo) ... "The page cannot be displayed" Although I am almost sure that I've seen it somewhere before. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 10:53 PST |
O, Sublime One ... What can I say? Just keep 'em coming and we'll get there yet. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 05 Apr 2003 12:33 PST |
sublime1: Do you know how old that *common 'tater* joke is? I first heard it in the late 1930s...using Gabriel Heatter or Walter Winchell. Regards, knowitall22 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 21:06 PST |
Hi, knowitall22 You heard it in the 1930's? Now let's see ... That must make you ... Got it! You've now turned 40 ... Am I right? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 06 Apr 2003 09:03 PDT |
So, who's going to take us past the 500 mark? I'm not very good at maths ... would that be the half way stage? MY MONEY IS RIDING ON KEMLO THE MAGNIFICENT ... C'mon Kemlo ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 11:28 PDT |
IH Bryan , try the music on this on, its great'h ttp://www.mumbaipolice.com/ olmeK sdrageR |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 11:41 PDT |
My mother was visiting one time when I was online. I remarked to her that the computer was running a little slow today. Her solution? Oil it. You can imagine how I cringe every time I think of it. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 12:21 PDT |
Fact: The Science Museum sells chocolate bars shaped like floppy disks. Fact: Three year old kids see Uncle Simon using a floppy to play games. Fact: Computers are warm inside...even some quite expensive computers. I don't want to talk about it. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 06 Apr 2003 13:28 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #487... and now it has happened. (#485 was unavailable). I have not considered changing my nickname from snapanswer-ga, though I might consider a name like slowcomment-ga. ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 06 Apr 2003 14:28 PDT |
probonopublico; Oh, how I wish you were right about my just turning 40!!! Turned 75 in Jan 2003. Yes, I did hear the common 'tater joke many years ago. Most jokes are of course current, but on rare occasions some REALLY OLD jokes are recycled, which is fine...if you haven't heard it, it is funny. Thanks for de-aging me...I needed that. Regards, knowitall22 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 11:29 PDT |
Suprised that Probonopublllllllllllico has not been here. His actions have given me an idea, but then plagerism is my middle name. ( at my age my brane has not devoloped enough for original thought ) Kemlo [:+D |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 14:55 PDT |
Almost there |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 14:57 PDT |
The following is a large collection of stories and anecdotes about clueless computer users. It's a baffling phenomenon that in today's society an individual, who might in other circumstances be considered smart and wise, can sit down in front of a computer screen and instantly lose every last shred of common sense he ever possessed. Complicate this phenomenon with a case of "computerphobia," and you end up with tech support personnel having phone conversations that are funny in retrospect but seem like perfectly valid motives for wild machine gun shooting sprees at the time. You will read stories in this file that will convince you that among the human race are human-shaped artichokes futilely attempting to break the highly regarded social convention that vegetables should not operate electronic equipment. And yet, amidst the vast, surging quantities of stupidity are perfectly excusable technological mishaps -- but that are amusing nonetheless. After all, even the best of us engages in a little brainless folly every once in a while. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 15:01 PDT |
Me: "Hi. I need a 25 pin RS-232 cable." * Sales Clerk 1: "What do you need it for?" * Me: "I need to plug a VT100 into a modem. I have both the VT100 and the modem, I just need at 25 pin male/female cable with RS-232 connectors." * Sales Clerk 1: "Let me get my manager." Huh? * Sales Clerk 1: in background: "I have a guy here who wants to plug his VCR into a modem." The sales clerk returned with another. * Sales Clerk 2: "Hello, sir. You can't attach a VCR to a modem." * Me: "That is not what I am trying to do. I need a 25-pin RS-232 cable -- that's all. Do you have cables for plugging into modems?" * Sales Clerk 2: "What do you want to plug into the modem?" * Me: "A VT100. It is a terminal. You plug it into a computer over a serial line, frequently a modem. I just need a 25-pin cable to go from the unit to the modem." * Sales Clerk 2: (to Sales Clerk 1) "He doesn't have a VCR. He wants to plug a VTR into his modem, so it is all right." Sales Clerk 1 handed me a cable. * Me: "This is a 9-pin cable. I need a 25 pin cable." * Sales Clerk 2: "Most PC's have 9 pins on their serial cards." * Me: "I am not attaching a PC. I am attaching a VT100. There are 25 pins on it -- it needs to plug into a 25 pin connector." * Sales Clerk 2: "Then use the small end to plug into your modem." * Me: "There are 25 pins on the modem as well. Do you have any 25 pin cables? All I need is a cable with 25 pins at each end." * Sales Clerk 2: "This is a 25 pin cable." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 15:21 PDT |
And now a true story, Many years ago I while visiting the Leicester City library I wanted to read Cider with Rosie By Laurie Lee. looking through the card index I found it filed permanently in the wine making section. Of course being the responsible borrower that I was I immediately took the book out and then round to the local newspaper. They were mildly amused, took my photo and story, and published it. I still don't understand why the library staff were so hostile. Regards Kemlo. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:18 PDT |
I see you need 7 more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:19 PDT |
I see you need 6 more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:19 PDT |
I see you need 5 more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you need 4 more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you 3 need more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you need 2 more comments to get to 500! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:21 PDT |
BIN-GO! 500 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 08 Apr 2003 21:23 PDT |
Half-time's over. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 23:55 PDT |
There you are PBP I always said yu'd make it i've every confidence in you. Another two months. RGDS KML |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:44 PDT |
"Sticks in a bundle are unbreakable." Bondei proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:46 PDT |
For probonopubllico: "Copying everyone else all the time, the monkey one day cut his throat." Zulu proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:47 PDT |
"Happiness can grow from only a little contentment." Pygmy proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:47 PDT |
"Always being in a hurry does not prevent death, neither does going slowly prevent living." Ibo proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:48 PDT |
"If you understand the beginning well, the end will not trouble you." Ashanti proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:49 PDT |
"When the mouse laughs at the car, there is a hole nearby." Benin proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:49 PDT |
"Pride only goes the length one can spit." Congo proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:50 PDT |
"Everybody loves a fool, but nobody wants him for a son." Malinke proverb |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 09 Apr 2003 21:17 PDT |
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 09 Apr 2003 23:22 PDT |
Has everybody given up on this honorable goal? We're only about halfway there! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:04 PDT |
I haven't given up. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Matter of fact, I think we are all motivated enough to take it to 10,000 comments. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Or even 100,000. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Or 1,000,000. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
10,000,000? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
Nah, that'd be unrealistic. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
OK, I'm awaiting my "Cannot Process" message any minute... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
Nope, nothing yet... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
Still processing... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
This is almost like Internet chat, except I'm talking alone. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
Maybe the bug has been fixed? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
I wonder. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
OK, let's just say the bug is fixed. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:49 PDT |
526 comments |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:50 PDT |
527 comments |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:51 PDT |
528 comments, keep em comming ppl...... pls |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 13:21 PDT |
Sorrie that was just Little Robin playin arundwith my puter |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 14 Apr 2003 20:23 PDT |
the multiple comments are a little cheap though. how about this...if you were stranded on a desert island, and could eat only one vegetable for the rest of your life, what would it be? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Apr 2003 17:06 PDT |
ummm...peanuts : ) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: crocokoala-ga on 24 Apr 2003 16:53 PDT |
still going? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: crocokoala-ga on 24 Apr 2003 16:53 PDT |
yup |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 29 Apr 2003 19:55 PDT |
Hey Probonopublico, you've been very quiet lately. I just found this one and couldn't let it pass without putting in my two bob's worth and come up with comment 534. I'm definitely the Vicar of Dibley *sigh* and if we can get Lozza Olivier up and running again, maybe he could play you. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Apr 2003 06:02 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Mum! I didn't know anyone cared ... Do you know that you are the ONLY person who has enquired about my well being? The truth of the matter is that I have been in a sulk. You see, a little bird told me that you were planning a big bash this coming Saturday and I was so hoping to get an invite. But when none came, I took to my bed and cried endlessly. However, I now feel better knowing that you (or you alter ego) will be coming to my masked ball. Kindest regards Probo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 30 Apr 2003 06:33 PDT |
Awww, poor Probono Sure. Come to the party, it's going to be a blast. Can't believe I'm married to a 50 year old bloke. That makes me ... well ... that confirms the fact I was a child bride! BYO Chardonnay. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Apr 2003 07:17 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Mum Many thanks for the invite. I shall be there on Saturday for sure. Earlier today, I was doing my Satcho impersonation and it went down really well. WARNING: Once I've got the mike in my hand, they can never get me off the stage. Lots of the Very Best The Masked One |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Apr 2003 13:12 PDT |
Hi PBO Nice to see your back . I for one have missed you and your pithy, enlightning and educating comments. What was it, twentyeight days stoppage of leave? Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 30 Apr 2003 17:34 PDT |
Satchmo, eh? We-e-e-ell hello-o-o-o-o, Probo, We-e-e-ell hello-o-o-o-o, Probo, It's so nice to have you back where you belo-o-ong, etc etc Polish that horn, Probo, you're due on stage in Oz on Sat'dee night! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: scriptor-ga on 02 May 2003 05:35 PDT |
Have I already mentioned that, in my most humble opinion, "There's No Room To Rhumba In A Sportscar" and "Song Of The Shrimp" are among the worst songs Elvis Presley ever recorded? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 02 May 2003 05:40 PDT |
Pith and vinegar, I'd say. LOOK! 540 comments so far with this posting. I believe you're going to do it, you old Pro, you. As for gala invitations, when you're ready for a party in south, you just let me know and I'll hold one in your honor. Complete with beer and cheese fries. :) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 May 2003 06:49 PDT |
Hi, Journalist, Honey Many thanks for the encouraging words and, especially, for the invite. If you are holding a party then I'll swim across that Swanee River and I don't mind how many man-eating crocodiles I have to eat along the way. Actually, it's Daisy's birthday next Friday, the 8th ... She will be 13 ... And I am throwing a masked ball for her as a sort of dress rehearsal for the real thing. She looks really nice in an Elvis mask and I am going to suggest to her that she wears one permanently. Get that beer and stuff ready. The Old Pro |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 08 May 2003 15:21 PDT |
(Proper Limerick Style, please. And only one more line per comment also.) A researcher once asked for some comments..... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 08 May 2003 22:40 PDT |
So sorry, liner, but I must point out that to get proper limerick form, you have to lead off with a line that scans: da-DUM-da-da-DUM-da-da-DUM. (That's for lines 1, 2, and 5, of course; 3 and 4 must go da-DUM-da-da-DUM.) The first suggestion below is conventional but boring; the others aren't much better, but they're a start. There once was a researcher who A researcher known as Pro-Bo A Google-A. guy known as Pro A researcher said, "Let us try [Next?] Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 May 2003 22:50 PDT |
Hi, Liner & Apteryx Sorry ... But you are BOTH wrong! I am not a Researcher. I have referred your aspersions to my lawyers ... Or would you like to settle out of court? But, how about this ... There was a young lady called Pink And so on ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 09 May 2003 23:01 PDT |
Oh, DEAR! I got too distracted by the point about limerick form to realize that the content was incorrect--like that old riddle about where the survivors are buried. I do regret my error. But I think liner's idea, Probono, was that the verse be about *you*--not Pink or any of our other esteemed GA celebrities. So--"A Google-A. guy known as Pro" still fits, but the rest won't do. Can anyone help? Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 10 May 2003 22:05 PDT |
! !
!! !!
!!! !!!
O ' O
W
^ ^
"A A"
@@@@@ @@@@@
Q~~~~~~~~~~~~Q
p q
Hope your face is feeling better, Probonopublico. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 12 May 2003 08:44 PDT |
A Google-A guy known as Pro... a party decided to throw... How odd that he asked that the ball should be masked for researchers he didn't know! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 May 2003 09:18 PDT |
The Google Guy known as 'Pro' Is not totally stupid, you know He hates those admiring glances From dames who fancy their chances So he dons a mask wherever he go. (I'm no poet) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 May 2003 10:30 PDT |
Nearly therre not long now |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 12 May 2003 23:08 PDT |
That was very brave, PBP... Poetry obviously isn't your strong point, and yet you risked possible ridicule and ha-razz-ment to give it your best shot. I can only applaud your chutzpah, and express my deepest respect... (Along with the fact that, if your dancing rhythm isn't any better than your poetic meter, you can drop the mask...they'll run from you in droves when you step all over their feet.....) :razz: :p I apologize if this arouses any deep-seated neuroses... Your fan... sublime1-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 May 2003 00:26 PDT |
Hi, O Sublime One You've got in in 1 ... a sublime 1, no less. My dancing is every bit as bad as my poetry. In fact, you were kinder than most. That's appreciated. PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: johnfrommelbourne-ga on 16 May 2003 04:03 PDT |
I cant believe people are still making comments when I would have thought the novelty of the exercise would have worn off ages ago. it is now the 16th of may where I am, Australia, so will be interested to see if i am the only comenter for this particular day?? John from Melbourne |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 May 2003 04:55 PDT |
Hi, John of Melbourne This is my first visit and I thought that this was a good place to start. I live in the UK. I wonder are there any other UK users ... Or am I the first? Mik |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 16 May 2003 08:34 PDT |
Are we still trying to get this to 1000 or have we stoped? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 May 2003 08:44 PDT |
Hi, Farzin With your help, we'll top 1,000 easily. Many thanks! Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 16 May 2003 09:33 PDT |
Dear Bryan, Thanks for your answer. By the way I have a question. How do the Google Answers people (people who answer the questions) get their job? Your truly, Farzin |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ragingacademic-ga on 16 May 2003 12:39 PDT |
I don't see 1,000 yet.... Tom Hanks... ragingacademic |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 18 May 2003 08:30 PDT |
Re: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=205359 I think you could make a killing by creating accessible versions of classic operas, by casting them with current pop/pop-rap stars. Imagine the powerful performance of Britney Spears as Tosca. In Sync (collectively of course) playing Figaro. The very thought of Nelly's rendition of the great aria from Pagliacci brings me to tears... Or, you could hire Rich Little to do voice impersonations of the great mimes. - Hammer |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 May 2003 15:10 PDT |
Bryan The correct spelling is "PARROTS ". Regards Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 May 2003 15:48 PDT |
We are still amused. http://www.mortalwombat.com/Image/We_Are_Amused.jpg ~Pink |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: willie-ga on 20 May 2003 07:59 PDT |
And just in case you need another comment like a hole in the head, here's my contribution to "The End of the Pier" show I volunteer to play ukelele and do risque little "nudge nudge wink wink say no more squire" numbers in between mother-in-law and little winkle jokes. I've even got the garish stripey suit :) willie-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: helpandrersearch-ga on 20 May 2003 08:27 PDT |
I dont think you could get 10000 comments. Too mo=uch. Nobody would do that. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 May 2003 11:49 PDT |
I'm not normally much of a party girl, but I have got to attend, in order to see Willie doing his "nudge nudge wink wink say no more squire" numbers in between my mother-in-law and somebody's little winkle. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 May 2003 23:37 PDT |
Hi, Everyone And many thnaks (why am I always writing thnaks?) for your comments. Yes, Willie certainly will be a hoot, provided he leaves his bagpipes in Edinburgh. As for Helpandrersearch (now there's a handle that rolls off the tongue), I had only targeted 1,000 Comments, not 10,000. But, with your help, who knows what is possible? All the Very Best Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 May 2003 01:50 PDT |
No. 566: My suggestion always has to do with lots of good food and lots of laughs. That is, a reveu with the participation of the 5-stars-band, a magician (who? Scriptor, of course), a bird (that's me), a rabbit (that's pinkie), and some fine lady to saw in half. Pierce Brosnan *must* participate in our great gala event. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 May 2003 02:13 PDT |
No. 567: hammer, you are tacky. I like it. Would there be plaid pants dancers in the back? Hammer's suggestion made me think, though. What if we create a show with all the shining one-hit-wonders? All those really bad actors? I wish Troy Mcclure was available. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 21 May 2003 10:22 PDT |
I have noticed that cruise-control will not work in reverse gear on my current car(Kia Magentis), as I find this very important aid to my driving can you point me in the direction of a manufacturer or model suitable to my needs? Regards Kemlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 25 May 2003 06:09 PDT |
*I'm* not tacky. Mandy Patinkin's album ... now THAT was tacky. - Hammer |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 May 2003 11:09 PDT |
Dear Brayn How did your performance go on the night? Are you going to post the script for those of us unable to be present. Best Wishes Simon |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 May 2003 01:21 PDT |
Hi, Symon Regret to say that the production lacked polish: too many fluffed lines and screw ups and one of the readers was totally out of his depth. But the audience laughed in all the right places and clapped enthusiastically at the end. Also, I can now see how it can be improved. Many thanks for your interest. The Brayn |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 May 2003 05:54 PDT |
One of the most perceptive of the army of Researchers has pointed out that this question appears to be stagnating and we are still a long way away from the target. C'mon now EVERYBODY ... One great big effort and let's send the Comments up into the stratosphere. Many thanks in anticipation. Bryan 1111 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 May 2003 10:44 PDT |
Here you are then Bryan. Comment number six hundred (700) You can sirtanly count on me My mother always said I looked like a real count Regards Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,001 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 05 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
A sunday school teacher was discussing the ten commandments with her five and six year olds. After explaining the commandment to "honor thy father and thy mother," she asked "is there a commandment that teaches us how to treat our brothers and sisters?" Without missing a beat one little boy answered, "thou shall not kill." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:39 PDT |
I will not add a comment just to add a comment. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:40 PDT |
And I will not add a comment again. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:40 PDT |
Nor will I deign to add a comment this time either. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Jun 2003 22:36 PDT |
Eye Liner! Do you only post one liners? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 06 Jun 2003 10:49 PDT |
test |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 06 Jun 2003 12:05 PDT |
1: Probonopublico--- 2: Yes |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 07 Jun 2003 08:33 PDT |
No comment... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nelson-ga on 07 Jun 2003 12:41 PDT |
Am I allowed to comment again? Well, I just did! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Jun 2003 22:39 PDT |
A Request for Clarification to Nelson Dear Nelson Do you still love me? Lady Hamilton |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 08 Jun 2003 00:24 PDT |
Could be close, I would hate to miss it. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 08 Jun 2003 00:25 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #585... and now it has happened. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 12 Jun 2003 13:10 PDT |
Just dropping in to say hello. How are things PB? --- Jinx ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 Jun 2003 22:33 PDT |
High Jinx Where have you been? Every time I think of Halle Berry (most of the time) I think of you. Missing you already ... Piers |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 13 Jun 2003 08:58 PDT |
Hello PB, Unfortunately, I am only a part time researcher. I'm stuck in a boring corporate job. I do try to drop in on GA whenever I can, it's much more fun than my fulltime job. Googlenut (AKA Jinx AKA Halle) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 14 Jun 2003 22:11 PDT |
If there are 500 Researchers and, say, at least as many Questioners ... Can someone please tell me why the number of comments posted here is still less than 1,000? Someone is obviously not pulling his/her weight? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 15 Jun 2003 00:28 PDT |
I don't think there's any lack of willingness, megagaga, or there wouldn't be 590 already (even though it's true that some folks have shamelessly inflated the numbers with obvious contrivances and repetition). I think the word just isn't getting out; after all, the challenge is four months old. What we need is the equivalent of the guy with the sandwich-board walking up and down in front of the showroom: people have to start putting links and cross-references to this page into their questions and answers. With some sort of legitimate tie-in, of course. How do you like that idea, Bryan? Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 15 Jun 2003 04:12 PDT |
Hey there Probo, honey, how's life? It's been a while so I thought I'd drop in and add another comment to the collection. I'm going to a trivia night in a couple of weeks and I'd like to avoid looking like a twit. Can you or anyone out there suggest a 'must know' question ( and answer) that every self respecting trivia night contestant should know? Something specific to Awstralya would be grand. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jun 2003 06:14 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Out Momma Life's great but I still have a hangover from that shindig you threw way back. I'm sorry but I can't think of any Trivialities that will make you shine ... so you are own your own ... Unless you want me to slip over and whisper in your ear. Usual place? All the best from PB now in Angleterre. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:29 PDT |
G |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
o |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
g |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
l |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
e |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:31 PDT |
Oops, Either I don't know how to spell or one of my comments got screwed up. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jun 2003 22:49 PDT |
Hi, Bowler Your spelling's great ... It's the G****e Bot that messes stuff around. From One Who Kowns |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Jun 2003 04:16 PDT |
The cynics reckoned that the Comments would never reach 600. But NOBODY would have guessed that this landmark would have reached by Little Me. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jun 2003 09:48 PDT |
#601...here's another one! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: uniace-ga on 17 Jun 2003 19:03 PDT |
Just registered w/ GA and thought I'd do my part. No idea who'd play me though. Maybe I'll ask my girlfriend and post again later |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 18 Jun 2003 21:07 PDT |
Yep, usual place. Just above my neck. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:13 PDT |
What an amazing batch of comments. Here, Bryan. This is for you, for making it all possible: http://www.mortalwombat.com/Special/Award.jpg ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:40 PDT |
#605...& i forgot to answer the question before! okay, so it'd be vivica a. fox for me. & as for the hubby, vin diesel or lenny kravitz. (or both! i mean, hey, as long as we're in fantasyland here....) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:44 PDT |
or, hmmm... in that case, maybe i'll just play *myself* & merely cast the *hubby* role! >:-) yeah, that'd definitely work! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Jun 2003 22:53 PDT |
Gee, Pinky ... Many thanks. I will treasure the award, forever. I am truly humbled. KR PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 29 Jun 2003 12:27 PDT |
608-here's another one for ya.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Jul 2003 16:41 PDT |
There was a tradesman, a painter called Wayne, who was very interested in making a penny where he could, so he often would thin down paint to make it go a wee bit further. As it happened, he got away with this for some time, but eventually the Baptist Church decided to do a big restoration job on the painting of one of their biggest buildings. Wayne put in a bid, and because his price was so low, he got the job. And so he set to erecting the trestles and setting up the planks, and buying the paint and, yes, I am sorry to say, thinning it down with turpentine. Well, Wayne was up on the scaffolding, painting away, the job nearlycompleted when suddenly there was a horrendous clap of thunder, and the sky opened, the rain poured down, washing the thinned paint from all over the church and knocking Wayne clear off the scaffold to land on the lawn among the gravestones, surrounded by telltale puddles of the thinned and useless paint. Wayne was no fool. He knew this was a judgment from the Almighty, so he got on his knees and cried: "Oh, God! Forgive me! What should I do?" And from the thunder, a mighty voice spoke... Repaint! Repaint! And thin no more!" |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 06 Jul 2003 10:47 PDT |
Will this thing run and run? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:37 PDT |
I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:39 PDT |
Hmmm... It's not letting me add additional comments saying: I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. Let's see if this one takes... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:42 PDT |
Yep. It took. Must be some kind of anti-flooding script preventing the addition of comments with the same content, but it seems I can add it to comments with new content. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:43 PDT |
4. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:43 PDT |
5. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:45 PDT |
For those who are wondering about my strange behavior, please see the rating remarks on this question: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=225712 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:46 PDT |
6. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:48 PDT |
Okay, I'm starting to feel like Bart Simpson now, so I'm gonna grab my skateboard and split.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 07 Jul 2003 13:46 PDT |
Bryan At the start of the Great war the government froze all bank accounts held in Britain and the Empire. Regardless of which bank it was held in. However, London branches of German banks would have held the accounts of neutral foreigners as well as British subjects. Because of this British managers were put in place under the supervision of the Bank of England. Also a commission was set up to examine the claims of, and pay compensation to foreigners who were unfairly treated. This commission was still in existence in 1939! Regards Kemlo |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Jul 2003 07:56 PDT |
Hi, Simon Many thanks for the info on German banks during WW1. I never knew that! Regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 10 Jul 2003 06:44 PDT |
Just received an email from a friend containing the following pearl of wisdom (the email, not the friend): "There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." Read it and thought of my manic, scary patchworking friend and my obsessive, relentless junk collecting neighbour -- and then it reminded me that I haven't been to visit your question (qestion?)in, ooh, days. Anyway, it gave me an excuse to drop by and say 'g'day honey'. That's 621 and counting ... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 10 Jul 2003 07:58 PDT |
D'day Stressed Out Mum Good to hear from you again. Have you pursued the trivial yet? And, if so, did you amaze everyone ... or not? Kindest regards Big B Note to EVERYONE ... tell your friends to Comment NOW! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 10 Jul 2003 08:15 PDT |
Commenting now! THX1138 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 10 Jul 2003 11:15 PDT |
How many comments do we have now? I promised I would add Comment #666 if nobody else does, and I want to make sure I do this right. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 10 Jul 2003 11:15 PDT |
Ingore the question. The answer's at the top of the page. Duh! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 10 Jul 2003 16:54 PDT |
Hey Probo, yeah, we pursued the trivial and ended up coming third which out of 20 tables, satisfied our competitive spirit to some extent and we each won a Toblerone and a lottery ticket. We also won most of the raffles (dunno how, just call me lucky) and my sister shamed us all by winning the bubble gum blowing competition. She's on the wrong side of 50 and a very eccentric, bespectacled unbelievably clever thing who stood up there with all the dills who couldn't answer the questions and did her thing. It finally burst and went all over her glasses and was the clear winner. Oh the shame. There were some dodgy answers though, e.g. Who sang, "always look on the bright side of life" and everyone answered Brian, but of course it wasn't as any devout Monty Pythoner would know. We challenged loudly and got the point but everyone else also got a point so it didn't matter. I felt someone whispering in my ear and turned hopefully, thinking it might be dear Bryan coming to render trivial assistance but it was just my sister practising her bubble gum blowing technique. See you later in the 600s. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:41 PDT |
EEEP! I was having so much fun reading all the comments that I forgot to post a comment! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:46 PDT |
I signed up just so I could contribute to this cascade of comments--coincidentally coming across countless creative quips as I scrolled--(I consider myself quite content.) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:49 PDT |
And, if possible, I'd like to be portrayed by a melange of Leoni, Delany, Anderson, Clinton, & Rabbit--brainy broads at large. (That's Chelsea, not Hilary, for those who might care...) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Jul 2003 09:50 PDT |
Hi, Angely Many thanks for accepting the invite. I believe that you are the first to nominate the five people selected. However, it would help if you could identify which bit is to come from where. Pamela Anderson I can guess; Rabbit must be the tail; Chelsea Clinton the hair ... but the others? Wow! What a melange ... I can see that you are going to be the Belle of the Ball. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: skinnamarink-ga on 11 Jul 2003 22:44 PDT |
Thanks for the clarification Angley, I dread to think what Bill might have contributed. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 12 Jul 2003 00:47 PDT |
632: here i am, dropping by to add another comment.... stressedmum, i laffed aloud about the "fine line" comment. yes, it certainly seems appropriate w/me & this particular question! :) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:11 PDT |
I |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:12 PDT |
hope |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:12 PDT |
that |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
this |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
effort |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
of |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
mine |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
will |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
be |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:15 PDT |
somewhat |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:15 PDT |
helpful |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:16 PDT |
in |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:17 PDT |
the |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:17 PDT |
group |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Jul 2003 07:15 PDT |
Hi, Ravuri Sorry, I missed that ... Would you mind repeating your comments? Kindest regards Bryan (Is 650 in sight? Or is 650 in sight? Or should that be a new question?) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 13 Jul 2003 11:40 PDT |
There sure will be a lot. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 20:40 PDT |
Okay, it's 649. Hold that thought... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 20:42 PDT |
Ta da! 650. Thank you, thank you |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 21:02 PDT |
I love this question! It's a bit like a comfy, not too tidy communal lounge room where people drop in and have a quick chat and a virtual cuppa then off they go again. And probo's such a congenial host. But then we'd expect nothing less from Pierce Brosnan, would we? Ah, is that the time? Gotta go and pretend that I'm working. Deadline's at 4.00pm so what am I doing here? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:34 PDT |
to |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:37 PDT |
effort to |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:37 PDT |
reach |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:38 PDT |
one |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:38 PDT |
thousand |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:39 PDT |
comments. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:53 PDT |
That reminds me of the classic Bob & Ray routine, "Slow Talkers of America." A comedy classic! If you haven't heard it, see if your local library has Bob & Ray on tape. I would have continued in the one-word-at-a-time format, but I didn't want to take away the pleasure of someone who wants to post comment #666... All The Best, ravuri-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:03 PDT |
WHAT |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:05 PDT |
WHAT IS |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:06 PDT |
WHAT IS SO |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:08 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:10 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:12 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:14 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING SIX |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:16 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY SIX COMMENTS ON THIS QESTION ? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 14 Jul 2003 21:13 PDT |
It's scary! Just a moment, there's someone coming down my chimney .... What am I saying? I don't have a chimney. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 14 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
Hokay--Pam Anderson! That'd be cool--but no, sadly, Mr. Bryan, Sir (may I call you Bryan? With a 'y'?), that particular combination of names, (all of whom I have been compared to from time to time), should read thusly: Tea Leoni, Dana Delaney, Gillian Anderson, Chelsea Clinton, and Jessica Rabbit. Go figure. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 15 Jul 2003 03:21 PDT |
Hi, Angely YES ... Please call me Bryan with a 'Y' Sounds to me as though you're pretty OK yourself and that any substitute would be a disappointment. But, as it's a masked ball anyway, who's going to know? Looking forward to meeting you soon. Kindest regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:07 PDT |
This is 670. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:07 PDT |
And the 671st.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:08 PDT |
672nd already. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:08 PDT |
673rd... anyone else? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:46 PDT |
Hey, I was going to post comment 666! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 16 Jul 2003 08:13 PDT |
You want Aussies? You got one. G'day Probo. Is the masked ball still a happenin' thang? If so, I can't remember who I originally said I'd come as so I'll come along as Muriel in Muriel's Wedding. Or maybe Helen Porter Mitchell who was, as you surely know, Dame Nellie Melba. I could say I'd come along as Nicole Kidman, but no-one would believe me! No, definitely Muriel material. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 16 Jul 2003 08:37 PDT |
Mvguy, Did you mean 666 as sexsexsex? ;) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 16 Jul 2003 09:49 PDT |
Will the ball be in honor of Pierce Brosnan's award from the Queen? Britain to Honor Actor Pierce Brosnan http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/entertainment/6300914.htm |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jul 2003 10:03 PDT |
Hi, Stressed One Nicole Kidman can come anyway. Seems like you, Muriel and Nikky will be the only two Aussies attending. Unless Chips Rafferty can get his act together. Do you remember Chips? High, Jinx Piers is getting the award on MY recommendation. After all, I don't want a nobody to represent me at the Masked Ball. Rgds PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 16 Jul 2003 14:56 PDT |
just dropping by to add another comment. i'm so amused at how pb posts all those other questions JUST to mention THIS one! :-) |
| Subject:
THIS Poor thing is losing steam...
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 16 Jul 2003 16:27 PDT |
Maybe you need KEYWORDS that make people find it. Like Dressed like a Lactotarian... Or feeling my oats... Or "Pull My Finger"... or watercress... or Free... or going, going, gone or.... OH what's the use? It's just a silly old wish of PROBONOPUBLICO. (Exactly... who the heck is that?) Maybe played by the "Player" Judge Wapner? |
| Subject:
Judge Wapner?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 16 Jul 2003 16:32 PDT |
I know I am getting older but I aint that old! Guess we better stick with "the Cocker". |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:52 PDT |
...back to add another one! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:52 PDT |
...and another! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:53 PDT |
...and another one! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:53 PDT |
...and yet another! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
...and still another! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
okay, |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:55 PDT |
enough |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:55 PDT |
of |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:56 PDT |
this! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:57 PDT |
no |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:57 PDT |
more |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:58 PDT |
comments |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:58 PDT |
from |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 18 Jul 2003 19:56 PDT |
me! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 18 Jul 2003 20:03 PDT |
hey, is there a limit to the number of comments a person can post, in a 24-hour-or-so period? it let me post 13 of my last ones, one right after the other; then it wouldn't let me post any more until the next day. i even tried to post a comment on an entirely different question besides this one, & it STILL wouldn't let me! this happen to anyone else??? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Jul 2003 03:45 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 Many thanks for your support ... And your interesting observation. There is actually a Secret Police Force called GoogleBot. It's attached to MI5 (which is now run by NSA) and it patrols Cyberspace, looking for ... well ... people such as yourself. Everyone in the know suspected that something was going to blow up when the dreaded number 666 had been reached ... And now we know. Your sacrifice will not be in vain. And, don't worry, Tony Blair will mount a full scale enquiry. Regards PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:05 PDT |
vinsvixen2... Yes...if you do a page search on 'Tipperary', you will see the beginning of a string of 12 comments I was able to make before being 'cut off' like some overindulging lush. I suspect it is some sort of script to prevent 'flooding' - a term used in chat settings to indicate repeated posts by one individual which have a disruptive effect on the chat process. Since this is not a chat setting, as such, I don't know that repeated posts here represent the same inconvenience to others that they would in chat, but I suppose the setting of limits in this venue is not without some value as well. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:06 PDT |
That said... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:07 PDT |
I'm claiming the distinction of posting comment #700... : ) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:43 PDT |
Ooooh, 701 comments. Way to go, probo. We're starting to break through the clouds here. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:53 PDT |
G'day probo, honey Here's a few blatantly opportunistic comments, submitted for no other reason than to get you well and truly kick started into the 700s. After vinvixen2's experience with multiple commenting, however, I'll bundle them a bit. Hooroo. 1. A bicycle can't stand alone because it is two-tired. 2. What's the definition of a will? (It's a dead giveaway). 3. Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. 4. A backward poet writes inverse. 5. In democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism it's your count that votes |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:56 PDT |
6. She had a boyfriend with a wooden leg, but broke it off. 7. A chicken crossing the road is poultry in motion. 8. If you don't pay your exorcist you get repossessed. 9. With her marriage she got a new name and a dress. 10. Show me a piano falling down a mine shaft and I'll show you A-flat minor. (apologies for the higher than usual groan-factor of some of these e.g. #9) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:58 PDT |
11. When a clock is hungry it goes back four seconds. 12. The man who fell into an upholstery machine is now fully recovered. 13. A grenade thrown into a kitchen in France would result in Linoleum Blown apart. (Oh dear, they're getting worse) 14. You feel stuck with your debt if you can't budge it. 15. Local Area Network in Australia: the LAN down under. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:59 PDT |
16. He often broke into song because he couldn't find the key. 17. Every calendar's days are numbered. 18. A lot of money is tainted. 'Taint yours and 'taint mine. 19. A boiled egg in the morning is hard to beat. 20. He had a photographic memory which was never developed. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 17:01 PDT |
21. A plateau is a high form of flattery. 22. The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large. 23. Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end. 24. When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall. 25. Those who jump off a Paris bridge are in Seine. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 17:04 PDT |
26. When an actress saw her first strands of gray hair she thought she'd dye. 27. Bakers trade bread recipes on a knead to know basis. 28. Santa's helpers are subordinate Clauses. 29. Acupuncture is a jab well done. 30. Marathon runners with bad footwear suffer the agony of defeat. Okay. That's it. Dreadful weren't they. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Jul 2003 00:08 PDT |
Stressed Mum!
G'day!
(Not D'day, as I mis-keyed on an earlier occasion.)
Many thanks for your Comments which I rate as follows:
¤¤¤¤¤
No, they're not kisses ...
Please see 232965 for an explanation.
Kindest regards
PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: uzzz-ga on 20 Jul 2003 06:16 PDT |
. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 Jul 2003 12:31 PDT |
What a lame attempt (successful nevertheless) to get us back here. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 Jul 2003 12:32 PDT |
I must also note, that Omni deducted that the question cannot bear 1,000 comments, was wrong, and gor five stars AND a tip. Life is so unfair ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Jul 2003 23:01 PDT |
Hands up ... All those who thought that we'd never get as far as we have ... And hands up, all those who truly believed. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 23 Jul 2003 15:24 PDT |
713 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 23 Jul 2003 15:37 PDT |
Whodda thunk it? But will it stop at 1,000? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 23 Jul 2003 20:20 PDT |
715...just dropping by once more. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 23 Jul 2003 20:25 PDT |
p.s. sublime1, thanx for the explanation. makes sense.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 24 Jul 2003 21:50 PDT |
slowly but surely, we are making progress towards the 1,000 comment goal. But I think 1,000 commenTORS will be unlikely. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Jul 2003 11:10 PDT |
Attention, please! Please look at Question 234933 and you may see your name listed in The Roll of Honour (yes, that's how 'Honour' should be spelled). And, if not, why not? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 25 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
719... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 26 Jul 2003 16:23 PDT |
Oh, I was sure you'd make it. Am sure. People seem unable to resist silly little challenges that afford a sense of triumph without a great expenditure of effort. I think it's a way of thumbing one's nose at all the things we can't control in an out-of-control world, all the obstacles large and small that we just can't heave ourselves over, all the petty, divisive little rivalries and antagonisms that set us apart from one another in the workplace, in the supermarket checkout line, on the freeway, or wherever, that abrade our pleasure in kinship with our species and instead make us feel like alienated losers. Here's a chance to enjoy a sense of unity of purpose and ultimate victory, cheap, with some entertainment in the bargain. A sure-fire winner. I tried to help things along a time or two when they seemed to be lagging, but you're on the downhill side now and will probably coast to a finish. In fact, human nature being what it is, I wouldn't be surprised to see you log 1200 comments, 1500, 2000 . . . could this one grow unwieldy enough to crash the system? Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 26 Jul 2003 20:57 PDT |
not much to say; just dropping by to add #721.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 01:11 PDT |
This reminds me of school when I my teacher gave me lines for misbehaving or failing to complete my homework properly. On this occasion, prompted by probonopublico, I have 10 lines to submit asap................ I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 01:12 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:08 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (2) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:09 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (3) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:09 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (4) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:10 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (5) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:12 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (6) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:13 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (7) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:13 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (8) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:14 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (9) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:16 PDT |
I must chcek my answesr at least five timse before postign them. (10) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:17 PDT |
Oh D*!! I must check my answers at least six times before posting them. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:57 PDT |
734 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
735 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
736 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:59 PDT |
737 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 23:04 PDT |
738 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Jul 2003 04:20 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 You are a STAR! Many thanks. PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 29 Jul 2003 07:43 PDT |
As far as the original question, playing me in my life story would be Jim Carey and my leading lady would be: http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2003_05_08_index.html The Goddess of GA! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Jul 2003 09:06 PDT |
Hi, Bowler! Many thanks for the great link. It's the best ever. You are an absolute genius .... But how did you find it? (I bet you used a Search Engine, right?) PB |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 30 Jul 2003 00:34 PDT |
Gee, I found that a long time ago (yes, by a search on that very name, just out of curiosity) and read the whole set. Fascinating! Since the researchers obviously gave the interviews, I thought it must have been linked from GA pages somehow and I had just missed it. Well, now it is. Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: victoriac-ga on 30 Jul 2003 11:50 PDT |
Hi, Everyone I'm Victoria, PB's elder daughter. My Dad has asked me to support him, so here I am. Here's an idea ... Why doesn't everyone else ask their spouses, sons and daughters to join in? LOL Victoria |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:52 PDT |
Looks like 743 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:52 PDT |
Looks like 744 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 745 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 746 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 747 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like 748 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like 749 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like you've got 250 to go.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 31 Jul 2003 09:24 PDT |
Wow Smutzer ... Many thanks! You are an absolute gem. Hope you return to continue the good work. Regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 14:12 PDT |
bowler, thanx for the link. very entertaining. i only read pink's, but saved it to my faves folder so i can go back & read the rest, too. thanx again for sharing! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:10 PDT |
here are s'more ... until the Secret Police Force (GoogleBot) deems it necessary to CUT me OFF, that is! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:11 PDT |
754 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:12 PDT |
755 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:12 PDT |
756 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:13 PDT |
757 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:14 PDT |
758 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:14 PDT |
759 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:15 PDT |
TA-DA! here's 800!! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:17 PDT |
...just kidding! :-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:19 PDT |
ok, so it's REALLY #762... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:20 PDT |
763 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:20 PDT |
764 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:21 PDT |
765 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:22 PDT |
766 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 01 Aug 2003 19:44 PDT |
Very cute, but doesn't it seem logical that a comment has to *say* something? Otherwise it isn't really a comment, now, is it? Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 02 Aug 2003 02:07 PDT |
hmm, yeah, you are so right, apteryx! sooo, ya think someone oughta tell uzzz-ga about that??? (see comment #709) ;-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Aug 2003 03:39 PDT |
This morning, I came down to find Daisy sitting on a clutch of eggs. I think there's six but a large seagull is on patrol who barks at me whenever I try to get close. I have to assume that the seagull has been having an affair with Daisy, behind my back. Will they be edible? Valuable? Or merely gullible? Advice, please. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:13 PDT |
Depends. Is Daisy a cow? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:19 PDT |
Hi, Apteryx Many thnaks for your interest. Daisy is my 13-year-old Yorkshire terrier, so my query relates to Gull Terrier eggs. Regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:21 PDT |
Bryan... I think what you'll have there is a brood of gullible bird dogs... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 02 Aug 2003 23:52 PDT |
nothing in particular to add (as usual); just dropping by for #773 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:04 PDT |
Are we there yet? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trueparent-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:33 PDT |
You folks need to advertise that a Comment can be made after the expiration date of a question. I believe that most people do not know that. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trueparent-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:42 PDT |
Oh yes, I forgot; I think I would like Pee Wee Herman to represent me on screen....or maybe the Hulk.......I forget the names of the two/three actors, and the graphics folks. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:46 PDT |
Is Victoria really your daughter? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 01:13 PDT |
Hi, Everyone ... And, particularly, Jinx. Yes, Victoria really is my daughter. Surely, you don't think that an attractive young woman would pose as my daughter unless it were true? I also have another daughter, Samantha, but (as far as I know) she has yet to make any comments, unless (of course) she has without telling me. And then there's Daisy but she's too busy sitting on her eggs at the moment. Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 03 Aug 2003 03:58 PDT |
Confirmation: True, this line was added on 03 Aug 2003, between 03:57 and 58 PDT. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:26 PDT |
780 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:27 PDT |
I wonder how I got here: I was searching GA for something and found this question once again. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:31 PDT |
Now I found out which one it was that caught my attention. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:31 PDT |
By the way, despite what it seems, I am still looking for evidences. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 08:04 PDT |
Guten Tag, Tamar Does your cryptic remark imply that Victor Grayson is NOT dead? This is sensational. Please be VERY discreet when you post your answer ... Auf Wiedersehen Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 03 Aug 2003 11:39 PDT |
Hi, Bryan Probo-- I am acually less worried about your Daisy, who seems to be taking care of herself...uh...himself?? you didn't specify, but I am now wondering who laid the eggs...than I am about the line "having an affair with Daisy, behind my back." This suggests that Daisy's putative intimacy with a seagull would amount to an act of infidelity to you. I am concerned, Bryan. Is everything all right where you are? Apteryx |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 03 Aug 2003 11:59 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #786... and now it has happened. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 03 Aug 2003 12:49 PDT |
Hi, Probonopublico-ga Thank you for the following valuable contribution of yours: " Subject: Re: to guillermo-ga re. "I should have built a team for this one" From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 12:30 PDT Hi, Googel Sorry, I don't have anything to contribute but, as you have been kind enough to comment on my questions, I thought that I ought to reciprocate. Good Luck! Bryan " Regards |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 03 Aug 2003 15:26 PDT |
re: "This suggests that Daisy's putative intimacy with a seagull would amount to an act of infidelity to you. I am concerned, Bryan. Is everything all right where you are?" ooh, apteryx! omg-i am rolling right now! that is hilarious! thanx for the laffs, vinsvixen2 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 22:47 PDT |
Hi, Apteryx, Googel & Vinsvixen2 "Is there a Vinsvixen1?", I wonder. Thank you for your concern. It's a great shock when a pet owner discovers that his little dog has been doing what other dogs have been doing over the years. Naturally, I believe that Daisy could have done better for herself than choose a seagull as a partner but they seem happy enough together, so who am I to judge? There's nothing wrong with me now that a few cases of Dom Perignon won't fix but you will have to be very resourceful to get them to me. However, I have every confidence in you. Regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 00:32 PDT |
Hi, Probonopublico How much would you pay for an advice which would go like: "Include in your future questions the request 'Please consider part of this question the task of copying at least the beginning of your posted answer to this question into a comment or adding a brief new comment to my question at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=161982 ' " ? Cheers |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 04 Aug 2003 05:27 PDT |
G'day PB honey, Just had to drop by and see how you're going. Up to 790 now, I see. Well done! How's Daisy? Have those eggs hatched yet? Here's a pet story from downunder for you that's just happened and we're still shaking our heads in disbelief. One of my cats has just done something very nasty and extremely clever -- we aren't sure if we should be mad or proud ... stresseddad just went to get his shoes out of the wardrobe and smelled that yucky, unmistakable pong of cat wee.He checked the carpet and the walls and they were pristine. He couldn't understand where it was coming from until he picked up his shoes. Yep, dear Bruce (the cat's called Bruce)has manouvered his ample feline posterior and *sat* on the shoe and filled it copiously all without spilling a drop. Impressive, huh? See you in the 800s. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:11 PDT |
We still aren't there yet? This needs to be fixed! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:12 PDT |
When you reach your goal and go on a world tour to celebrate, I must insist that you let me take you here for dinner: http://www.tonypackos.com Perhaps they'll even ask you to sign a bun? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tutuzdad-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:22 PDT |
Maybe I should just post 207 more comments and declare a victory! tutuzdad-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: morris-ga on 04 Aug 2003 12:55 PDT |
In response to: hammer-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:53 PST While the cat's away, the mice will play. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Aug 2003 17:23 PDT |
I AM VERY GOOD AT SPOTTING OTHER PEOPLES MISTAKES ON THE OTHER HAND I, MYSELF, DON'T MAKE ANY. I AM PREFECT. REGARDS KEMLO. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Aug 2003 17:31 PDT |
Daisy is a silly bird He flits from bough to bough He lays his eggs in rubarb trees And whistles like a cow. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:48 PDT |
Wow, I go on a leetle teeny camping trip and y'all get almost all the way to 800! Good job! It's time for a...MUPPET CHEER!!! (Close your eyes, open your mouth wide, tilt your head toward the sky, wave your hands just over your head and scream) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:49 PDT |
Ready? 1... 2... 3... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:50 PDT |
Go!!! "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" (cool. 800.) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:12 PDT |
WOW ... It's another good news day! We've passed 800 Comments (Thanks to one and all) I've come into $4.5 million (Nigerian) And, best of all, it's NOT a Seagull that's been barking at me; it's a SWAN! 'Aw go on', I hear you say, 'A swan? ... So Daisy won't have any ugly gullthings, after all ...' I must admit that I thought she'd have more sense than go swanning around with a seagull; I feel much happier to know that she's been gulling around with a swan. Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:41 PDT |
Hi Probonopublico-ga, Please, where is the bug in: " Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:18 PDT Is it possible at all to apply ideas like: --after sucking out the air place the whole thing in heat room (with high pressure, perhaps) so that the plastic will lose its elasticity completely and take the foam's shape , then place it in a cool or cooler room (with high pressure again, perhaps) ? --after sucking out the air place the whole thing in heat room (with high pressure, perhaps) so that the plastic will lose its elasticity completely and take the foam's shape --while continuing the air sucking , then place it in a cool or cooler room (with high pressure, perhaps) ? " Regards |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:06 PDT |
Hi, Googel Many thanks for sharing your idea with me. I cannot find any bug in your proposition but, with these things, you never know until you try them out. Even so, the exercise could lead to a more elegant solution. But, in terms of the original question, would it be possible to do the tests within the cost and time parameters set out? Fortunately, I don't have the problem but I am sure that the Questioner has been given a few things to mull over. Regards Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:41 PDT |
Thank you for spending your time on my question, Probonopublico. May I copy your opinion above to question " finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag" ? Yours |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Aug 2003 00:12 PDT |
Hi, Again, Googel It's yours! And, again, many thanks for your support. Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:24 PDT |
thanks, Probonopublico. has been done. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:28 PDT |
... and beginning with: " Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:21 PDT Hi sven1791-ga, It would be very nice if you could address the questions raised by the opinion below re. my comment above. " Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:06 PDT ..." |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:42 PDT |
Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:41 PDT ... and heat could be applied like by vacuum forming machines?! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 05 Aug 2003 04:37 PDT |
I was last here on 14 June ... and we still haven't reached the magic figure of 1,000. C'mon Guys & Gals .... One last great big effort! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 05 Aug 2003 06:22 PDT |
Promises & Predictions
Who said ...
a) I will of course let you know the moment [when the number of
comments exceed those made on ID 50956] this happens .... ?
b) There is no chance of exceeding 200 comments ?
c) I have feeling that .... 1,000 comments is totally unachievable ? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 07:06 PDT |
Hi Probonopublico, It seems you have already achieved an additional prestigious world record: the most G-A nicknames posting comments to a Google-Answers question. I wonder who is the first one in the history of the Univers pointing to and naming this record ? ;) Thanks for the question. Cheers |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 11:34 PDT |
" Subject: Re: world record in nicknames at Probonopublico-ga's qstn ID 161982? From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 11:28 PDT ... the number of nicknames listed (90 or so) at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=234933 seem to be easily greater already than the number 107 minus the number of non-new nicknames at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 " |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 07 Aug 2003 11:29 PDT |
Still only 812? Must do smething about that ... But what? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: andrewxmp-ga on 07 Aug 2003 13:31 PDT |
"Who is pierce brosnan?" GAHHHHHH!!! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:05 PDT |
just dropping by to add one more... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:26 PDT |
ok, so i am JUST now getting into this "vaughn lowery" thing (the dancing joe boxer guy). not really "into" it, i guess; but just now finding out about all the hoopla over him, is what i mean. i almost never watch tv, so i had no idea he even existed until just a few days ago. i was reading thru the ga answered questions & someone asked who the guy was. since i'm a joe boxer girl (& always make sure my bookee has on his joe boxers, too!), i was interested. so, afta a few searches, i found out more than i'd've ever wanted to know about this guy. saw the commercials, the interactive game, his tv appearances; saw the fan sites, forums, chat boards, groups, etc.; etc. ... ETC! and now i must ask: WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL??! so, he dances around in his undies. yeah, okaaaay....AND??! am i just hopelessly not "with it" and just don't "get it"? i'll admit that, yes, i'm even an easily amused person; but i still just do NOT see this whole "vaughn" thing! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:28 PDT |
...hmm, not that vaughn lowery really has anything to do with this question. or anything else right now, for that matter. :-) just thot i'd throw it out there & see what everyone else had to say, tho. |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:37 PDT |
probonopublico-ga will be delighted --i guess-- to know that it wasn't a mistake, vinsvixen2-ga . |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:42 PDT |
hee hee! :-) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 16:29 PDT |
hi bryan, dunno if there's a "vinsvixen1" or not. but i know there's a "vinsvixen" meandering around out in cyberspace somewhere. and how do i know this, you may ask? cuz she stole that very name from me! & therefore i couldn't have it for my email addy, like i'd wanted! >:-( so, i chose to be vinsvixen, 'also' --> "vinsvixen, too". i've never run into vinsvixen directly, but i've seen some of her postings in the --where else?-- vin diesel community, where i tend to hang out waaaay too much! :-) (but puh-leeeze don't tell anyone about that last bit. cuz then i may hafta 'fess up to what i've named my plants and my car; how many times i've seen "pitch black"; & exactly how many t-shirts (& otha articles of clothing) i have with his picture on it!) [and this from a 30-year-old, no less!] |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Aug 2003 22:55 PDT |
Hi, Everyone! Many thanks for all your comments. Nice to see Stressed Mum around and how about that Vinsvixen2 ???? Only wish I knew what she's called her car and her plants ... Keep 'em coming! Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: academy589-ga on 08 Aug 2003 06:45 PDT |
Intriguing |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: academy589-ga on 08 Aug 2003 06:46 PDT |
#823 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:23 PDT |
http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/ |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:28 PDT |
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:35 PDT |
Hi, Again, Bowler You continue to amaze me ... But will your recent Comments survive the Bot Test? Kindest regards Bryan (PS I don't think that you are French .... Rght?) |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 09:59 PDT |
PB, No, I'm not French although not many people will admit they are French in the U.S. nowadays. I'm not familiar with the bot test. Is it multiple choice? Thanks again! Bowler-ga |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 10:10 PDT |
Hi, Again, Bowler The G Bot is a secret censoring service and I feel sure that it will not like: http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/ Lese majeste, no less. As regards: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html C'est plus de Lese Majeste or (more correctly) Lese Napoleon. Oh! la! la! |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 14:38 PDT |
just popping in to add #829 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:31 PDT |
googel, ok, i admit: i am too lazy to search back thru GA & find the answer on my own, sooo: what is up with you and this flosser gadget?? i keep seeing all these questions; and some are even being closed before they can be answered??? so, hey, what gives? what's the deal? jus' curious, is all.... |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:33 PDT |
hmm, well, since i'm here: ...831 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:34 PDT |
832 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:38 PDT |
833 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:40 PDT |
834 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:43 PDT |
835 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:45 PDT |
836 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:49 PDT |
837 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:03 PDT |
838 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:04 PDT |
839 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:05 PDT |
840 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:06 PDT |
841 |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 22:13 PDT |
Hi, Again, Vinsvixen2 You really are a star ... I only wish I knew what you've called your car and your plants ... Keep 'em coming! Bryan |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 08 Aug 2003 22:57 PDT |
vinsvixen2-ga , great to know you follow the events here. have you seen the gadget already? |
| Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 08 Aug 2003 23:01 PDT |