Google Answers Logo
View Question
Q: Online Public Records Niche Analysis ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Subject: Online Public Records Niche Analysis
Category: Business and Money > eCommerce
Asked by: apmfree-ga
List Price: $200.00
Posted: 03 Sep 2006 19:06 PDT
Expires: 03 Oct 2006 19:06 PDT
Question ID: 761973
What are the biggest frustrations people face when searching for
public records online-whether they're looking to do a background
check, looking for someone's court records, or simply doing a people

In other words, what are the pitfalls people face when searching for
public records information online (ie is the information not
avaliable, is it not up-to-date, hard to find, public record sites are
not user friendly, etc..) Give a percentage breakdown if possible.

Also, what percent of these people refer to paid services (such as over information that is avaliable free online? And why?

What frustrations did they face with paid public records services?

Please cite all results.

Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 04 Sep 2006 13:06 PDT

As a research professional who has conducted thousands of searches o
public records, I can certainly offer you my own insights as to the
biggest frustrations involved.  Off the top of my head, they fall into
several broad categories:  multiplicity of sources; lack of
transparency; inconsistent rules and means of access; arcane protocol
and language (ie very user unfriendly); and weak search offerings.

There are doubtless others that would pop up with a bit more reflection.

HOWEVER, I am not aware of any statistical break-outs for  user
experiences with public record searching.  Nor do I know of any way to
find quantitative information on the number or percent of users that
turn to sources like Intellius.

In other words, I can address the first two paragraphs of your
question (all but the last sentence, 2nd paragraph), based on my
experience as a research professional.

However, I'm at a loss as to the next two paragraphs regarding
services like Intellius.  As far as I know, information along those
lines simply isn't available.

Let me know your thoughts on all this.



Clarification of Question by apmfree-ga on 04 Sep 2006 17:16 PDT
Hi pafalafa-ga,

Thanks you for your efforts!

First off you mentioned the following as frustrations:
"multiplicity of sources; lack of
transparency; inconsistent rules and means of access; arcane protocol
and language (ie very user unfriendly); and weak search offerings."

May you please elaborate in detail on each of the above points.  Also
if you could find some studies or data backing up your personal
experience, that would be great :) (cite all references).

Also, although there's no percentage statistics avaliable, could you
please research what REAL benefits (if any) paid search directories
offer over free information? That would answer my questions as to why
people choose to pay (sometimes hefty amounts) for a paid public
records search site like or

Ulitmately what I'm trying to find out is what would I need to include
in a paid  search service that provides the most value for the
searcher by eliminating most of the frustrations they face when
searching for public records? Your personal input on this matter would
be appreciated.


Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 04 Sep 2006 17:47 PDT

Thanks for getting back to me.  I'll be happy to work on your question
and, unless you're in a terrific rush, I'd like to take a few days to
put together a thorough answer...let me know if the timing would be a
problem for you.

Also, one point of clarification.  You mentioned "paid search
directories" at one point.  I think of this as something different
that a paid search service.  The latter provides actual information
from public records (i.e. give us a person's name, and we'll tell you
their address, phone number, workplace, criminal record, etc).

A public records search directory, on the other hand, is an organized
pointer-system to records that are publicly available.  An example of
this is SearchSystems:

which used to be a wonderful resource that was totally free to users,
but now has become difficult and awkward to use for non-paying
cusomters, but much more convenient to those willing to subscribe to
their service.  In either case, it points users to thousands of public
record sites, but does not, itself, perform records searches.

SearchSystems is a very different creature than Intellius...the first
I call a Public Records Directory Service, while the latter is a true
Public Records Search service.

I assume it's the Intellius-type services that you're asking about,
but let me know if I've misunderstood your interests.

Other than that....stay tuned!


Clarification of Question by apmfree-ga on 04 Sep 2006 21:09 PDT
Hi pafalafa-ga,

Thanks for the clarification, I'm actually a member of, and am really impressed with their service!  Now
that I think about, type of paid public records
search service is exactly what I'm thinking of.  So go ahead and
answer the questions in my previous post with this site as the
standard of comparison.

Also, there's no rush, take your time to write a thorough answer. I'm
making major business decision based on your answer, if you know what
I'm saying :)
Subject: Re: Online Public Records Niche Analysis
Answered By: pafalafa-ga on 07 Sep 2006 20:06 PDT
Rated:5 out of 5 stars

Thanks for your patience...and for providing the additional comments
and clarifications...they were a great help in focusing my thoughts
and research.

In my experience, the US is the most open society in the world in
terms of collecting and making available vast amounts of information
of all sorts...including information on individuals available through
a dizzying variety of "public records".  Having the information
available is one thing.  Accessing it, though, is quite another. 
Hence, the frustrations you asked about.

I'll start off by addressing the categories of frustrations that I
mentioned earlier:


Publicly available information on individuals and businesses is
largely collected by government agencies (the one major exception is
telephone directory listings which are privately collected, but access
to landline listings is mandated by government regulations).

The number of government agencies that collect and make available
public information is phenomenal.  Data is collected by:

--Federal agencies (IRS, EPA, FBI, civil courts, criminal courts,
appellate courts, bankruptcy courts, housing agencies, banking
regulators, securities regulators, etc, etc)

--State agencies (50+ state motor vehicle departments, state courts,
prison records, medical boards, licensing agencies, permitting
authorities, etc, etc)

--County and city agencies (similar to the above, along with multiple
land use records, UCC filings for certain commercial transactions,
liens, etc).

And there are a few others as well.  

As your favorite boasts, they offer "Now over 37,294
Searchable Public Record Databases".

That's a lot of databases!  It makes looking for information on a
particular person or business or other entity a real
needle-in-a-haystack problem.

Even a fairly basic question, such as knowing someone is in jail, and
wanting to find out where they are imprisoned, becomes a cumbersome
and time-consuming search of public records.  The federal Bureau of
Prisons site will tell you if the prisoner is in the federal system:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator

but then continuing on to the state level involves exploring 50
different state systems to find out if they have an online inmate
Inmate Locator

and even if you zero-in on a particular state, there are still
separately-maintained local systems to complicate matters.  For
instance, in addition to New York State inmate lookups there are also
these sites to be aware of:

NEW YORK Inmate Locator

Fulton City Police Department Arrest Log

Onedia County Sheriff's Office Inmate List

Onondaga County Inmate Lookup

And there are probably others.  I'm sure you get the picture by's a massive job to keep track of public record availability,
and locate the right sight for one's needs.


All the frustrations in this section header come under the more
familiar term, "Lack of User Friendliness".  A great many public
record website interfaces are terribly difficult to use, even once you
find them.  The difficulties stem from either poor site design, a
stubborn refusal to present an interface in plain English (i.e., use
of arcane jargon, specialty abbreviations, etc), limited search
options or -- frequently -- a combination of all of the above.

For instance, here's the public records page for the Boone County, IL
tax assessor's office:

and their helpful instructions for searching:

"Enter a Parcel without dashes"

Unlike many other tax assessment sites, there is no searching by name,
no searching by address, no way to generate any information other than
to know what a parcel number is for a particular property...they don't
even provide a link to a parcel lookup function!.

Public record sites with complex databases can be even worse.  Here's
a powerful entry point for searching multiple databases maintained by
the US Environmental Protection Agency:

Selecting "Queries" pulls up a menu with entries like:  Multisystem,
AFS, BR, CERCLIS, EMCI...and similar alphabet soup options.

What are these things?  Who knows?  The site offers little guidance in this regard.

There are thousands of examples of sites that ostensibly make public
information freely available, but that are so unfriendly and unusable,
that the information is actually very difficult to access.  The
examples above should give you a good feel for the problems and
frustrations here.



At the federal, state, county, city, borough, parish, tribal and
regional levels -- and probably at some other jurisdictional levels
I've overlooked -- there are similar collections of publicly available
records:  court filings; property assessments; voter registers; liens;
listings of businesses, securities brokers, license holders, doctors,
dentists; criminal records; inmates; birth and death records;
marriages; property sales; sex offenders; permits issued; driving
records; etc, etc.

However, there is very little consistency in how these records are
managed or made available from one jurisdiction to the next.  In
county A the files are online and easily available via a plain
English.  In county B, one must register and pay a steep fee to access
an online system of records.  Over in County C, the records are
ostensibly available online, but through a system so dense and
impenetrable, that calling them "publicly available records" is
something of a misnomer.  And in County D, forget about online records
entirely...if you want to find out what's available, you'll have to
make a trip downtown.

The service performed by commercial operations like Lexis-Nexis, or
Intellius, is that they comb through these myriad sources, and pull
the information into a relatively standardized national database, so
that a single search can uncover oodles of information from multiple

And even a service like -- though it is only a
pointer service, rather than an actual provider of the content of
public records -- performs an enormously valuable function by merely
letting people know what's available online, and wher to go to start
the access process.


You also asked about research and formal studies of public record
access.  There doesn't appear to be a great deal of formal work on
this topic -- most research focuses on the access vs privacy debate. 
However, there is certainly some material that is relevant to your
overall topic:
Learning to Govern Online 
Federal Agency Internet Use 
The American Review of Public Administration
Vol. 32, No. 3, 326-349 (2002),5,8;journal,11,12;linkingpublicationresults,1:110845,1
E-government and the judicial system: online access to case information
Electronic Government, an International Journal  
Issue:   Volume 1, Number 2 / 2004  
Pages:   166 - 178  
...The technological revolution has been slow in coming to the
judicial system, yet there are few places in which technology can have
more of an immediate and beneficial impact. This paper examines the
current state of online access to case information in the US judicial
Web cutoff causes Butler backlash
Order from judges burdens Butler office
July 8, 2003
...When a pair of Butler County judges shut off Internet access to
their courts' records, they opened the floodgates, says Cindy
Carpenter, the county's clerk of courts.
May 2000
...The Fairfax County General District Court has a public access
problem that might be partially remedied by making information from
the court's case management system available for remote public access
over the Internet. Prior to implementing such a system, however, there
are a number of considerations that must be carefully examined. This
paper looks at some of the legal and ethical issues of disseminating
court data electronically, discusses the need to balance the public's
right to know versus the individual's right to privacy, and offers
recommendations for the court.
Screen Level Bureaucracy:
Databases As Public Records
July 15, 2003
...'E-government' is hot. Providing better service by automating
'business processes' is an exciting prospect for improving government.
Yet, there has not been the same level of effort at making it easier
for the public to obtain information about what its government is
doing. This paper focuses on the constraints and opportunities in
making database information available to the public.
A Comparative E-Government Analysis of New Jersey's
10 Largest Municipalities
June 2003
...this research assesses the services provided by New Jersey's
largest municipalities online, and suggests a blueprint for
...Part I of this Note explores the history of access to court
proceedings and records found in United States Supreme Court and New
York State jurisprudence. Part II examines recent federal legislation
adopted by New York that limits access to portions of documents posted
on the Internet that have been freely available for public viewing in

There are also some useful write-ups that you should be aware of:
Know Where to Get the Records
Negotiating for Public Records

and this search engine supposedly zeroes in on public record
information, though (in my limited use of it) I haven't yet been very
impressed with the results:
Public Records Search Engine's a concept worth noting.

I trust the information presented here fully meets your needs. 

However, please do not rate this answer if there are still areas you
would like to have addressed.  Just post a REquest for Clarification
to let me know how I can assist you, and I am at your service.

All the best in your efforts.

apmfree-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $10.00
Great job :) Answer is thorough, complete, and very eye-opening.
Appropriate reference material and citations were provided, as well as
a clear explanation with detailed examples.

There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  

Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy