|
|
Subject:
instant brown rice or non-instant white rice
Category: Health Asked by: kpfleger-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
09 May 2005 16:30 PDT
Expires: 08 Jun 2005 16:30 PDT Question ID: 519701 |
A couple of us would like to better understand the health implications of brown vs. white and instant vs. non-instant rice. This leads to several related questions around two central issues: Which is healthier, instant brown rice or non-instant white rice? Which has a lower glycemic index? What are the other differences in health of the two? Is instant rice less healthy in any way than non-instant rice? We understand that brown rice is in some way less processed than white rice. There is something about the milling and/or some other type of processing that I forget the word for right now that is different and leaves more of the whole kernel in tact in brown rice. Much nutrition literature points to advantages of brown rice over white rice for this reason. Since white rice "has more done to it" in some sense (more is removed to make it), why is it that it is white rice not brown rice that is a staple of many cultures diets including old cultures and developing economies where (for both) extra effort seems less likely. We would expect those cultures to eat the more "raw" form by default. Is removing less stuff to create brown rice somehow actually harder than making white rice? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: instant brown rice or non-instant white rice
From: biophysicist-ga on 10 May 2005 20:27 PDT |
You may be interested to know that the glycemic index is not the same for all types of white rice, even. Basmati rice is better than jasmine rice and sticky rice. If I can find my glycemic index book, I'll try to check on instant brown rice for you. This is a free comment. |
Subject:
Re: instant brown rice or non-instant white rice
From: myoarin-ga on 11 May 2005 09:28 PDT |
Check out this thread for the difference between white and brown rice and how they are processed: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=519548 The relative nutritional value of white vs. brown rice is not influenced by which is "instant". That just indicates that the rice (whichever one) has been parboiled, reducing the cooking time for you. The higher nutritional value mentioned in this website http://magazines.ivillage.com/goodhousekeeping/recipes/editor/qas/0,,284589_291569,00.html results from the fact that brown rice still has the "bran" that includes these nutrients, whereby I (just my opinion) would think that some of these have been lost in the parboiling, but when you boil rice at home, you pour off the water, so any nutrients lost that way would also be lost when you strained off the water after having boiled non-instant brown rice for twenty minutes. |
Subject:
Re: instant brown rice or non-instant white rice
From: rinu-ga on 14 May 2005 04:34 PDT |
In parboiled rice, the paddy is boiled with its husk on. This causes the nutrients to be absorbed into the rice grain itself. When the rice is boiled later, the nutrients cannot be removed. |
Subject:
Re: instant brown rice or non-instant white rice
From: hungrydude-ga on 31 May 2005 15:57 PDT |
This is NOT a suburban myth: People have died from SDS, coming from China (and not knowing the difference), who thought that they could eat white rice as a staple instead of the rice they're used to eating. Do NOT eat white rice. You'll get more nutrition from paper. Answer: Instant brown rice from Wild Oats, Trader Joes or a store that doesn't sell anything with hydrogenated oil in any of thier products. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |