Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Tort Lawsuits ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   2 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Tort Lawsuits
Category: Reference, Education and News > General Reference
Asked by: wordwarp-ga
List Price: $135.00
Posted: 03 Feb 2004 13:21 PST
Expires: 04 Mar 2004 13:21 PST
Question ID: 303244
I need to find out the actual case names of lawsuits discussed at the
www.overlawyered.com website (and also a few discussed at the "Stupid
Lawsuit Collection" website, www.power-of-attorneys.com/
stupid_lawsuit_collection.asp?wacky=0 - 28k).

There are 27 lawsuits for which I need the case name.  I am willing to
pay $5 per case name, if you are unable to find out the case names of
every one of the 27 cases listed below.

Here is an example of the format I need for each case name:

(Stuff v. Kmart Corp., Cal., Los Angeles Country Super. Ct., No. EC
028718, Jan. 18, 2001)

If you cannot get this level of detail, I would be willing to pay $4
per case just for the case name and state it was filed in (e.g. Stuff
v. Kmart Corp., CA)

The cases follow.  Please advise on your progress as you go along.  My
suspicion is that you will be able to find most of these through
Lexis/Nexis, which I don't have access to.

best regards and thanks in advance.

Bill Biggar





CASE #1
Overlawyered.com, Dec., 1999, II
Auto/PTSD
Case name?

Andrea Karlson was hit by George B. Daniels in a low speed auto accident.

The accident was so minor that neither party needed an ambulance nor a tow-truck.

Karlson?s lawyer argued that the accident had caused post-traumatic
stress disorder by bringing back memories of childhood abuse, and that
the condition was so bad that she was unable to continue her work as a
flight attendent.

Jury: $523,000

?Car accident brings back bad memories: $523,000?


CASE #2

Overlawyered.com, Oct. ?03
Govt. Negligence
Case name?
An 11 year old girl fell out of a New Orleans streetcar?s window.  Her
arm was crushed when she fell out.
The city said that the girl?s mother should have been monitoring her
behavior more closely.

Jury: $51.4 million dollars to girl.

Jury celebrated by taking picture with the judge and the girl?s
lawyer, Johnnie Cochran, on the steps of the courthouse.

?Fell out streetcar window: $51.4 million?


CASE #3
Overlawyered.com, Oct. ?03
In Los Angeles, Dr. Angelo Grouse, a black doctor visiting the city
was driving a   car which unbeknownst to him, had been erroneously
reported stolen.  Police pulled the car over, and handcuffed and
arrested Dr. Grouse.   They also refused to look at the rental papers
in the cars glove box when Dr. Grouse professed his innocence.
Dr. Grouse spent two hours in jail before the error was found.

Jury: $33 million ($18.8 million from Budget Rent a Car; $15.5 million
from City of Los Angeles).

?Arrested for DWB: $33 million?



CASE #4
Overlawyered.com, Oct. ?03
Products Liability

In 1992,  the baby of Shelly Moore, of Texas, burned to death in fire
in her mother?s car.

The mother claimed that the fire must have started by a cigarette she
thought was extinguished, though she did testify that she used a
disposable lighter that occasionally would keep burning once used, to
the point that she would have to blow it out to extinguish the flame,
and that she had toss the lighter onto the seat of the car shortly
before the fire in the car started.

Phillip Morris settled the case for $2 million dollars, the first time
it has ever settled a product liability case over the fact that their
cigarettes keep burning even when not being smoked.

?Cigarette starts fire: $2 million?


CASE #5
Overlawyered.com, September ?03
ADA
Woman in wheelchair sues San Francisco theater when she is forced to
use the men?s room, and even that cubicle would not latch fully with
the wheelchair inside.

Settle: $150,000
In an El Torito restaurant, where the customers? bathroom were on the
second floor (and they had a policy against letting customers use the
employees bathroom on the first floor), a wheelchair-bound customer
was eventually forced to urinate in the restaurant?s parking lot,
surrounded by cars? headlights.
Jury: $80,000

?No handicapped bathroom: $150,000?

 
CASE #6
From ?Stupid Lawsuit Collection?
Workplace Safety
Look up case

Cheryl Vanevender sued the convenience store she worked at after
injuring her back opening up a giant pickle jar.

Jury: $2.2 million

?Hurt back opening big pickle jar: $3 million?



CASE #7
Overlawyered.com, July ?02, III
CR ? sex discrimination/harassment
Case name?

Six female Ralph?s supermarket employees brought suit accusing their
manager, over a decade of time, of calling them ?vulgar names,?
?manhandling them,? and throwing items like phones, clipboards, and
heavy mailbags at them.

Jury: 6 x $5 million = $30 million; reduced by judge to $8 million.

?Called vulgar names and stuff thrown at them: $8 million?


CASE #8
Overlawyered.com, July ?02, III
CR ? race
Govt. Liability (School)
Case name?

Vincent Peries, a Sri Lankan teacher in the NY public schools, was
harassed by his Special Education students, who made fun of his accent
and ethnicity.

Students were deemed to have created a hostile work environment.

Settled: $50,000

?Teacher made fun of by students: $50,000?





CASE #9
Overlawyered.com, June ?02, II
Negligence
Case name?

A woman lied down on the tracks in a tunnel of New York?s subway
system.  She was subsequently hit by the E-Train, and her face and
hands badly injured.  She denied that she was trying to commit
suicide, saying she ?couldn?t remember? why she had lied down on the
tracks.

Six minutes before the accident, a 911 call came in from someone who
had seen her on the tracks.  Subway officials were able to contact the
driver, who slowed down to between 10 and 15mph.   In such a case,
less than 10mph is the policy.  Plaintiff contended he would have been
able to stop in time if he had slowed down to the lower speed.

Jury: $14.1 million; reduced to $9.9 million because the judge found
the woman to be 30% responsible for the accident.

?Hit by subway car: $9.9 million?


CASE #10
Overlawyered.com, April, 2002, III
Toxic Torts ? mold.
Case name?

TV personality Ed McMahon sued (who) after toxic mold growing in his
house ruined the house and killed his pet dog.

Confidential settlement amount, but reported to be $7 million by a
national mold litigation magazine (a national litigation mold
magazine?).

?Toxic mold in house: $7 million?


CASE #11
Overlawyered.com, Feb, 2002, I
Fraud
Case name?

Two women who said they were deceived by leaders of a fundamentalist
church called, ?The True and Living Church of Jesus Christ of the
Saints of the Last Days? because the Church had promised to produce
Jesus Christ in the flesh, in exchange for substantial contributions
from the ladies ? namely, property and water rights.

When the Lord failed to appear, they sued.

Jury: $270,000 to Kaziah  Hancok (spelling?) and $20,000 to Cindy Stewart.

?Church promises Jesus will appear: $290,000?


CASE #12
Overlawyered.com, Jan, 2002, III
Premises ? slip and fall
Hernandez v. J.C. Penney

Hernandez, a shopper in California at a day after Christmas sale,
slipped and fell on hangars, clothes, and other debris on the ground
at the hectic J.C. Penney store.  She hurt her knee, ankle, and lumbar
region of her spine.

Both the store?s Department Manager and Assistant Manager had been on
break at the time, and all of the other sales people were busy
assisting other customers, so the jury found that the store had
provided inadequate supervision.

Settled: $349,999

?Slipped and fell while shopping: $349,999?


CASE #13
Overlawyered.com, Dec, 2001, II
Premises ? workman?s comp
Case?

Nathan Lett, a deliveryman for Aramark Corp. in Illinois, was attacked
by Canadian Geese on his employer?s property.

He filed a workman?s compensation claim because he had broken his
wrist while defending himself from the birds.

He asserted that the company had ?a duty to warn workers because the
building was in an area that attracked geese.?

Panel awarded him: $17,000

?Attacked by geese: $17,000?


CASE #14
Overlawyered.com, Nov, 2001, I
CR ? reverse harassment suit/Right to Privacy
Case name?

A male employee was accused of rape by a co-worker at their company, Rohm & Haas.

The company immediately investigated the claim, per their sex
harassment policy, subjecting the male to a ?police style
interrogation.?

The male argued that the company invaded his privacy and embarrassed
him with the investigation and said that investigating a charge of
rape was really a matter for the police to investigate, not the
company.

Jury: $150,000 to male.
Jury: Also found his accuser to be guilty of defamation of his
character, but decline to order her to pay him any money.

?Falsely accused of rape: $150,000?



CASE #15
Overlawyered.com, Aug., 2000,I
CR ? race
Class Action
Case name?

Twenty-one African-American employees sued Interstate Bakeries, the
makers of ?Wonder Bread,? charging that the company maintained a
hostile work environment in which racial slurs were tolerated and
African-Americans were seldom promoted.

One man testified that he had not been allowed to take off Martin
Luther King Day, even though causasian workers where given time off to
watch a San Francisco Giants baseball game.

Jury: $11 million in compensatory damages and also $121 million in
punitive damages, the latter of which was reduced by the judge to $24
million.

That?ll buy some baseball tickets!

?Racial slurs by supervisors: $35 million?


CASE #16
Overlawyered.com, Aug., 2000, III
Negligence/School
Nieuwendorp v. American Family Insurance Co.

In 1995, the Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a jury verdict against the
parents of a child who attacked his teacher at school.  The child had
been diagnosed with Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity-Disorder, and had
been prescribed Ritalin, but the parents had taken the child off the
medicine.

The child, a 4th grade special education student, subsequently
attacked the teacher, pulling her hair, as a result of which she fell
to the ground and hurt her back.

The jury decided the parents were at fault not because they had taken
the child off of the medication, but because they had failed to warn
the school that they had done do.

Jury: $170,000 to teacher

?Teacher attacked by 4th grader: $170,000?


CASE #17
Overlawyered.com, Oct., 2000, III
Consumer Fraud/Products Liability
Case name?

A Texas couple who bought a Dodge Ram pick-up truck for use in their
horse-transportation business sued Chrysler and their dealership,
claiming that they were misled as to the truck?s towing capacity.

The couple did not suffer any physical injury, but the vehicle was not
strong enough to pull their horse trailers.  As a result, they ended
up losing their horse-transportation business, and the husband
suffered depression.

Jury awarded them $83.5 million, of which $82.5 million were punitive damages.

Follow up?  See Margaret Cronin Fisk, ?Jury Tags Chrysler for $83
million? in Nat?l Law Journal.

?Defrauded by car dealer and car maker: $83.5 million?


CASE #18        
Overlawyered.com, July, 2000, III
Retaliation
Case name?

Vanessa Steele Inman, a stripper, sued the Miss Nude World
International pageant and the Pink Pony Strip Club in Atlanta.

She maintained that rigged balloting had favored another contestant,
and that she was blackballed at clubs throughout the country in
retaliation for refusing to do lap dances, be auctioned off to
golfers, or allow her breasts to be covered with whipped cream for a
whipped cream eating contest.

Jury: $2.4  million, of which $835,000  was compensatory and $1.6
million was punitive.

?Stripper blackballed by strip clubs: $2.4 million?


CASE #19
Overlawyered.com, June, 2000, I
CR - Sex
Case name? 

A group of female members of Haverhill Golf and Country Club in Boston
sued their club, alleging that the club?s policy did not allow them to
tee-off at the most desirable times, for example on Saturday and
Sunday mornings.

Jury: $1.9 million to the women, and sensitivity training for the club.

?Female golfers given bad tee-off times: $1.9 million?



CASE #20
Overlawyered.com, May, 2000, II
Alienation of Affections
Case name?

Candi Vessel, of Utah, sued her cheating husband?s girlfriend, for
?alienation of affections.?

Jury: Husband?s new girlfriend must pay the wife $500,000.

?Wife sues cheating husband?s girlfriend: $500,000?


CASE #21
Overlawyered.com, May, 2000, II
CR ? sex
Case name?

Peter Corradino, a waiter at TGIFridays, complained of female
employees touching him and grabbing for his private parts.   When he
protested their actions, male employees called him names like ?fag?
and ?queer.?  He complained to management, and brought suit for sexual
harassment.

Jury: $125,000

?Man sexually harassed by female co-workers: $125,000?



CASE #22
Overlawyered.com, May, 2000, III
Negligence?
Case name?

Linda K. Powers, 41, a dental hygienist from Atlanta, sued her dance
partner, Mike D. Lastufka.

The two were dancing when her partner tried a ?shag-style spin move?
and broke her thumb in the process.

Jury: $220,000 for the broken thumb.

?Thumb broken by dance partner: $220,000?





CASE #23
Overlawyered.com, March, 2000, I
Fraud
Case name?

Barbara Carlisle and her parents, George and Velma Merriwether, bought
two satellite dishes for a cost of $1100 dollars each in 1995.

They contend that the company, Gulf Coast Electronics, tried to gouge
them out of $1200 by using a tricky financing scheme created by
Whirlpool Financial National Bank.

Gulf Coast Electronics settled for an undisclosed amount during the trial.

Jury ordered Whirlpool to pay the family $581 million, the punitive
portion of which the judge reduced to a mere $300 million.

?Ripped off by satellite TV salesman: $300 million?

  

CASE #24
Overlawyered.com, Feb., 2000, I
CR ? excessive force/Dog bite
Case name?

Mindro Donchev, an escaped murderer from Bulgaria, lived for over ten
years in the Cascade Mountains of Washington State, surviving by
breaking into vacant vacation cabins.

In 1998, during an arrest for burglary of one of the cabins, he was
confronted by police, and, armed with ?knives, handguns, and a pointed
stick,? resisted arrest.

In the struggle to arrest him, a police dog mangled his foot, leading
to the eventual loss of two of his toes.  He sued for the use of
excessive force.

Jury: $412,500 for the burglar?s loss of two toes.

?Mauled by police dog: $413,500?




CASE #25
Overlawyered.com, Jan, 2000, II
CR ? race/Retaliation
Case name?

Eunice Lafate sued her employer, Chase Manhattan Bank, contending
she?d been passed over for promotion because of her race.

She lost the case.

But then she brought a second suit, alleging that subsequent to the
first lawsuit, she had been cut out of management meetings and given
bad evaluations in retaliation for having sued.

Jury: $600,000

?Retaliated against for bringing suit against company: $600,000?


CASE #26
Overlawyered.com, April, 2000, I
Products Liability
Faryniarz v. Nike

Ms. Faryniarz, an orthopedic surgeon, trip and fell while jogging in
Nike shoes.  She asserted that the shoes? shoelaces were ?too long?
and that they caught in a pull tab on the back of the opposite shoe
which was ?too rigid,? and thus caused her fall, during which she
sustained injuries to her hands and wrists that interfered with her
doing her job as an orthopedic surgeon.

She sued for $10 million dollars on each of three counts of product liability.

Outcome?


?Fell because shoelaces were too long: $10 million?





CASE #27
Overlawyered.com, November ?03
Govt. Negligence
NO NAME OF PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT GIVEN.  Need to have these and others looked up.
Somali refugee badly beaten up by foster kids  living in a foster home
in West Seattle.
State was shown to be negligent because state social workers did not
put the kids who assaulted the refugee in a ?more restrictive?
environment.  (One possible reason for this was because state laws
require foster kids to be put in ?the least restrictive, most
family-like?setting possible.)

Jury: $8.8 million from State of Washington; $300,000 ffrom Shell Oil
because the beating took place at a gas station franchised by the
company.

Note: see also, Sept. 13-14

?Beaten up by foster kids.  State pays $8.8 million?

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 15:06 PST
These aren't urban legend cases.  I have corresponded with Walter
Olson, the author of overlawyered.com (and the author of "The
Litigation Explosion.")  These are real cases.

Do you have access to Lexis/Nexis?  County/State records databases?

thanks

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 15:16 PST
for example, this google search clearly yields a real case.

://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=johnnie+cochran+streetcar+lawsuit

Same with this one, in reference to Case 13:

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:6_0OMDix200J:www.kfshort.com/resume/01/images/1011MBOA.pdf+nathan+lett+aramark&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Additionally, Cases 3,4, 7, 15, and 17 all got extensive national
press throughout their trials.

I just need the legal names of the pleadings.

Please pass this question along to someone with a background in legal research.

thanks

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 15:38 PST
here are a couple of more links for the next researcher.  These are
for Case #27, again clearly a real, not an urban legend, case.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/148769_foster18.html

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/158349_fosterhome28.html

here's the original search:

://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=king+county+jury+%248.8+million&btnG=Google+Search

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 16:01 PST
here's a link verifying the veracity of Case #1:

http://www.yourct.com/news/654/

Request for Question Clarification by tutuzdad-ga on 03 Feb 2004 17:28 PST
In spite of how it appears (that your list is a bunch of urban
legends) I've actually found about half of the case titles thus far. I
expect to have them soon, but probably not a handful of them. Having
said that, how do you plan to compensate per question answered if my
answer does not total the $135 you currently have on your price? Once
I post my answer the question will be closed and you cannnot reduce it
to meet the "per answered question" offer you established.

Regards;
tutuzdad-ga

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 17:40 PST
hi, thanks.

As I said above, I'll pay $5 per case if you can't find all of them. 
Actually, I noticed that one of the overlawyered.com cases already has
the case name on it (Case #16, Nieuwendorp v. American Family
Insurance Co.), but I'll throw that in as a freebie anyway and pay the
full $135 on the 27.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

thanks : )

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 17:47 PST
Wait, I just reread your request for clarification.  I'm sorry this is
my first time using this service, and I'm getting slammed on something
completely different at the moment.

Are you saying that the question will be closed, and I have to pay the
full $135 even if you are able to find only 13 or 14 case names?  This
does not seem right, given that I outlined the terms ($5 per case)
before you accepted it.  Or am I missing something here?

thanks.

Request for Question Clarification by tutuzdad-ga on 03 Feb 2004 20:37 PST
To play it safe, kust to make sure you feel comformtable, why don't
you reduce your price to, say, $75 (I know I have that many so far and
still plunking along) and you can make up the difference using the TIP
feature when after I post my answer?

How's that method sound?
tutuzdad-ga

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 20:59 PST
That's fine.  I will have to explore how to do that, but that's okay.

Also, I will probably have many more of these coming up.

best,

ww

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 21:06 PST
Huh.  The FAQ says, "You can ask any question that can be answered
with words or numbers. And you can edit your question's parameters at
any time as long as it is not 'locked.' That is, as long as it is not
being worked on by a Researcher, you can change the question's price
or its category."

But my question is listed as, " You cannot modify or comment on this
question right now. It is currently being answered." --becuase you are
currently working on it.

If you feel confident that you will be able to get the rest of the
case names, I'm not in a huge rush -- a couple of days will be fine. 
Also, I will have many more of these coming (writing a book), so this
could turn into steady work for the next couple of weeks.

thanks

Request for Question Clarification by tutuzdad-ga on 03 Feb 2004 21:28 PST
I have found 22 of the 27 you mentioned (case #11 and #15 had two
cases each). If you'd like to open a new question for the appropriate
amount AND REQUEST TUTUZDAD specifically in your subject line, we can
do it that way if it's easier. Then I will release this question and
you can cancel it if you wish.

In your upcoming posts maybe you can ask about the ones I didn't find
and someone else might be able to work them.

tutuzdad-ga

Clarification of Question by wordwarp-ga on 03 Feb 2004 21:40 PST
22/27 is great and fine for this round.  Please advise as to whether
the other five are just ungettable, or whether I should just include
them in the next batch.

Please submit your answer for payment.  Will review -- though I'm not
sure how I would/will verify them.  Would it be disclosing trade-craft
to tell me how you found them?  Simple Lexis search?  If so, do you
think this is a fair price I have offered?  Approximately how long do
they take?

Thank you,

ww

Request for Question Clarification by tutuzdad-ga on 04 Feb 2004 04:35 PST
Good morning. I'm back on the "case" bright and early. I'll provide
you with my answer shortly. Please allow a bit of time for formatting.

Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
Answer  
Subject: Re: Tort Lawsuits
Answered By: tutuzdad-ga on 04 Feb 2004 07:01 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Dear wordwarp-ga;

Thank you for allowing me an opportunity to answer your interesting
question. The cases you cited are, for the most part, actual cases and
not urban legends as earlier surmised. This not only lends to their
entertainment value but it also makes them confirmable through other
sources. You may find in some instances the facts were a bit amiss or
the awards might have been eventually reduced, lessening the impact of
the cases in terms of how outrageous they were in reality. In at least
one instance, the award was largely symbolic as local law actually
limited the extreme punitive award to a certain percentage of the
actual damages. Below I have listed those that I was able to find (22
cases of the 27 cases you mentioned - please note: cases #11 and #15
had two cases each. Case #5 also had two cases but I could only locate
one of them.). In every instance I found the legal title of the case
mentioned in an article on the internet (nothing tricky about that)
and did not use a legal database such as Lexis Nexis, but you may find
that useful in locating the ones I was unable to find:


CASE #1

This was a tough one and I didn?t have any luck with it. This one can
probably be found by searching a legal database or local court
records.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #2

This one proved to be elusive also though I did find credible
references to it. The plaintiff?s name is SHANNON SCHWEITZER:

?GIRL WINS $51 MILLION IN STREETCAR CASE?
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/index.ssf?/base/news-1/106214019743080.xml

I?m confident that this case can eventually be found in some database,
local court record, or newspaper due to the notoriety of the attorney.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #3

(The plaintiff?s name was misspelled in your question. The correct
spelling of his last name is ?GOUSSE? and he was a Haitian immigrant
surgeon visiting Los Angeles for a medical conference)

Gousse v. City of Los Angeles, Case No. BC 252804.

SOURCE: BUSINESS WIRE
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0EIN/2003_Oct_22/109141633/p1/article.jhtml

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #4

SHANNA SHIPMAN AS NEXT FRIEND OF   
SHANNON MOORE, A MINOR

VS.

PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC.;
PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED;
PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A.; and
SHELLY MOORE                       

SOURCE: UNTITLED
http://www.waltman.com/PhilipMorris/pleading.txt

SMOKEFREE.NET
http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/246977.html

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #5 & 5A

No luck with the first one though I?m confident that this case can
also be found using the right database. I did however find the second
one:

HANKINS v EL TORITO (Employee Rest Room) 63 CA4 510 [See: 42 USC 12181
etseq; CivC 51, 52, 54 etseq; Donald v Cafe Royale 218 CA3 168]

SOURCE: HANKINS v EL TORITO
http://www.advance-tapes.com/at1998/1998/06/ats1981.html

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #6

This one was tough but once I got the name right I found it easily.
The plaintiff?s name was misspelled in your question. The correct
spelling is ?CHERYL VANDEVENDER?:

No. 23463 - Cheryl L. Vandevender, Plaintiff Below, Appellee v.
Sheetz, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant Below, Appellant
and Karen Foltz, Defendant Below, Appellee

SOURCE: UNTITLED
http://www.state.wv.us/wvsca/docs%5Cspring97%5C23463d.htm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #7

Gober et al. v. Ralph's Grocery Inc., No. N72142, remittitur ordered
(Cal. Super. Ct., San Diego County, 7/15/2002)

SOURCE: EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION REPORTER
http://www.andrewspub.com/rptr_desc.asp?pub=EMP

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #8

Peries v. New York City Board of Education, 2001 WL 1328921 (E.D.N.Y. 2001).

SOURCE: SLADE & ASSOCIATES
http://www.sladelaw.com/cases.htm
(2/3 the way down the page)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #9

I found many reliable references to this but no actual case name. The
plaintiff?s name was SEONG SIL KIM so presumably this was ?Kim v City
of New York? or perhaps ?Seong v City of New York?. I?ll let you
decide if this suffices:

SACRAMENTO BEE
http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/opinions/story/732014p-5341436c.html

NEW YORKERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE REFORM
http://www.nycjr.org/art2.html

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE#10

McMahon v. American Equity Insurance Co., et al., No. BC271423 (Calif.
Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.)

SOURCE: THE IEQ REVIEW
http://www.imakenews.com/pureaircontrols/e_article000154071.cfm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #11 & #11A

IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF SAN PETE, STATE OF UTAH

KAZIAH MAY HANCOCK,
and, CINDY SUE STEWERT
Plaintiff

vs

JAMES D. HARMSTON,
THE TRUE AND LIVING CHURCH
OF JESUS CHRIST OF SAINTS
OF THE LAST DAYS, ET. AL.

SOURCE: LAW SUIT AGAINST JAMES D. HARMSTON AND THE TRUE AND LIVING
CHURCH OF CHRIST (TLC)
http://polygamybooks.com/lawtlc.htm

Hancock v. True & Living Church of Jesus Christ of the Saints of the
Last Days, Utah, Sanpete County Dist. Ct.: 84

SOURCE: PN INDEX
http://216.109.117.135/search/cache?p=%22Hancock+V%22+%22LIVING+CHURCH%22&ei=UTF-8&n=20&fl=0&url=wv-igmk0ft8J:www.atla.org/subs/PNLRindex02.pdf


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #12

Hernandez v. J.C. Penney Co. Inc., No. VC 030 725 (L.A. County)

SOURCE: OVERLAYERED.COM
http://overlawyered.com/archives/02/jan3.html

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #13

The plaintiff?s name was misspelled in your question. The correct
spelling is ?NOLAN LETT?. I found many references to the case but no
direct case information.

I don?t believe you?ll find this one, I suspect that it may not have
been a trial, but rather an Illinois Workers Compensation hearing:

??an Illinois panel has approved a $17,000 settlement??
http://overlawyered.com/archives/01/dec2.html

VITELL & SPITZ
http://www.vitellspitzlaw.com/resources.asp

ANANOVA - MAN WINS COMPENSATION AFTER GOOSE CHASE AT WORK
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_414481.html?menu=

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE#14

I found no case number but I did find a simple reference to the case:

Mark Jackson v. Rohm & Haas

SOURCE: RHOADES & SINON
http://www.rhoads-sinon.com/newsandevents/archives/legalupdates/shill08.htm

2003 PREMESIS LIABILITY
http://www.premises-liability.net/pl_cases.html


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #15 & #15A

Carroll, et al. v. Interstate Brands Corp., et al. (Case No.:995728) and 
Bryant, et al. v. Interstate Brands Corp., et al. (Case No.:304142)

SOURCE: JURY FINDS FOR "WONDER BREAD" PLAINTIFFS; ALIOTO SAYS VERDICT
WILL HELP PREVENT JOB DISCRIMINATION
http://www.angelaalioto.com/pr/PR073100.html

WORKERS WIN BIG IN BIAS SUIT; WONDER BREAD TO APPEAL
(and also)
INTERSTATE BAKERIES DOESN'T GET STAY OF PUNITIVE-DAMAGES AWARD
http://www.digitalcity.com/houston/national_hotissue/main.adp?page=wonder

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #16

Nieuwendorp v. American Family Insurance Co., 529 NW.2d 594 (Wisc. 1995).

SOURCE: QUARTERLY REPORT JULY-SEPTEMBER, 1997
http://ideanet.doe.state.in.us/legal/pdf/quarterly_reports/1997_julsep.pdf

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #17

Sellers v. Chrysler Corp. No. 296-1283-98 (Dist. Ct., Collins Co., Texas).

(The story sounds good for the purposes it serves, but the whole story
wasn?t told. The award against Chrysler was actually reduced from $80
million to $1.4 million due to a Texas cap law in effect that limits
awards to three times the actual economic damages, but the dealer was
ordered to pay $2.5 million)

SOURCE: JURY TAGS CHRYSLER FOR $83 MILLION
http://www.law.com/jsp/statearchive.jsp?type=Article&oldid=ZZZ6J9KIXDC

Express New Car Warranties Under State Law
http://www.bigclassaction.com/dear_lawyer/vol1no14.html
(Near the end of the article)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #18

Date: 9/27/00
Case Style: Vanessa Steele Inman v. Jack Galardi, et. al.
Case Number: E-65732
Judge: L.A. McConnell
Court: Superior Court, Fulton County, Georgia

SOURCE: STEELE v GILARDI
http://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=E%2D65732&s=GA%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&d=11293

CASE CITATION:  LEARNING TO BE A LAWYER
http://www.gabar.org/pdf/gbj/feb01.pdf

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #19

Docket No.:  01-P-1705 
Parties:  JUDITH BORNE & others(1) vs. HAVERHILL GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB,
INC. (and a companion case(2)).
County: Suffolk.  
Dates:  December 19, 2002. - June 13, 2003. 
Present:  Greenberg, Kass, & Cohen, JJ.  
Anti-Discrimination Law, Sex, Prima facie case, Burden of proof,
Damages, Attorney's fees. Constitutional Law, Sex discrimination.
Practice, Civil, Instructions to jury, Directed verdict. Evidence,
State of mind, Emotional state. Damages, Remittitur, Punitive,
Attorney's fees. Injunction. Contempt.

SOURCE: UNTITLED: http://www.socialaw.com/appslip/appJune03g.html

THE OFFICE OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
APPEALS COURT ARGUMENT SET FOR TOMORROW IN HAVERHILL COUNTRY CLUB SEX
DISCRIMINATION CASE
http://www.ago.state.ma.us/txt/haverhillcc.htm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #20

I found some unconfirmed references to the case but no case
information. The facts in this case are too unclear to research. You
may have trouble finding this one until you know more exact details
regarding the parties? names:

THE SUN
http://www.thesunlink.com/news/2000/february/0211say.html
(Here the plaintiff is called CANDACE WAGNER)

ALIENATION OF AFFECTION' LAWSUITS A BACKWARD RELIC 
http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2000/000008.html
(Here the plaintiff is called CANDIE VESSEL)

LIST ARCHIVES
http://listarchives.his.com/smartmarriages/smartmarriages.0005/msg00010.html
(Here the plaintiff is called CANDI VESSEL)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #21

I found some unconfirmed references to the case but no case
information. This case can probably be located in a legal database,
local court records or newspaper.


http://www.8bm.com/diatribes/volume01/diatribes038/diatribes764-784/diatribes774.htm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE# 22

I found unconfirmed references to the case but no case information.
This case can probably be located also in the right a legal database,
local court records or newspaper.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #23

In this instance the parent?s names were misspelled in your question.
The correct spelling of their last name should be ?Merriweather?,
however this did not have a great deal of impact on the title of the
case. (This is just an FYI for the sake of accuracy):

Carlisle v. Whirlpool Fin. Nat?l. Bank, No. 97-068 (Circuit Court of
Hale County, Alabama)

SOURCE: CASE CITATION
http://home.olemiss.edu/~llibcoll/ndms/may2000/00D0070P.rtf

CJ ONLINE
http://cjonline.com/stories/051199/new_jackpot.shtml

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE #24

Again, the plaintiff?s name was misspelled in your question, which
threw me off for a while. The correct spelling is ?Mincho Donchev?.
However, I was able to locate it eventually:

Case Number C98-1199 
Short Case Title Mincho Donchev v. Rick Bart, et al. 
Judge Assigned TSZ 
Nature of Suit 550 - Prisoner - Civil Rights 
Division Seattle 
Date Filed 08/27/98

SOURCE: UNTITLED
http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/wawd/98caselst.nsf/0/b805d50f859e715b8825666d0083396a?OpenDocument

REASON MAGAZINE
http://reason.com/0103/co.wo.overlawyered.shtml

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE# 25:

Lafate v. Chase Manhattan Band, 123 F.Supp.2d 773 (D.Del. 2000)

SOURCE: SHOOTING THE MESSENGER
http://www.npelra.org/2003conference/messenger.pdf

CACHE: EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
http://web.archive.org/web/20000815224626/http://www.lawnewsnetwork.com/stories/A10908-1999Dec6.html

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE# 26:

Deborah Faryniarz v. Nike Inc., No. 00-Civ. 2623 [NRB], S.D. N.Y.;
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15825 Shepardize.

SOURCE: BENNETT LAW FIRM
http://www.bennettlawfirm.com/mealey.htm

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

CASE # 27

STATE OF WASHINGTON
KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
SAID ABA SHEIKH,	Plaintiff,
v.
KEVIN S. CHOE and KUM S. CHOE, dba SOUTH SEATTLE MARKET, a sole
proprietorship; SHELL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; HEIGHT POINT
MINI MART & DELI, a domestic nonprofit corporation; STATE OF
WASHINGTON; KING COUNTY; EMMA DANIELS; MICHAEL GALLOW; MYCHAL
ANDERSON; PULEFANO ATIVALU; and MIGUEL T. PIERRE, Defendants.
NO. 02-2-05199-5 SEA

SOURCE: TRIAL BRIEF
http://www1.dshs.wa.gov/word/TrialBrief.doc

SOURCE: SEATTLE TIMES
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2001794141_foster18m.html



I truly enjoyed this challenge. I hope you find that my research
exceeds your expectations. If you have any questions about my research
please post a clarification request prior to rating the answer.
Otherwise I welcome your rating and your final comments and I look
forward to working with you again in the near future. Thank you for
bringing your question to us.

Best regards;
Tutuzdad-ga ? Google Answers Researcher



INFORMATION SOURCES

Defined in each instance above.


SEARCH STRATEGY


SEARCH ENGINE USED:

Google ://www.google.com


SEARCH TERMS USED:

IN each instance I used combinations of the information provided by
you and other sources I was able to find. I often used the plaintiffs?
and defendants? names (i.e., ?Smith v.?, or ?v. Smith?), locations
(i.e., ?v. City of New York?), details and awards as my search terms.

Clarification of Answer by tutuzdad-ga on 04 Feb 2004 07:13 PST
In answer to your last question, Yes - I do think your price was
quiute fair under the circumstances and we always appreciate it when a
customer understands the level of compensation for the amount of work
necessary. That always makes the research more worthy of the time and,
honestly, more enjoyable to do.

As for how long it took; well, I worked on it sporadically throughout
the afternoon. Some cases took more time than others and obviously I
spent more time on the ones I could not find than the ones that I did
find. Some of them were located literally within seconds of searching,
while others took 45 minutes or so. On average I spent about 20
minutes per case question.

I hope this helps you map out your future posts here and I look
forward to working with you on those as well. You can post your future
questions in the forum for anyone to research or you can ask
specifically for a researcher in your subject line when you post your
question. If I am lucky enough to get your future questions I will
provide you with the best research I can.

Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
wordwarp-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $50.00
Awesome work, Tutuzdad!  I added a $50 tip for you!  I'll be back! -- wordwarp

Comments  
Subject: Re: Tort Lawsuits
From: pafalafa-ga on 04 Feb 2004 07:07 PST
 
I sure put my foot in my mouth on this one.  I stand very, very
corrected.  Nice work, tutuzdad!
Subject: Re: Tort Lawsuits
From: tutuzdad-ga on 04 Feb 2004 07:15 PST
 
It happens my friend. Thanks for the glowing review.

tutuzdad-ga

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy