I have done a small amount of research regarding citizens' arrests and
have found the following:

"In the most crime ridden spot in the country, our nation's capitol,
District of Columbia Law 23- 582(b) reads as follows:

    (b) A private person may arrest another -

        (1) who he has probable cause to believe is committing in his presence -

            (A) a felony, or

            (B) an offense enumerated in section 23-581 (a)(2); or 

        (2) in aid of a law enforcement officer or special policeman,
or other person authorized by law to make an arrest.

    (c) Any person making an arrest pursuant to this section shall
deliver the person arrested to a law enforcement officer without
unreasonable delay. (July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 630, Pub. L. 91-358,
Title II, § 210(a); 1973 Ed., § 23-582; Apr. 30, 1988, D.C. Law 7-104,
§ 7(e), 35 DCR 147.)"

I'm both wondering if the law for Utah is stricter or more lenient on
Citizens' Arrests.  That is to say, would the offending law have to be
a felony?  Furthurmore, I would like to know exactly what "an offense
enumerated in section 23-581 (a)(2)" would consist of.

Secondly, I would like information regarding the illegality of "death
threats", "Threats of bodily harm", etc.  Especially if conveyed in
writing and not verbally.  Again, this information is to be based
around Utah law.

If this information could be presented in a fashionable manner, a tip
will most certainly be rewarded.

Dear devonhiggins-ga;

Thank you for allowing me an opportunity to answer your interesting
question. Let me answer the question about 23-581 first:

District of Columbia Code 23-581 is officially entitled:

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE 2001 EDITION 
DIVISION IV. CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE AND PRISONERS. 
TITLE 23. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 
CHAPTER 5. WARRANTS AND ARRESTS. 
SUBCHAPTER V. ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT. 
§ 23-581. Arrests without warrant by law enforcement officers

As you can see, the statute governs the warrantless arrests of
individuals by LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, whereas § 23-582 (the statute
you cited) covers the arrest of individuals without warrant BY OTHER
PERSONS (a ?citizen?s arrest?). The conditions under which a law
enforcement officer may arrest a citizen without a warrant are
numerous and they are listed within the extensive text of this
statute.

§ 23-581. Arrests without warrant by law enforcement officers.
http://dccode.westgroup.com/search/document.wl?RecreatePath=/search/default.wl&n=2&RLT=CLID%5FQRYRLT342742&DB=DC%2DST%2DWEB&Method=WIN&Query=code+23%2D581%0D%0A&MaxDocs=20&Action=SEARCH&CFID=0&RS=DCC1.0&VR=1.0&RLTDB=CLID%5FDB202742

???..

The Statute regulating a citizen?s arrest authority in the State of
Utah is very broad and very brief:

?77-7-3.   By private persons.

A private person may arrest another:
(1)	For a public offense committed or attempted in his presence; or
(2)	When a felony has been committed and he has reasonable cause to
believe the person arrested has committed it.

UTAH CODE
http://www.livepublish.le.state.ut.us/lpBin22/lpext.dll/InfobaseUtahCode/title19279.htm/chapter19349.htm/section19352.htm?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm&q=77-7-3&x=Advanced&2.0

And?

?76-2-403.   Force in arrest.
Any person is justified in using any force, except deadly force, which
he reasonably believes to be necessary to effect an arrest or to
defend himself or another from bodily harm while making an arrest.?

UTAH CODE
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_02023.htm


Now, as you know, we cannot provide legal advice or assistance in this
forum, so in MY OPINION of this statute, from the way it is worded,
the offense need not be a felony as long as it is a public offense
(literally, an offense committed in public).

Is this more or less strict than the laws in DC? I?d have to say it
has to be considered much less strict as it gives the citizens of Utah
much more authority in affecting a warrantless arrest.

???.


The issue about threatening is quite complex in Utah and the law
specifically mentions a variety of crimes that fall in this category.
Generally speaking however, with regard to your hypothetical scenario
of the threatening letter, the law states that ?a person commits a
terroristic threat if he threatens to commit any offense involving
bodily injury, death, or substantial property damage? and his threat
serves to ?place a person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury,
substantial bodily injury, or death?. The law does not specify any
means of threat (i.e. letter, telephone, etc) and goes on to say that
it is not a defense under this section that the threatening party did
not actually attempt to, or was incapable of, carrying out the threat,
and that such a threat does not have to be direct in order to be
considered a crime; the communicated threat may be express or implied.

In this circumstance, a terroristic threat is considered a Class B Misdemeanor.

76-5-107.	Terroristic threat
http://www.livepublish.le.state.ut.us/lpBin22/lpext.dll/InfobaseUtahCode/title18582.htm/chapter18687.htm/section18702.htm?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm&q=%5Bs%5D%5Brank,100%3A%5Bdomain%3A%5Band%3A%5Bstem%3A%5Band%3Aterroristic%5D%5D%5D%5D%5Bsum%3A%5Bstem%3Aterroristic%20%5D%5D%5D&x=Advanced&2.0

Hopefully I?ve answered your questions sufficiently.

I hope you find that my research exceeds your expectations. If you
have any questions about my research please post a clarification
request prior to rating the answer. Otherwise, I welcome your rating
and your final comments and I look forward to working with you again
in the near future. Thank you for bringing your question to us.

Best regards;
Tutuzdad ? Google Answers Researcher


OTHER INFORMATION SOURCES

§ 23-582. Arrests without warrant by other persons.
http://dccode.westgroup.com/search/document.wl?RecreatePath=/search/default.wl&n=7&RLT=CLID%5FQRYRLT342742&DB=DC%2DST%2DWEB&Method=WIN&Query=code+23%2D581%0D%0A&MaxDocs=20&Action=SEARCH&CFID=0&RS=DCC1.0&VR=1.0&RLTDB=CLID%5FDB202742

TITLE 77 - UTAH CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
http://www.code-co.com/utah/code/03/77-07.htm#T77-7-3


SEARCH STRATEGY


SEARCH ENGINES USED:

Google ://www.google.com

---

Request for Answer Clarification by devonhiggins-ga on 04 Feb 2005 21:20 PST

Your answer was astounding and insightful!  However, it raises some
additional conditions, (again, hypothetical questions but are of some
great importance to me.)

Will the Patriot Act effect any of these circumstances, seeing as how
it is a terroristic threat?

Secondly, if the criminal was a minor (perhaps almost 18), would
he\she be tried as an adult or would it effect any judicial decisions?

Could you define "deadly force?"  I have thought that it was simply
any force that would result in a fatal injury, but I'd like a proper
definition.

Finally, I'm assuming that if a person attempting citizen's arrest
would have the right to defend him\herself from deadly force of the
accused with, perhaps, similar deadly force.

Thank you so much for your time, I will reimburse you more than I
origionally intented if you could clarify these additional details.

---

Clarification of Answer by tutuzdad-ga on 05 Feb 2005 08:16 PST

"Will the Patriot Act effect any of these circumstances, seeing as how
it is a terroristic threat?"

Probably not - at least not right now. If you read the Utah statute
you will see that Utah had the foresight to word in "weapons of mass
destruction" into their statute. The provision for aggravating
circumstances in that state's law already exists.

"Secondly, if the criminal was a minor (perhaps almost 18), would
he\she be tried as an adult or would it effect any judicial
decisions?"

Juveniles are tried in juvenile courts which typipcally have
jurisdiction over them until the reach the legal age of adulthood in
that state. Like any other state, if a crime is serious enough, the
offender is near the age of adulthood, and the circumstances warrant
it, the juvenile court will declare the child an adult for prosecution
purposes (essentially legally emmancipating him) and remand the case
to adult courts where he could, theoretically, face maximum adult
punishments. This process is not unique to Utah.

The legal age of criminal accountability in the state of Utah is 14.

"A person is not criminally responsible for conduct performed before
he reaches the age of fourteen years. This section shall in no way
limit the jurisdiction of or proceedings before the juvenile courts of
this state."

76-2-301.   Person under fourteen years old not criminally responsible.
http://www.livepublish.le.state.ut.us/lpBin22/lpext.dll/InfobaseUtahCode/title18582.htm/chapter18612.htm/section18623.htm?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm&q=%5Bs%5D%5Brank,100%3A%5Bdomain%3A%5Band%3A%5Bstem%3A%5Borderedprox,0%3A76-2-301%5D%5D%5D%5D%5Bsum%3A%5Bstem%3A%5Borderedprox,0%3A76-2-301%5D%5D%5D%5D&x=Advanced&2.0

Statutes pertaining to the implementation of the "use of force" in
defense of another, or in defense of your home and property can be
found here:

76-2-402.   Force in defense of person -- Forcible felony defined.
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_02022.htm

76-2-405.   Force in defense of habitation.
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_02025.htm

76-2-406.   Force in defense of property.
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_02026.htm

76-2-407.   Deadly force in defense of persons on real property.
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_02027.htm

Use of force is broadly defined by the Supreme Court in TENNESSEE v.
GARNER, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). This has become the modern model example
for such a case.

""The use of deadly force is not justifiable . . . unless (i) the
arrest is for a felony; and (ii) the person effecting the arrest is
authorized to act as a peace officer or is assisting a person whom he
believes to be authorized to act as a peace officer; and (iii) the
actor believes that the force employed creates no substantial risk of
injury to innocent persons; and (iv) the actor believes [471 U.S. 1,
7]   that (1) the crime for which the arrest is made involved conduct
including the use or threatened use of deadly force; or (2) there is a
substantial risk that the person to be arrested will cause death or
serious bodily harm if his apprehension is delayed." American Law
Institute, Model Penal Coded 3.07(2)(b) (Proposed Official Draft
1962)."

TENNESSEE v. GARNER, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) 
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=471&invol=1

In Utah deadly force is defined as "force intended or likely to cause
death or serious bodily injury". It is defined in one 76-2-402:

76-2-402. Force in defense of person -- Forcible felony defined.  
http://www.livepublish.le.state.ut.us/lpBin22/lpext.dll/InfobaseUtahCode/title18582.htm/chapter18612.htm/section18633.htm?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm&q=%5Bs%5D%5Brank,100%3A%5Bdomain%3A%5Band%3A%5Bstem%3A%5Borderedprox,0%3A76-2-402%5D%5D%5D%5D%5Bsum%3A%5Bstem%3A%5Borderedprox,0%3A76-2-402%5D%5D%5D%5D&x=Advanced&2.0

I hope this adds significantly to what I have offered.

Regards;
tutuzdad-ga

Thank you!  I would expect nothing less from this service.

Well what I do know is that when you place somone under citizen's
arrest you have to inform them of that, and you have to read them
there miranda rights. If you place someone under citizens arrest and
they have commited no crime in the eyes of the law then you have just
placed someone under false arrest which you can be held accountable
for.

No miranda rights are needed.  Since the arresting citizen isn't
taking the person to a police office, but to an actual officer of the
law, the officer will read the rights.