I have to start with a story.
Years ago, I was attending a professional meeting in Paris that was
taking place in the same building that housed the International Atomic
Energy Agency. As I checked in at security, they mistook me for a
dignatary who was late for a presentation he was to give at the IAEA.
I was quickly ushered into the VIP elevator and up to the grand
conference space of the IAEA, where I was hastily mis-introduced and
expected to give a talk on the Russian radionuclide situation.
I never knew who was more chagrined, them or me. But still, the IAEA
holds a special place in my heart.
It also happens to be the agency that collates information from more
than 100 countries around the world in terms of nuclear facilities
that could pose a radiation hazard at some time, and thus need special
oversight. So, I turned to the IAEA website as my first source of
information and -- with a bit of searching -- came up with this:
This is a link to the Annex tables in the IAEA 2003 annual report.
In particular, Table A24 is titled: "Facilities under Agency
safeguards or containing safeguarded material on 31 December 2003".
This table is the motherlode. It lists more than 1,000 facilities
around the world , grouped by country and by the type of facility.
The list begins with nuclear power reactors, and begins with
Atucha Nuclear Power Plant in Lima
Embalse Nuclear Power Plant in Embalse
and so on.
Note that many cities have multiple listings, usually indicating
multiple facilities at a single site. For instance, seven distinct
nuclear power plants are listed for Kashiwazaki-shi, Niigata-ken,
As comprehensive as this report is, there are some glaring omissions.
For the most part, facilities in the US and Russia are not listed in
this report (I believe that's because the nuclear weapons superpowers
are handled in a different framework by the IAEA). So, a bit of
fishing around is needed to fill in the missing information.
Russian facilities can be found at other IAEA sites:
Information on nuclear facilities in Russia can be found in Figure 3,
which shows a map of Russian nuclear power plants, while this link:
Safety Status Safety Status of Russian Nuclear Research Facilities of
Russian Nuclear Research Facilities
provides a list of spent fuel storage facilities and their cities in
which they are located (page 8).
Information on nuclear facilities in the US can be accessed at the
site of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Among the tabs at the top of the page is one called "Facility Info
Finder". Click on this to take you to:
which allows you to access information about nuclear facilities throughout the US.
This link provides a list of all nuclear power plants, as well as a map:
Similarly, here is a map and list of fuel facilities as well as uranium mines:
Lastly, this site:
provides a highly-detailed world map of nuclear power plants.
This is a huge topic, and I've tried to select the most pertinent
sources of information for the query you posted. I trust this
information will fully meet your needs, and then some.
However, before rating this answer, please let me know if there's
anything else you need. Just post a Request for Clarification, and
I'll be happy to assist you further.
All the best with your research....
search strategy: Used bookmarked sites for nuclear power information,
as well as Google searches on [ nuclear facilities russia 2002..2004 ]
and similar searches for other country names.
Clarification of Answer by
09 Jan 2005 13:03 PST
Here's some additional information on nuclear sites (both power
plants, and contaminated sites) that I trust will be useful for you in
Nuclear Radiation Hazards USA [map]
[radiation hazard sites listed by state]
[nuclear power plants -- good international map collection]
[This resource lists sites in the US contaminated by nuclear materials
as well as chemical substances involving the US weapons/energy
programs -- it seems it would be a terrific resource not only for this
current question, but for your other question involving non-nuclear
hazards as well]
A typical record looks like this:
Also Known As: Ashland #1
Also Known As: Ashland #2
Also Known As: Ashland Oil Company
Also Known As: Haist Property
Also Known As: E. Haist and co owners
State: New York Location: Tonawanda
Time Period: AWE 1944-1960; 1974-1982
Facility Type: Atomic Weapons Employer
Facility Description: In August 1944, the Manhattan Engineer District
purchased the Ashland #1 property, formerly known as the Haist
Property, for use as a disposal site for approximately 7,250 metric
tons (8,000 tons) of uranium ore tailings and concentrate refining
residues generated at the nearby Linde site. When the uranium residues
were transported to the Ashland #1 site, they were spread over
two-thirds of the property to estimated depths of 0.3 to 1.5 meters
(one to five feet). In 1960, the Atomic Energy Commission determined
that the levels of residual radioactivity at Ashland #1 site were
below then current criteria and released the land as surplus. The
Ashland Oil Company eventually acquired the property . From 1957 to
1982, the Ashland Oil Company used a portion of the Ashland #2 site as
a landfill for disposal of general plant refuse and industrial and
chemical wastes and materials. Between 1974 and 1982, Ashland Oil
transported from the Ashland #1 site an unknown quantity of soil mixed
with radioactive residues to the Ashland #2 landfill.
Although the Ashland Oil facility was designated for the Formerly
Utilized Site Remediation Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1984, no actual
remediation under this program occurred prior to its transfer to the
Search for keyword "radioactive" turns up 48 results -- other terms
[e.g. "uranium" ] produce different lists. It is also possible to see
the full list of all 366 facilities, which include both nucler and
Again, I hope these help you in your efforts.
As for your other question, I have to be honest -- it just seems an
overwhelming task to me to identify all (or even very many) of the
types of sites you asked about. I imagine there are literally
millions of such facilities around the world. However, some of the
resources I already identified -- especially the DOE link above --
should at least be a way to get started.
By the way, the questions posted here are not "assigned" to a
particular researcher -- all the Google Answers researchers can see
all the questions posted, and any one of the researchers that feels
they can answer the question can then "lock" it, and work on an
It may be the case that the other researchers felt as I do about your
new question -- that it is so broad in scope as to be extremely
difficult to answer.
Best of luck with your work...