|
|
Subject:
hypothetical energy consumption question
Category: Science > Physics Asked by: timespacette-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
23 Dec 2004 00:17 PST
Expires: 22 Jan 2005 00:17 PST Question ID: 446354 |
how many average American homes could be run per year on the amount of energy needed for the inessential bright lights of Las Vegas per year? bonus question for a hefty tip: if all the commercial gyms in Las Vegas (how many are there?) could use the energy generated through the use of all their exercise equipment, how many average American homes could they run per year? (assuming a reasonable percentage of usable energy) (oh drats. I just realized I may have just given Bryan another brilliant and marketable idea . . . !) |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: hypothetical energy consumption question
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Dec 2004 00:54 PST |
Brilliant, O Timely One, Another age-old secret is finally revealed. The late Nikola Tesla always claimed that he had conceived a way of providing the world with FREE energy. Naturally, he was 'silenced' by You-Know-Who before he could launch his venture but, so the story goes, he entrusted his secret to one of his faithful disciples who (allegedly) locked it in a small safe and then conveniently 'lost' the combination. For the sake of your health, I advise you NOT to resuscitate this exciting energy conversion scheme .... for obvious reasons. (You may find yourself beaten up by a frying-pan, non-stick or otherwise.) |
Subject:
Re: hypothetical energy consumption question
From: steph53-ga on 23 Dec 2004 05:18 PST |
OMG!!!!!!!! Too funny..... Don't hit yourself on the head with any frying pans Bryan... |
Subject:
Re: hypothetical energy consumption question
From: silver777-ga on 23 Dec 2004 10:31 PST |
Hi TS, The first law of thermodynamics tells us that energy can not be created. It can only be transferred from one form to another. Your question of this finite source has great merit. I would argue though, that the bright lights of Las Vegas are essential. How else would the children abandoned to locked cars be amused as they wait for the return of beloved elders? How else do you propose the struggling casino operators differentiate themselves? Surely flashier signage is to assist the negative investor with an informed choice of immediate gratification of loss. The actual number of gyms is almost irrelevant to your other question, as you refer to the energy displaced by the equipment in use. Should 10,000 gym goers attend a spread of 47, 32 or 115 gymnasiums, the expended energy via equipment use alone should broadly be the same. Phil ps Please ask Irene what "bahhhh ... bahhhhhhh .. bahhhhhhhhh" means. |
Subject:
Re: hypothetical energy consumption question
From: neilzero-ga on 23 Dec 2004 13:48 PST |
I presume The brighter lights of Las Vegus generally use floresent tubes rather than incandesent, so perhaps the brightest 100 average one million watts of inessentual electricity, and the rest of the city only wastes one million watts. This would run about 1000 average USA homes; somewhat more if you decided none of the casino lights are essential. While a physically fit human can generate about 2000 watts, the average at the gym applied to the exercise equipment is likely about 50 watts times 10,000 persons (peak) exercising = 1/2 million watts = only enough to light one medium bright casino. Neil |
Subject:
Re: hypothetical energy consumption question
From: timespacette-ga on 23 Dec 2004 21:23 PST |
Personally, I am very fond of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, not because it basically states that everything . . . and ah mean everythin' . . . is going to hell in a handbasket, but because it tacitly implies a self-organizing principle moving the other way. Very cool. Very, very cool. But I digress . . . As for Tesla, I just might end up agreeing with Puzzled of Hove about the dangers involved. I heard that Tesla once made a whole ship disappear and reappear, and that when it came back some of the crew members were embedded in the steel hull! Eeeeuuuuwww! I, for one, would not want to see those lovely Abs of Steel and Buns of Steel embedded in Nautilus machines . . . althought this could have a certain appeal to the television viewing public. Perhaps a new reality TV show? Light Up America: the Tesla Challenge. I think, too, that Phil has a good point about those poor kids; I've seen their faces myself, though they did seem to be enjoying their Gameboys. If there was any fear and loathing there, it was definitely being mitigated. Speaking of gates, did you know that Tesla invented the Logic Gate? oops! darn! it's been left ajar (as it happens not infrequently in these forums) . . . and the sheep are getting out! As Pink would say, how are ya gonna keep 'em down on the forum . . . once they've spotted an open Logic Gate? Ahhhh. One. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six. . . . . Zzzzzzz..... |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |