|
|
Subject:
Spousal Privilege with respect to private or corporate non-disclosure agreements
Category: Relationships and Society > Law Asked by: grammatoncleric-ga List Price: $9.50 |
Posted:
16 Jan 2004 14:13 PST
Expires: 19 Jan 2004 11:26 PST Question ID: 297239 |
If I sign a non-disclosure agreement with a company, third-party, employer, etc. am I legally allowed to disclose to my wife anything confidential between me and the third-party? Barring a discussion of whether this is ethical or not, is it legal? Furthermore, I know that spousal privilege prevents my wife from being coerced to disclose anything I have told her in private, so the issue may be a moot point, but I wanted to know about it's legality. Does disclosing confidential information to my wife technically break an NDA? A couple of caveats: 1. I, of all people, understand that Google Answers cannot be held liable for legal advice, so consider your answer already disclaimed. 2. This has nothing to do with a current or historical situation; I am merely theoretically curious and don't have the patience to peruse the web to find out. |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Spousal Privilege with respect to private or corporate non-disclosure agreem
From: juggler-ga on 17 Jan 2004 15:37 PST |
Hello Grammatoncleric, Here's an article on the subject: "Do You Talk Too Much?" IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine #3, pg. 74 (September 1991) http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/IEEE/ieee05.htm From: "Scientific Misconduct and Research Fraud" by Charles Walter, Ph.D., J.D. and Edward P. Richards III, J.D., M.P.H. http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/IEEE/p2.htm Note that the case discussed in "Do You Talk Too Much?" is fictitious. However, the basic point is sound, at least theoretically. Disclosing your employer's trade secrets to your wife could indeed violate your NDA. Confidential means confidential. |
Subject:
Re: Spousal Privilege with respect to private or corporate non-disclosure agreements
From: grammatoncleric-ga on 19 Jan 2004 11:14 PST |
Juggler, Thank you for your comment. I find your reference, although sound, to be problematic, because the ficitious story plots the husband telling his wife the trade secrets in a public setting. Naturally, this could also void the interspousal privilege (the lack of wisdom from talking in a public place aside). -grammatoncleric |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |