You have no agreement with the landlord that binds him. He left a
message on your machine, changing the verbal agreement and that is
sufficient, unless your verabl agreement included a provision for
changes in another format.
An agreement is an understanding (a meeting of minds) that can be
changed at any time by either party and if notice is properly given of
that change, before that change caused a loss then there is no cause
for action.
If the message was on your machine after you had taken steps to meet
your obligations of the agreement, then your remedial rights change.
However, any action will consider what a "reasonable person" would do
in such a circumstance. In your case, to accept the undertaking of a
verbal agreement for a lease is not reasonable. Next, a lease is a
legal right derived from legislation. Therefore, you had no lease or
rental agreement that is enforcable beause such agreements are
protected (made enforceable) by the statute or legislation.
Your best action would be a small claim for losses, if you can prove
that the other party caused them. In such cases, the judge will
consider if you contributed to your own losses? The answer is
probably yes, becaause you did not seek and execute a written lease.
That you drove to Cincinatti is not an issue, becase you coiuld have
looked i your own area for alternative accommodation. It really sucks,
but you have no case and no recourse.
That there was no period discussed, shows the agreement was not
complete. That there other apartment had a year lonmg lease, does not
mean the landlord commonly gives year long leases for all apartments,
and if he did, he can change his mind anyway. That is the benefit of
the freedom of choice and personal rights, to change ones mind. That
means, in futurte, trust no one and alwasy ensure you have a signed
agreement. If you don't then the superior party will always screw you.
That is your lesson from this event and never forget it! |