|
|
Subject:
Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: droprock-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
19 Apr 2005 05:51 PDT
Expires: 19 May 2005 05:51 PDT Question ID: 511287 |
I need proof that the word buttload was used as a term of measurement. I know a A butt = 126 US Fluid gallons and a load = 201.97 US Fluid Gallons. But I heard somewhere that a "buttload" was a term used by "sea men" back in the day. I just need some proof that this term was or is used as an actual term of measurement. Please provide a legit reference and feel free to ask any question you may have. |
|
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
Answered By: leapinglizard-ga on 20 Apr 2005 17:44 PDT Rated: |
Dear droprock, Thank you for accepting my answer. As we now know, the Oxford English Dictionary has a citation for "butt-load" as a unit of measure equal to "about six seams", which amounts to roughly 450 gallons. Regards, leapinglizard |
droprock-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: nelson-ga on 19 Apr 2005 06:06 PDT |
Nothing at Merriam-Webster's Collegiate. Perhaps a researcher with access to the unabridged OED can help. |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: droprock-ga on 19 Apr 2005 06:10 PDT |
any idea where I can find one of them? |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: leapinglizard-ga on 19 Apr 2005 06:30 PDT |
There is no entry in the Oxford English Dictionary for "buttload". However, there is such a thing as a "butt-load". 1796 MARSHALL W. England I. Gloss. (E.D.S.) Butt, a close-bodied cart; as dung-butt..gurry-butt..ox-butt, etc. Butt-load, about six seams. There you have it. A butt-load is about six seams. Does that answer your question? leapinglizard |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: droprock-ga on 19 Apr 2005 06:41 PDT |
I need the measurment term - unless a seam is a unit of measurement..What book did you find this in? I was watching a show on Public television about ship building and the man said buttload was a little bit larger that a 50 gallon barrel.. |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: om3-ga on 19 Apr 2005 07:00 PDT |
2005-04-19 14:00 I first heard this term popularized about 6 years ago on WROX 96.1 FM near the Norfolk Naval Base where they often get whole "buttloads" of seamen. After a while I reasoned that they were referring to marine "boatloads" as in railway "carloads". This is the same station that long harped on the arrest of a black woman for having oral sex with a male in a car front seat with a 3-year-old girl in the back seat watching. |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: leapinglizard-ga on 19 Apr 2005 07:01 PDT |
Indeed, a seam is a measure. seam: a traditional unit of volume. A seam of grain was 8 bushels: this would be equivalent to 290.95 liters based on the British Imperial bushel, or 281.91 liters based on the older U.S bushel. UNC: Russ Rowlett: How Many? http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictS.html If we go by the OED's definition, a butt-load is about 450 gallons. The definition of butt-load above is from the OED. Do you now consider your question answered? leapinglizard |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: myoarin-ga on 19 Apr 2005 07:12 PDT |
HI, I imagine your butt of 126 gallons =two hogshead, according to Webster's that gives them a size of 63 to 120 gallons. That variance suggests that the volumes for the containers were not to precise. I would suspect that the man in the film was probably in error - or had and entirely different source for his statement. Since barrels were used not just to transport liquids (ceramics packed in straw, or anything else), I can imagine that a buttload could have been an expression for the storage capacity of a sailing ship. Your larger butt (sorry) would seem a more logical container for non-liquids than his 50+ gallon one, but that is not any more specific. |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: droprock-ga on 19 Apr 2005 07:22 PDT |
leapinglizard - I will check this reference on my lunch break - if indeed it is in there - You (leapinglizard) have answered my question. does that work for you? |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: leapinglizard-ga on 19 Apr 2005 12:25 PDT |
Oh, sure. But I'll wait to post my answer until you've confirmed the dictionary entry. Any good library should have the complete Oxford English Dictionary -- beware of the abridged or concise version! leapinglizard |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: droprock-ga on 19 Apr 2005 15:01 PDT |
local library only had the short version - headed to the city to look for the larger one..... Ill keep you posted. |
Subject:
Re: Buttload - is or was it ever used as an actual form of measurement?
From: droprock-ga on 20 Apr 2005 15:41 PDT |
leapinglizard - please post the answer - you were correct - Thank you millions |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |